Hi all,
On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm just
> asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> the change and ever
Hi all,
I'd like to briefly introduce myself to the Fedora developer community. I'm
Christoph, 37 years old, based in Nuremberg (Germany). I often go by the
pseudonym 'sicherha'.
With a degree in computer science, I originally stuck around in academia
before leaving with a PhD in the field of o
Hi list,
I'm trying to build mold for epel8. A bunch of mold's unit tests produce
statically linked 32-bit binaries, so on x86_64 we need a build dependency on
a static multilib glibc.
I have learnt that multilib build dependencies are a tricky thing in Koji, and
the only solution I have found
22 19:08:39 CET Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
>
> > * Christoph Erhardt:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We do not support cross-building, so you'd have to use a 32-bit builder
> > for building 32-bit binaries (which does n
Hi Florian,
> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
> together completely from scratch, without help from i686 RPM packages).
alright, thank you for clarifying!
Curiously though, the Koji buil
Hi list,
the recent mimalloc update from 2.0.3 to 2.0.5 has brought a subtle, yet
consequential, soname change (or rather addition) that affects the package's
`Provides:` list.
mimalloc-2.0.3-1 contains the library file
* `/usr/lib64/libmimalloc.so.2.0`
... and thus provides:
* `libmimalloc.so.
Hi all,
I'm willing to revive python-jenkins-job-builder by updating it to the latest
release 4.0.0 and backporting an upstream patch.
I already have a working Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/
sicherha/python-jenkins-job-builder/packages/
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:00:18AM +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm willing to revive python-jenkins-job-builder by updating it to the
> >latest
release 4.0.0 and backporting an upstream patch.
> >
Hi Vitaly,
if I understand the proposal correctly, the consequences will be far less
dramatic than you believe.
> So all Fedora packages will take 2x (x86_64-v1, x86_64-v2) disk space?
> Am I right?
1. Not all packages but only those whose maintainers explicitly opt in.
2. The duplication will
On Sunday 12 January 2025 21:25:17 Central European Standard Time Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > My concern is that this defeats most methods of observability. It's
> > essentially the same as the double-fork problem we used to have with
> > system services. The stub will fork out and exec
10 matches
Mail list logo
