ant _any_ exceptions? :)
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan fbset
I would have thought there was a little more call for this these days...
is there an alternative tool?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.
I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since
it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too. How?
A local build no longer seems to work for anything but the primary arch,
because it still configures for x86_64:
$ i386 fedpkg local --arch=i686
...
+ ./conf
How long should it take for these to get pushed?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openconnect-2.25-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openconnect-2.25-1.fc13
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
roject.org/updates/openconnect-2.25-1.fc13
>
> Bodhi bug? Where's the bodhi comment saying that you've submitted them for
> either "testing" or "stable"? (compare with other update requests listed
> as "pending")
Hm, odd. I used the link I wa
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:24:42 +0100
> David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > How long should it take for these to get pushed?
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openconnect-2.25-1.fc12
> > https:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 14:20 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:03:57 +0100
> David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On a separate topic, any idea why exim-4.72.fc14 isn't showing up in
> > the repository? It was built on
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 14:31 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, I would say, bump and rebuild now and submit an update.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exim-4.72-2.fc14
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.
something similar to the following to the "If You
> Are Replying to a Message" part in the wiki:
>
> The fact that you're sending the email from a smartphone or similar
> device doesn't invalidate those guidelines. Please consider sending
>
shell script wrapper.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ail to a non-root user or smarthosting, possibly with
> authentication setup) requires manual configuration in any case.
... which could perhaps be done in firstboot. It could ask for the email
address to use for outbound mail from 'root', and the SMTP server
details for a s
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:31 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > I hope cross Fortran and especially cross Java (or cross Ada/ObjC/ObjC++)
> > aren't needed, especially libjava builds for eons and has myriads of target
> > dependencies.
>
> For my purposes, C is sufficient.
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute
> unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though.
That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices,
but the firmware to go with th
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/14/2010 01:31 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
> >> dis
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:20 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > The Broadcom position seems to be entirely crack-inspired, if it's based
> > on the notion that a binary driver cannot be modified to break th
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:38 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> But where do you draw the line?
> A "crack-inspired" judge might argue that the fact that regulation is
> done in software is a problem regardless of the drivers license /
> nature.
There's actually some merit in that position. But still there's
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:39 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> That said, it is still extremely late for F-14 consideration.
> Those interested in seeing this driver in some later F-14 kernel
> update or in F-15 or beyond are strongly encouraged to take-up
> this driver's cause in getting it migrated
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:53 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:34 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jon Masters
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> > Well, the US law of the land says that you can't listen in on
>
-- I often find
it's using an Internet repository without even offering me the choice of
using my local NFS mirror.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
devel mailing list
dev
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Just a quick heads-up that I plan to look unto packaging the
> gnome shell frippery extensions this weekend, if you've the
> same plans or are already working on this, please let me know.
> So we can avoid doing double work.
Did you do thi
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:15 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >> Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
> >
> > [citation needed]
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2011-June/msg00164.html
Seriously, who cares? Upstream are clearly on crack these days anyway.
The best way
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 02:23 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> David: on the subject of your followup...my advice, by the way, is that
> life is too short to continue to try to explain why GNOME Shell is
> unusable for folks like you and I. I'd just switch to XFCE and be done
> with it. My machines are a
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 17:49 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> NM already keeps DHCP information around based on the network you're
> connecting to, so we don't need to ARP a bunch of servers just to
> determine whether the DHCP server we wanted is still there.
That's fine on wireless, but not so usef
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can do the ARP magic, too.
I don't think so. ConnMan doesn't remember the last DHCP setup at all,
and doesn't even set the DHCP_REQUESTED_IP option — so it gets
gratuitously changed IP addresses eac
es it?
[dwmw2@macbook ~]$ time ping casper.ipv6.infradead.org
ping: unknown host casper.ipv6.infradead.org
real0m0.080s
user0m0.001s
sys 0m0.004s
The Solaris 'ping' works the way that Itamar suggests, FWIW. I think
it's a sane plan. Everything should just obey RFC34
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Due to these installer problems we're probably not going to be able to
> > have an official PowerPC release for Fedora 15, but the goal is to
> > definitely get it done for Fedora 16.
>
> Am I interpreting this right that this effctivel
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Did you try it? And did it work? Normally yum will refuse to update
> when you try skipping more than a single version.
Define 'refuse'. It doesn't even *know*, generally.
I *often* update by two releases at a time. Sometimes more.
--
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
> Additional items to cover are:
>
> 1) Are ppc32 machines supported? Specifically I'm thinking of Apple
> G4 machines, but we used to build a bunch of Freescale device drivers
> and such as well for machines in the 6xx class.
We should
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:47 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Creating 64bit images with an additional 32bit glibc just for yaboot is
> suboptimal, but seems to work so far.
Why does yaboot use glibc? Isn't it built with -nostdlib? The issue was
libextfs.a, wasn't it? And didn't we solve that somehow?
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 09:04 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 04:00 -0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:04 +, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like that firmware is in Linus' tree, but somehow it is not in
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:53 +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>
> We have tested them on a Power7 box as well as on an older Apple G5, but
> your mileage may vary. Especially on Power5 and Power6 the problem still
> exists that the unified initramfs of Anaconda is too large to fit into
> the initial R
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:48 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Anything with an fe80:: prefix is a link local address, which
> is only unique within the scope of a single LAN segment. Thus
> if you want to send traffic to such addresses, you need to specify
> the NIC to send the traffic out from.
new HD using gdisk and the kernel seems to recognise it
> without any problems.
Are there any good reasons to do this _other_ than so we can cope with
larger disks?
How about doing it only for disks which are too large to cope with the
DOS-style partition tables?
--
em-wide NSS database is an
extremely useful plan, but the implementation is still fairly broken.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
odeswitch could test this
> version as well and give it a karma :)
Might work better if you set $bindir to /usr/bin in the
/lib/udev/usb_modeswitch script. Or did you mean to move the
usb_modeswitch binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin in the packaging?
(I tested the F-12 version)
-
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:03 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> I would rather patch the tcl script to use the binary in /usr/bin :)
> Unless people thing otherwise.
Why deviate from what upstream does, which is to use /usr/sbin?
--
David WoodhouseOpen
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:08 +0400, Lucas wrote:
>
> I am talking about ipsec over TCP.
>
> Everything can do ipsec over UDP, but none over TCP. But on my job for
> the security reason UDP is blocked, cisco vpn can do ipsec over tcp.
That's entirely stupid. The Cisco "IPsec over TCP" is basically
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:10 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Why not use a tun/tap interface set up with a private ip address which the
> vpn application causes to be masqueraded by the host? That should work and
> be portable across all kernel versions.
Yeah, that's one of of the options. But
bits in the upper layers which are
required to ensure we only ever write a full stripe.
That should allegedly be Real Soon Now. Although he's been saying that
for quite a long time... :)
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
on't really use any
more and that is going to be going away real soon now. That's not very
useful.
Michael? Did you submit the new firmware for linux-firmware.git and I
just missed it? If so, I apologise; please could you resend?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Sou
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:07 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> and that explains how we missed the bnx2 firmware changes. Does this
> mean you will not be merging from Linus going forward?
We'll be *removing* the legacy firmware/ directory from Linus' tree.
I didn't intend to merge from there at a
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:13 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
>
> I already posted all the missing firmware files for the linux-firmware
> git tree last week.
Did you repost the patches with appropriate entries in the WHENCE file,
as requested?
--
dwmw2
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 12:55 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 12:53 -0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:13 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> > >
> > > I already posted all the missing firmware files for the linux-firmware
> > &
d nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
> Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
Downgrade this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504949
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com
packages too.
Fedora seems to have regressed a lot in that respect, although it did
improve after we started approving ProvenPackagers.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
devel m
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
>
> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
> FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
>
> Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
>
> It's simply disgusting !!
You haven't provi
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 16:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > ... many upstreams ignore robots. Other distros have gone through this
> > learning curve many years ago (E.g. Debian, ca. a decade ago).
>
> Then they'll also ignore a packager "playing robot". That's exactly why t
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:54 +0200, Karel Klic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1]
> that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit gpg-encrypted
> files in Fedora 13.
>
> The reason is that GnuPG 1.4 was deprecated after Fedora 12
I'd like to add a new Fedora project for translation.
The instructions in the guide at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3F_.28.23add-transifex.29
have a link to a page which doesn't exist.
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email addre
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 15:50 -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
> > associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
> >
> > "You are not allowed to pos
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 18:08 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
> >
> &
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 17:32 -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
> > be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
> > assistance (or to point out broken links on t
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 15:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be
> 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64
> this morning.
>
> Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two
> th
I have created a COPR at
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dwmw2/pidgin3-sipe/
This contains the work that has been done by Tieto to add media
encryption, file transfer and screen sharing to pidgin-sipe, from:
https://github.com/tieto/pidgin and
https://github.com/tieto/sipe
They've be
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 08:29 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> Good work!
>
> It's easy to get Pidgin 2 to build against GST 1.x as I've had it for a while
It certainly looked easy when I glanced at it, although I really need to
be doing "real work" this week so I'm resisting the temptation t
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 10:57 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> File sharing works but immediately crashes when it finishes. I see an issue
> is
> already in github for that. If I can get additional debugging output I'll
> forward it
> off-list.
Thanks.
File sharing was working for me but
After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f22
updates-testing. Am I right in thinking that we *don't*
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 22:07 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> >
> Why you revert it in rawhide too?
>
> I could help with rebuilding dependencies. Is there other known
> troubles except so-name change?
It's more *rewriting* dependencies than rebuilding them. Especially
guacamole. You ha
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 11:35 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
> I am not sure how ocaml is generating code for PPC64, you could look in
> to split stack support, but at this time GCC does not implement split
> stack.
... for PPC64.
I wouldn't want to do it in OCaml before it's supported in GCC
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:45 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:30:25PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > If the compiler is single-threaded, and increasing the stack ulimit
> > fixes the problem, that implies that the default stack ulimit is less
&g
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 08:57 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is pthread_create used even for the main thread in the process (I
> thought the kernel created that). In any case threads aren't being
> used explicitly by this process.
>
> Anyway I guess the guard page is just a hole that causes the
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:52 -0400, David Airlie wrote:
> Otherwise I think this feature is a bit half baked as is.
I don't understand how you can make *any* decisions based on HTTP
reachability, without *first* picking up proxy settings from
DHCP/VPN/WPAD etc., poking them into PacRunner, and *u
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 09:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 21.04.2014 03:39, schrieb Lars Seipel:
> > Nicely aligning with the current firewall thread I noticed that one of
> > my machines was running the exim MTA for the last few days, dutifully
> > listening on all interfaces
>
> and now it
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs
> and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to
> the spec repository, I guess.
If you really need this, and don't have any basic editing/chec
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:40 +0100, Caterpillar wrote:
> The unique and most impotant negative feedback I had it when I
> upgraded a system from Fedora 14 to 15, that was the upgrade from
> Gnome 2 to Gnome 3.
> …
> Fedora community should test big transitions like Gnome 2->3 for a
> longer period o
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 05:18 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote:
> > One thing that doesn't seem to have been covered in the discussion —
> > what about third-party firstboot modules?
> >
> > For an install on a corporate machine we have a firstboot module which
> > asks for the Active Directory credentials
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:25 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Plasma-nm =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm
>
> Change owner(s): Jan Grulich , Lukáš Tinkl
>
>
> Replace current network applet in KDE with a new one and bring the latest
> news
>
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Thanks. Delayed response... I've finally got everything else working
> nicely on Fedora 19 and I'm looking at this. I see firstboot is still
> available, but it doesn't seem to *work*.
>
> First it wan
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 01:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> >> libproxy taken.
> >
> > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Would you m
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 16:49 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> > But it's actually relatively simple to hack around that for now with a
> > NM dispatcher script. Having libproxy-pacrunner available is the
> > important missing piece of the puzzle for now.
Sorry for delayed response. Please don't d
de and just asking libkrb5 "where is it today?".
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 05:18 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote:
> > > One thing that doesn't seem to have been covered in the discussion —
> > > what about third-party firstboot modules?
> > >
> > > For
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 14:44 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 07:23 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 09:27 +0100, Christof Damian wrote:
> >> Fixing them now will benefit all future releases and all the people
> >> living
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 05:01 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The appropriate place to discuss deliberate design decisions is a
> forum where said decisions are made, ie not Bugzilla.
Or a forum where said decisions can be overridden with a little more
sanity, such as FESCo.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 16:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If they do decide to keep the change, you could escalate it to FESCo.
> However, (speaking only for myself here) I would be VERY reluctant to
> override maintainers on their packages on something that is a design
> decision/judgement call. Wh
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So I'm writing a blog post on this topic ATM, and that really kinda
> brought home how messy this design is at present.
One thing that doesn't seem to have been covered in the discussion —
what about third-party firstboot modules?
For an
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 17:12 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > there was a release of libical 1.0 recently [1], and I'd like to update
> > rawhide with it. It seems to be API compatible with 0.48, they only
> > bumped the soname version due to versio
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 09:24 +0930, Glen Turner wrote:
>
> I'd also strongly encourage a design which makes it easy for a
> corporate-issued RPM to configure the authentication. For an example of
> something wonderful, NetworkManager has a one-file-per-ssid design so its
> easy for a RPM to drop in
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 05:38 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:24:33AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > How can I force the system not to recognize a USB2.0 flash memory
> device at USB1.1 speed?
>
> You can't - it's negotiated at the host controller level, the OS isn't
> invo
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 07:47 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> > even special locations for *particularly* braindamaged applications
> > (pidgin).
>
> Hmmm, we should probably fix that one to use the central stuff. David,
> if we've missed any others in Fedora 19, could you file RHBZ bugs?
I will, yes.
e not supposed to BR
the -devel packages by name, if you are using pkg-config.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
deve
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 15:39 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> We will also
> add compat openssl102 package so the applications and other
> dependencies which are not ported yet to the new API continue to work.
What plan do you have for libp11 and engine_pkcs11?
Packaging guidelines state that packages SH
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 16:39 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 16:13 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:06:13 +0100
> > David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 15:3
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 11:37 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Well... we certainly need to port it sooner or later although I
> understand that effort will be quite non-trivial.
You mean port libp11? That's already working against OpenSSL 1.1, isn't
it? We just need to ensure we can ship a version of lib
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 10:09 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> My current plan is to not ship such engine-pkcs11 package. We should
> try to move everything to OpenSSL 1.1 and ship the 1.0.2 only as a
> compat package for third party binaries without -devel and any extra
> bells and whistles. It would be a
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 12:29 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> My current plan is to just switch and rebuild fixing the FTBFS during
> that. I want to persuade some of my colleagues to help me with that
> (and of course community help is also welcome).
>
> Also we will be sharing the work with other downs
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 11:43 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> The libraries that should be preferred instead of arbitrary other
> crypto stacks are (in the order of the preference):
>
> 1. NSS
> 2. GNUTLS (with nettle as crypto backend, but nettle never used
> directly by applic
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 17:02 +, Ralf Senderek wrote:
>
> > What we should strive for is to limit the use of crypto to one of these
> > three libraries and avoid any additional ones with exception of
> > libgcrypt for gnupg2.
>
> This assumption ignores the fact that Cryptlib has joined Fedor
On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > At worst if the patching of a package is highly non-trivial and the
> > upstream is not responsive we might have to drop the package from
> > Fedora.
> >
> > We do not want to keep 1.0.2 devel around as that could make
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 16:29 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> We will work on porting the dependent packages to the new API. If by
> some reasonable deadline there are still some packages that are not
> dead by other reasons and we are unable to port them we can add -devel
> to the compat package. Note
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 21:59 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I'm rebasing gnutls in rawhide to gnutls-3.1.7. This is much awaited
> upgrade by many. However note that potentially patented ECC sources are
> removed.
Yay! at last! Thanks.
Although RFC6090 *really* ought to have solved the nonsense about
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 17:09 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:04:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 02/19/2013 04:32 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > >>>(3) For my code that uses st_ino, I need to ensure thi
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 09:27 +0100, Christof Damian wrote:
> Fixing them now will benefit all future releases and all the people
> living in non pure ASCII countries.
∄ pure ASCII countries.
It is incredibly naĩve to believe otherwise.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic sign
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 12:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 19 mars 2013 11:38, Ian Malone a écrit :
>
> > and holding up the release for what is basically a triviality seems a
> > bit silly.
>
> The perception correct UTF-8 handling is a triviality that should be
> worked on at some la
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 18:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Sure, I just meant it as a handy and clear demonstration of the
> principle that if you can compromise the environment of a user with
> sudo or other admin privileges, you're about 97% of the way to root in
> any case.
Right. Don't u
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 12:57 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Also, wasn't there an issue with the OpenSSL's licensing and GPL?
> > > If it still is, could it affect any of the packages that are now using
> > > libcurl?
> > There is this: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/22/license/
W
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:52 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Anyway, I guess we should move this discussion to some curl- or nss-related
> > channel...
>
> The question remains, if it makes sense to switch back to openssl, if the
> consequence i
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 11:57 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> that for example we run 20 servers on top of Fedora from mail, web, sfp
> over fileservers, routers, firewalls and *none* of them has GnuTLS
> installed at all - even not the build and deployment machine?
Ah, OK. I thought it was more
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:13 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Hello,
> for anyone interested in the subject and visiting DevConf in Brno on
> this Friday - we will be holding an informal meeting to gather use-cases
> for needed improvements in this area. We are interested in feedback from
> Fedora/RHEL
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
