On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 19:14, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:09 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>> If you want to tweak your UI, either use dconf/GConf, or wait until
>> Vincent writes (or start writing it, the control-center API is
>> exported :):
>> http://www.hadess.net/2010/02
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 19:19, Remi Collet wrote:
> php-channel-phpunit
> php-pecl-xdebug -- PECL package for debugging PHP scripts
I can help co-maintaining these if you like. As far as I see those are
the only one I use.
If you need a hand with other packages on the list or from your
extensive
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:50, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
> I add himself as co-maintainer of php-pecl-xdebug.
> And If you want, can help with some more packages. Please say, if you want.
> Primarily it may be: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid*.
Yes, I can co-maintain them too. I wil
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC"
https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:56, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 2010/8/13 Garrett Holmstrom :
>> On 8/12/2010 9:16, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 23:06, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>> If they like a faster bootup, then yes, they will. And I as a
>> workstation user like it.
>>
>
> [citation needed]
>
> I asked for this and was told by developers they were reluctant to post
> the data.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:11, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if something like the following exists or is it
> possible to display the following for each packager:
>
> Package EL-6 EL-5 F-14 F-13
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/rpmphp/all.php?what=shakthimaan
--
d
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 19:59, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:36:40PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> Gregdek mentioned voter fatigue on FAB a while back. I know exactly what
>> he's talking about though I'm not quite sure how to fix it. I suppose
>> meeting fatigue isn't much d
I would like to retire Armangil's podcatcher:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/podcatcher
There has not been a release since 2009 and I don't use it any more.
Should I just release ownership from pkgdb or follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 14.5.2011 23:23, Andreas Tunek napsal(a):
>> If I understand correctly, my computer (2011 27 inch iMac) has an
>> integrated intel GPU, but Fedora is using the Radeon GPU. Is there any
>> way what GPU you use? I did not find any documentation
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 13:16, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Some situations where I and others have used direct stable pushes in the
> past and where I think they're really warranted and should be used:
> * A new package which doesn't replace anything, and which I verified to work
> fine for me. It's cle
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 00:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:45 -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
>> As a maintainer I have seen several of my packages sit in updates testing for
>> over 2 weeks with no comments and no karma. In fact they sat so long I got
>> nag mail about not pus
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 20:12, Chris Adams wrote:
> Why not handle those cases similar to how GNOME and Firefox (and IIRC
> OpenOffice.org?) have been handled in the past, where a test/RC release
> was in Fedora leading up to the Fedora release, and the "final" upstream
> release is pushed as an u
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:21, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Then I discovered an .rpmnew file in /etc
> (sorry I forgot what it was but it was about layouts). I guess that an
> old configuration file was kept in /etc when the keyboard layout
> software (what is it?) got updated, and the old configuratio
I can take:
- sphinx
- siege
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 20:20, Joshua C. wrote:
> Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14?
or 2.6.37 even :-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/3/12 Michał Piotrowski :
> W dniu 11 marca 2011 15:19 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a strange problem in php -> sphinx communication:
>
> Do anyone uses this successfully on rawhide/F15?
I use it in F14 & EPEL5.
Are you using the php client library from sphinx-
2011/3/12 Michał Piotrowski :
>>
>> Are you using the php client library from sphinx-php or one bundled by
>> the software you are using?
>
> I'm using plugin for symfony framework.
that is where I had the problem too, I used a older version for now.
>> This usually happens when the php files doe
I would find it interesting too. Not only about the usage of my
packages, but it might also be interesting to know what packages are
installed from other repositories (fusion, adobe, skype, remi, ...) .
I think it would help to make decisions about what packages to keep
supporting or include in th
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:17, Alexander Kahl wrote:
> php-channel-phing -- Adds phing channel to PEAR
> php-channel-phpdb -- Adds phpdb channel to PEAR
> php-channel-symfony -- Adds symfony project channel to PEAR
> php-pear-creole -- A database abstraction layer for PHP5
> php-pear-pake -- PHP5
I will try to sort it out this evening.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 14:46, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 27/05/2010 12:40, Christof Damian a écrit :
>> I will take:
>> - php-channel-symfony
>
> Great.
> Can you please ask for EL-6 for it ? (and ask for build)
> See https://bugzi
I am reposting this from fedora php-devel list to get a bigger
audience. My questions are not that PHP specific:
I got two questions regarding my effort to package more of the php-qa
packages for fedora.
I have made a package for phpUnderControl now, but to use it you still
have to install Cruis
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 23:52, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The obvious response here is 'so, package CruiseControl too!' If you
> can't package CruiseControl, then you shouldn't package phpUnderControl;
> it's frowned upon / not allowed (I can never remember which) to package
> something which require
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 23:57, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>
> Not necessary at all. The current url is
> pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and that works with git:// and
> ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the
> current d
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:29, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [cdamian] sphinx: libsphinxclient-0.9.9-1.fc13.x86_64
this should be fixed in rawhide now
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 00:33, Roland McGrath wrote:
> My opinion is that a branch called F-/master is the nicest thing.
> Actually, all else being equal, I'd probably go for it being called
> f/master, since gratuitous caps and punctuation in branch names is
> not a normal git convention. (But I
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:01, Hans Ulrich Niedermann
wrote:
>
> Count me in on this reminder:
>
> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
I like that one.
There is nothing worse that keeping code that doesn't do anything.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:55, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>> This should probably say "systemd for F16"
>
> +1 FWIW. I'm not a huge sysv fanboi either, but I do care about the
> experience of sysadmins and the upstream for other projects, and I would
> like to see some soak time for this before everyon
Thank you for all the work.
I am currently in the process of convincing my employer to change from
svn to git and know how much work this is. Running git-svn clone alone
takes a few weeks for us.
I will check out all my packages on the weekend.
Happy Branching!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 02:44 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
>> Thank you for all the work.
>>
>> I am currently in the process of convincing my employer to change from
>> svn to git and know how much work this is. Running git
I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
Works good, but "fedpkg build" fails for me.
It complains that it can't retrieve the sources:
http://koji.stg.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2239266&name=root.log&offset=-4000
When I open the URL open with firefox/curl t
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 16:18, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> Excerpts from Christof Damian's message of Fri Jul 30 16:10:44 +0200 2010:
>> I am trying to update one of my packages with git for the first time.
>> Works good, but "fedpkg build" fails for me.
>>
>> It complains that it can't retrieve
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 15:29, Mike McGrath wrote:
> You need the newer version of fedora-packager. Note your connect string
> is "pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org" the newer version will have you hitting
> "pkgs.fedoraproject.org"
>
it might be good to put something about this on the wiki. I also had
I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
Due to a job with more responsibilities and less Red Hat, Fedora and PHP,
I don't have the time needed to keep up with the Fedora Next and PHP
ecosystem changes.
It wa
On 9 October 2014 15:03, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 05:21 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
>>
>> mediawiki-wikicalendar -- Simple calendar extension for mediawiki (
>> master f21 f20 f19 el6 el5 )
>
>
> I noticed you are the upstream for this and it seems l
15:55, Shawn Iwinski wrote:
> You can assign the remaining php-* ones that Remi didn't take to me if you
> would like.
>
> On Oct 9, 2014 6:22 AM, "Christof Damian" wrote:
>>
>> I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
>>
Thanks Tuan. It is yours now.
On 10 October 2014 03:51, Truong Anh. Tuan wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christof Damian"
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>
>> Cc: "Fedora PHP development team"
On 19 March 2013 08:30, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 19 mars 2013 02:24, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>
>> And is fixing this apostrophe issue going to have some clear benefit
>> anywhere else?
>
> Fixing an apostrophe – no
> Fixing our UTF-8 handling – definitely yes
I expected both of these thin
37 matches
Mail list logo
