Hello,
I'm David Demelier, I've been using Fedora since Fedora Core 2. I'm
active in the FOSS movement by participating in some open source
projects (FreeBSD, CMake, Mercurial, Duktape and some that I should
miss).
I think it was the time to start contributing to the distribution
Hello,
There is a major issue in tortoisehg 4.2 which makes most of the
software unusable [0][1].
It would be nice to have 4.2.1 in Fedora 26 as it's a small bugfix release.
Is there any chance that we get into it before the release or quickly
after? :-)
[0]
https://bitbucket.org/tortoise
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 07:12 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:21 AM Matthew Miller <
> mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> ...
> > That's why the general trend is *away* from email.
> >
> > The Foreman community recently switched away from mailing lists in
> this way,
> > and
le [1]
[0]: http://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/markand/OpenRCT2
[1]: http://hg.markand.fr/rpms/file/tip/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2.spec
Regards,
--
David Demelier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 05:22:05AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> What RPM are you building from?
I do rpmbuild -ba OpenRCT2.spec
--
David Demelier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
a place where you see that we must use this variable?
Anyway, it worked, I changed the CMake invocation to:
cmake ... \
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \
It built fine, thanks!
--
David Demelier
___
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Actually you should use the %cmake macro:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake
Thanks, this is indeed the correct solution.
--
David Demelier
___
devel mailin
Hello all,
Since systemd-networkd is a mature network system daemon nowadays,
NetworkManager can be avoided in many cases where people do not need
desktop features.
I propose to remove NetworkManager from the “Core” group and mark it as
optional or eventually move it into a dedicated group. Perha
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:59 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> the message doesn't give much motivation beside "can be avoided in
> many
> cases". I would be intrested in your exact criticism.
>
Hello,
Don't take this personally (I feel you thought some offense). I never
said NetworkManager sucks and
Hello all,
I was searching a very possible minimal dnf group for chroot builds. It
looks like the 'Core' group already minimal contains lots of packages
that may be unneeded in containers/chroot scenarios. For example:
- sssd,
- cronie,
- selinux packages,
- NetworkManager,
- firewalld
10 matches
Mail list logo