On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 10:54 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said:
> > NM can use old style /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*. Can't
> > you just write those out from your %post section? Or, if you want all
> > the NM features like WPA wireless config, you can
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 11:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jon Masters
> > wrote:
> > > Great. It works fine on a laptop, in general. But on a
> > > desktop/server/workstation that is connected for weeks at
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 13:02 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:43:41AM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> > 2010/8/27 Jesse Keating :
> > > That's strange. I use it on my laptop, which has a caching local DNS
> > > server (dnsmasq) and it works just fine. I do have a script in
> > >
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 19:58 +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> On 27/08/2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > NM doesn't (yet?) support:
> > - bridges: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558982
> > - vlans: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492377
>
> That would explain why I couldn't fig
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:00 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:57 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > I was participating in the Systemd Fedora Test Day and installed the
> > latest Fedora 14 build. I found a few problems (I will file bugs) but
> > before I file a bug about NetworkMa
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 19:58 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 08.09.2010 19:55, schrieb Dan Williams:
> > The expected way to do this is to use the config window in Anaconda,
> > create a new connection set up the way
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:12 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Paul Wouters
>
> > Stopping the firewall did not help me on ietf-v6ONLY though. I still got
> > not DNS entry in /etc/resolv.conf and on top of that my routing seemed to
> > not have a working default route.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > [paul@
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:46 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 10:37 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 30.07.11 10:31, Genes MailLists (li...@sapience.com) wrote:
> >
> http://cafbit.com/entry/rapid_dhcp_or_how_do
> >>>
>
> >
> > IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can d
But yes, it can help speed things up on wired, and
it can help determine what connection we should be associating with the
link as you describe.
Dan
> Nathaniel
>
> On Jul 30, 2011 6:45 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:46 -0400, Genes MailL
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 12:25 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 31.07.2011 12:17, schrieb David Woodhouse:
> > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can do the ARP magic, too.
> >
> > I don't think so. ConnMan doesn't remember the la
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 12:10 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:41 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > Dan, that works on wireless networks. On wired networks the ARP
> > technique determines *which* of the valid leases you should attempt to
> > restore.
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 17:12 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> > On 08/01/2011 07:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It seems like there's which has to happen after
> > > wake before NM even attempts to re-establish a connection, and that's
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:43 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> > On 08/03/2011 01:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The Ubuntu NM maintainer has posted a WIP patch that makes NM say it's
> >> connected immedi
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up openswan and
> xl2tpd
> manually and this works fine. However, bringing up the connection is not
> very
> comfortable and it would be much nicer to be able to use
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:50 -0400, Avesh Agarwal wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 05:09 AM, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
> > On 08/25/2011 13:57 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >&
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
>
> We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
> that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
> DNS infrastructure because all DNS caches would be circum
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:23 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> >> solve a part of the problem how can you even consider removing the
> >> ability for disabling dnssec when implementing and deploying and running
> >> dnssec increases the complexity times hundred
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:37 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 05:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
> >>
> >> We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes.
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:26 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > But I'm not really familiar with unbound. Is it a long-running service?
>
> Yes, It's a fully dnssec validating caching resolver. You start it at boot
> and lea
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:29 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:27:41AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > right. the big problem is not working around a broken network or a network
> > > with an attacker. The problem is false positives due to the ple
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 19:44 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of a (relatively) simple python utility called
> discspan[1] which I'd like to package for Fedora.
>
> It currently relies on HAL via dbus to determine when media is loaded
> and its capacity. I'm trying to remove the depe
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:13 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > udev replaced HAL, along with some additional helpers. udev has a
> > database too, much like HAL. You can use libudev or libgudev (if you
> > use glib) to
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 07:46 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:10:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > In general doing something like this is a bit backwards since networks
> > come and go and come and go in todays world, and we also don't want to
>
> This seems like a
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 21:22 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 13:08 -0500, Dan Williams a écrit :
>
> > If you architect a system that accounts for networking changing states,
> > then it works for *everyone*. If you depend on networking always being
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:18 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
> problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
> this box doesn't work anymore.
>
> I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the updat
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote
> >>> NM supports static IPs these days. So I think
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 05:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, R
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:35 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
> > deal with in these cases) than "some packets were lost". An option to
> > "persist connections despite something probably not actually existing"
> > would be nice for situations
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > > One thing I liked a lot with my ifconfig scripts/wpa_supplicant pairing
> > > is that when wireless is spotty, the network doesn't keep going up and
>
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 19:10 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > One thing I liked a lot with my ifconfig scripts/wpa_supplicant pairing
> > is that when wireless is spotty, the network doesn't keep going up and
> > down. Instead, applications see lots of dropped packets. When
> > re
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:01 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:58:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Ben Boecke
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user
> list.
>
> I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop
> is telling me and what ifconfig is telling me and what 'service
> network restart' i
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 19:21 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:30:02PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Looking at the code, the 4-second delay is only used when the device is
> > actually connected to something. State 3 == DISCONNECTED, state 2 ==
> >
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said:
> >> On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 22:10 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> 19.05.2011, 21:12, "n2xssvv.g02gfr12930" :
> > On 19/05/11 09:55, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I asked this question in NetworkManager mailing list, but everyone there
> >> seems to be busy, so I decided to ask here.
>
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 14:08 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 14.06.11 07:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > > > What's the problem of having a specific hostname set up at boot
> > > > time ?
> > > >
> > > > The user
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 09:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 21:23 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > systemd might be happy if you change it later, but other stuff is not.
> > The canonical example is X, where the hostname was used as the xauth key
> >
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:00 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 11 February 2010 00:49, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Mat Booth wrote:
> >> To be fair, it seems like you are updating KDE constantly. If the spin
> >> contains the packages available at the time it was spun, I'm not sure
> >> what more you can as
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 08:05 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 09:27:47PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Increasingly a number of broadband connections require usb_modeswitch to
> > > connect online
> > >
> >
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 09:44 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:50:21 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> (adding linux-usb to cc:, see below)
>
> > Increasingly a number of broadband connections require usb_modeswitch to
> > connect online
> >
> > http://who-t.blogspot.com/2010/0
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:05 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:42 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have taken over the maintainership from Robert, and the new
> > usb_modeswitch rpms are in rawhide now.
>
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:07 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:27:48 -0800
> Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > > > I have taken over the maintainership from Robert, and the new
> > > > usb_modeswitch rpms are in rawhide now.
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 16:03 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:07 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:27:48 -0800
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > > > > I have taken over the maintainership from Robert, and the new
> >
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 00:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/19/2010 04:26 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> >
> > Just to be sure: do this mean users with those dongles should have a
> > "works out of the box" experience with NetworkManager in F13?
> >
> >
> I don't know that. I believe it requi
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:18 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to get my k3715 to work in F12 or F13. I have filled this
> bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552456 . It
> reports by dmesg as a E620.
>
> The modem works fine in F11 with no usb_modeswi
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:53 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:27:38AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:18 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get my k3715 to work in F12
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:20 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > The log of the following update shows that it was submitted five times,
> > I assume with newer packages each time:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManag
Hi,
At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
enhanced capabilities like bonding, bridging, vlan, etc. This *does*
mean an API break, so packages will need to be updated for libnl3. The
majorit
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:41 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
> > At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
> > libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
> > enhanced
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:05 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
> > I believe libnl3 *might* be parallel installable; I've had conversations
> > with tgraf about how to make it so. I'll investigate once the upstream
> > git repo
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> 2011/11/8 Richard Hughes:
> >>> 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski:
> Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my sys
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 22:21 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 06:10 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
> > libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for th
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 22:39 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 06:43 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> >>
> >> So you say that both
> >>
> >> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
> >> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
> >>
> >> Shoudl wo
Hi,
It was recently brought to my attention that NM has an RPM dep on
ModemManager. I believe we added it long ago to ensure that users did
not lose 3G modem support when updating from NM 0.7.x (where NM had
internal 3G support) to 0.8.x (where that support was split out into
MM). These days the
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 23:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > People who don't have 3G modems and know they wont in the future have no
> > need of installing or running MM. Thus I'd like to remove the RPM dep
> > from NetworkManager, and instead
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 08:28 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > F15 was the first Linux i saw where "reboot" did not
> > work until you typed "kill 1" while praying!
>
> Can you point me to a bug report from you or anyone else that has been
> conf
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:27 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Can we please address the following bug that is almsot two years old.
> This bug causes long delays for people enabling IPV6, and causes
> Fedora to not get any connectivity on IPv6 only networks, unless you
> disable/reconfigure ip6tables ma
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Jerry James
>
> > Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
> > related to the issues discussed in this thread?
>
> Hard to tell, without (preferably debu
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:52 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >> * Jerry James
> >>
> >>> Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
&g
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
> > using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
> > small networks.
>
> This
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Dan Williams
>
> > 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
> > success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if
> > IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's co
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:47 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote:
> > Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it
> > that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to
> > think
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 10:07 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2012-03-14, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >> * Dan Williams
> >>
> >> > 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
>
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:46 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
> > >
> > > gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
> >
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > > NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:09 +0900, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> on 12/08/2010 08:51 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Should I be concerned about these?
> >
> > Dec 8 06:44:29 nbecker1 NetworkManager[22066]: [1291808669.539204]
> > [nm-manager.c:1332] user_proxy_init(): could not init user settings proxy:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:07 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 22:01, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
> This interesting though:
> $ ls
> -l /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.service
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 42 Oct 22
>
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
> manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured to start on boot. Is
> there something
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:46 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Hmm. This looks completely correct.
> >
> > I don't really understand why this check suceeds if you run it in
> > "systemd-notify --booted", but apparently doesn't if you run it
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 20:31 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure on which package I need to bugzilla this under. I have a
> feeling it should be NetworkManager, but I'd like to check as it may be
> down to a PolicyKit failure (or even dbus).
It could well be NM. Can you grab your /var/log/messa
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the
> > release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010. In order to enter
> > this phase, a
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:56 +0530, arvind iyer wrote:
> USB-MODEM from Huawei (Model: Huawei EC1261 ) does not work with
> fedora-12 (kernel 2.6.32.11-.fc12.i686.PAE)
>
>
> However an older version (Model: Huawei EC1260) works on the same
> kernel.
>
>
> The following are the output of /var/l
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 10:46 -0300, João Neto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have submitted a bug on Fedora Bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600656
>
> But i wonder if someone has had this problem before.
>
> This as ocurred after notebook suspend on KDE, and Network Manager do
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
> > be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
> > would be ideal for ge
Froyo's hotspot thing uses. Obviously we'd expect infrastructure/AP
mode to work.
> Dan Williams built 0.8.1-0.4 on June 25th, and that solved the problem
> nicely, but somehow this was not pushed as an update. Could one of the
> maintainers do it? Otherwise, if there's
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:52 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > F-13's NetworkManager is currently still at version
> > 0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13, which on my Sony netbook intermittently
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
> > missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
> > Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, p
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 13:22 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Looks great! I've been using this daily on Fedora 21 and I have to
> say it mostly works well EXCEPT for the captive portal detection stuff
> which is just horrendously bad, so I'm happy to see a new design that
> may work a lot better.
W
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 09:26 +0200, poma wrote:
> ModemManager
> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ModemManager
> - update to 1.3.0 git3dd6f93, almost ready for the new 1.4 release.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125426
I actually did a full stack rebuild yesterday for the late
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I
> tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wrong something.
>
> Here the log:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8044663&na
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:57 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi Dan.
>
> On 11/05/2014 06:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> I don't know how to fix these errors during I
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:09 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> I pushed:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/polkit.git/commit/?id=1224d7b427a507339087e2f72c481b560c85149b
> Built as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8072916
>
> Which makes polkit optional if NM (or anything else th
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:42 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 23.0
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
> > evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
> > were some config issues with
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:29 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to
> > disable it.
> >
>
> Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any conflicts with
/21-connectivity-local.conf
> > connectivity interval 0
> > systemctl reload NetworkManager
>
> Take a look at
> https://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2015/02/16/networkmanager-for-administrators-part-1
> it's Dan Williams' blog post I mentioned earlier. According to that,
> y
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 09:12 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 09:06 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Sergio Pascual said:
> >> I was wondering what is the "correct" way of enabling WOL on a network
> >> card.
> >
> > I think it is enabled by default. At least, I didn't do any
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 16:27 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2015, at 12:23 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 01:49:57PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >> If you go back through the previous glibc bugs, you'll find:
> >>
> >> https://sourceware.org/bugz
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
> > mostly due to lack of time for the various parties to sit down and
> > plan and then program this furt
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:20 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > NetworkManager is pure network configuration manager in this scenario.
> > We don't expect nor want NM to handle /etc/resolv.conf. We will only get
> > the current network con
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >>> decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
> >>> mostly due to lack of time for the va
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >>> decision needs to then be made by the
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately the Proposal doesn't say anything about how this will
> > actually work, which is something NetworkManager needs to know. It also
> > fails to ad
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:41 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> > decision needs to
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:57 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 12.6.2015 18:53, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:17 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> On 12.06.2015 18:58, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> >> On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:32 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> >> That is why HTTP redirection and DNS failure have to be detected by
> >> whatever is the "hot spot detector". Both items weigh in on triggering
> >
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot
> has been approved for Fedora 18.
>
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
> ===
>
>
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:19 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:05:57 -0400
> Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > Yes this is all good 'n' nice.
> >
> > The point is, can we/should we/want we make this the default ?
> > (And work on integrating NM -> unbound automatic configuration ?)
>
> I'
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:24 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
> > or will be common enough.
> >
> > The 2 use cases for which a properly configurable and dynamically
> > changeable cachi
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
