Hallo,
my name is Christoph Karl.
I am a long time Fedora user, but I plan to change to CentOS 8.
So I would like to see some more packages in the EPEL repo.
So I plan to help with this as a co-maintainer.
I have a little bit experience with packaging,
but I am on may way learning more.
First
z-Lezcano wrote:
Hi all,
This wants to go to a new owner:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qjackctl
I am the "official" maintainer, something I had completely forgotten
about (this was a VERY long time ago). Orcan (Ogetbil) took care of it
for a long time but now Christoph Karl (c
+1
Am 07.07.23 um 13:05 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
"Privacy-preserving Telemetry" is an oxymoron. No such thing exists.
Telemetry is always an invasion of privacy, and as such, completely
unacceptable in a Free Software operating system. All the more if it is
mandatory or opt-out rather tha
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
At least I was planning to support CentOS via EPEL as
a kind of "Fedora LTS".
Best Regards
Christoph
__
Hello!
On 09.12.20 18:08, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
For those that want the equivalent of a point release,
I would think they should be able to write an ansible
script to upgrade to the point release of packages
that EL 8.x ship with.
Just had the same idea. ;-)
So if I only upgrade to the point
Hello!
Me having this issue also.
But only in firefox and thunderbird, other appls seems to work.
Do you have a link, bugzilla or so?
Thank you
Best Regrads
Christoph
Am 09.09.20 um 16:51 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
On 08.09.2020 17:28, Ben Cotton wrote:
Change the default session sel
Hello everyone!
I want to un-retire the package python-pyswip.
According to "dead.package" the reason for retiring this package is/was:
"SWI Prolog (package pl) has been retired from Fedora, this package
provided Python bindings for SWI Prolog."
I checked this with Jerry James (maintainer of SW
Hello,
On 27.01.21 17:17, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I wonder, what would be the sentiment if I proposed to deprecated the
`fedpkg local` command. I don't think it should be used. Mock should be
the preferred way. Would there be anybody really missing this
functionality?
For me even a step further:
I
Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime:
Hello,
I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided
by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar.
Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster.
+1
Christoph
Hello!
On 03.03.21 at 15:07 Carol Bouchard wrote:
*/* Default stack size for a signal handler: sysconf (SC_SIGSTKSZ). */#
undef SIGSTKSZ# define SIGSTKSZ sysconf (_SC_SIGSTKSZ)*
Same for package rcs.
(Detected by upcoming autoconf-2.71 copr build.)
Christoph
_
Hi!
Trying to fix two security issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194953
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955611
I made an unintended soname bump in f32.
As far as I have seen, this is only in f32.
Carl Georg help me and already rebuild:
audacious-plugins-3.10.1-8
Hello!
I have started the process to update fluidsynth to fluidsynth-2.2.1 on
rawhide with a build in the f35-build-side-41995 side tag.
Upstream has again a soname bump:
libfluidsynth.so.2 ---> libfluidsynth.so.3
Dependant packages are:
>sudo dnf repoquery --source --whatrequires '*libfluidsy
Hi!
On 04.06.21 at 19:11 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Release engineering has just enabled a cron job to remove koji side tags
that are older than 30 days or have no builds tagged into them.
Is this 30 days after creating or last write access or last read access?
Thank you
Best Regards
Christoph
_
Hello!
Works for me:
Installieren100 Pakete
Aktualisieren 4705 Pakete
Entfernen 7 Pakete
Zurücksetzen 9 Pakete
Gesamte Downloadgröße: 6.8 G
Best Regards
Christoph
Am 07.09.21 um 18:14 schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of you
Hi!
I have written and also tried to solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293749
but I am somehow stuck.
I reinstalled a fresh rawhide (from
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240709.n.0.iso)
but I still get the following:
RPM does not know about this directory:
$ rpm -qf
Hi!
Thank you for the clarification.
How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
having both files/directories below /xyz/?
I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
Is this rule general valid or are there exceptions?
Icon sizes: https://bugzilla.redhat.
+1
Am 01.04.24 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Schmit:
One approach:
1. do the build
2. do the install
3. generate the RPMs
4. quarantine the RPMs so they're safe from modification
- I believe this could be done via SELinux policy
- there are probably other mechanisms
5. run the tests
- for S
Hi!
+1
The sequence must be: measure -> think -> act.
Not:
act (in panic) ->
think (oh, that ist not the correct way, or even worse: oh, this is the
way the attacker wants us to go.)
measure (we have a weakness)
Best regards
Christoph
Am 04.04.24 um 20:11 schrieb Leon Fauster via devel:
One
Hi!
I tried to find out which files on my upgraded fc40 installation are not
installed via dnf/rpm.
The list is surprisingly long.
Main reasons are symlinks and directories not defined in the spec file.
A quick check shows that this is also the case with a fresh installation.
I see three reason
Hi!
Am 01.05.24 um 19:58 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:21 AM Christoph Karl via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I tried to find out which files on my upgraded fc40 installation are not
installed via dnf/rpm.
The list is surprisingly long.
Perha
ou for any support.
Best Regards,
Christoph Karl
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-con
21 matches
Mail list logo
