Re: Purging the F13 orphans

Hi, On 01/28/2010 08:25 AM, David Juran wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp > > Was gnome-common and gtk-sharp really intended to be orphaned? Removing > them seem to break quite a lot (large parts of gnome and e.g. f-spot, > respectivel

Re: Out of action for a while & mono heads up

Hi Paul, On 08/04/2010 10:22 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Onto something else, mono 2.8 is due out in September so Novell are > going to be releasing a 2.7 release candidate/test candidate series at > some point either late this week or early next. Please remember that the > 2.8 branch will not have

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

Hi, On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:20:54 -0400 > Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and >> banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13. I estimate that this >> will close about half our open bugs. Doing this will r

Re: Any comments about the latest version of mono on my site?

Hi Paul, On 10/06/2010 04:26 PM, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > A couple of days back I uploaded preview 8 of mono-2.8 for comments but > have heard nothing back. The move to 2.8 will require a good number of > rebuilds as 2.8 has had all the .NET 1.1 stuff removed. Do all mono packages have to be reco

Multilib issue with hard-coded paths in mash script

Hi, During the F14 release cycle gtk2 was updated from 2.20.x to 2.22.x. During this change gdk-pixbuf2 was split off into a separate package and the location of the gdk-pixbuf loaders has changed from: F13: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/ to F14: /usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders This cau

Re: Orphaned: vpnc

Hi, On 08/30/2011 01:42 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Although I use vpnc daily, I only need/use the old version in RHEL 5, > and I don't have a machine on which I can conveniently study Fedora > bug reports. Therefore I have released ownership of this package in > Fedora 14-17. Since I have v

Re: Orphaned: vpnc

Hi David, On 08/31/2011 09:37 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 02:42 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: >> I have looked at the list of open bugs for vpnc and it looks like that >> there are a couple of packaging issues, some problems with the >> vpnc-script

Re: gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 and gnome-python2-gtkmozembed removed

Hi, On 09/09/2011 06:40 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its > broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages. > > - gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already >retired in F16+. > - gnome-python2-gtkmozem

Re: synergy-plu, synergy, and gnome3

Hi Laine, On 10/17/2011 08:01 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > The version of synergy-plus currently in Fedora doesn't work well with > gnome3; I had noticed this because I couldn't get the mouse past the > menubar to an alternate screen configured to be "north", but there are > other problems as well:

Re: gpx-viewer status?

Hi, On 04/25/2011 02:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Package gpx-viewer in Fedora 15 has been retired by fab > Package gpx-viewer in Fedora 14 has been retired by fab > Package gpx-viewer in Fedora 13 has been retired by fab > Please complete the package end-of-life procedure, I have just start

Thunderbird updates mixed up in F14

Hi, Beginning of today "package-cleanup --orphans" reports thunderbird-3.1.10-1.fc14.i686 as orphan in F14. "yum clean all; yum list thunderbird" reports thunderbird-3.1.9-2.fc14 as newest thunderbird package in the repositories. However, at one point in time thunderbird-3.1.10-1.fc14.i686 must h

Re: Thunderbird updates mixed up in F14

On 05/01/2011 10:38 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Rather find and fix the bug that is the cause of this. There have been >> a few updates like that recently, again. >> >> The 3.1.10-1.fc14 package is tagged dist-f14-updates already: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/bui

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

Hi, On 06/20/2011 07:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on > IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken. > (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need > a cvsadmin to reas

Deprecating podsleuth and ipod-sharp in rawhide

Hi, I'm going to deprecate podsleuth and ipod-sharp in rawhide. Banshee has switched to libgpod(-sharp) and no other package depends on these two packages. Are there any objections? Best regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Unorphaning packages

Hi Ben, On 07/06/2011 10:27 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > googlecl (if chkr wants maintainership, that's fine, I'll wait until > Friday to take it Thanks for the heads-up! I would like to keep maintaining it so I have taken ownership for now. If you would like to co-maintain it, I will certainly appr

Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packa ges looking for new owners

Hi, On 02/03/2010 12:15 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > * gnome-do -- Quick launch and search > * notify-sharp -- A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications > * solfege -- Music education software I have taken these. Best regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

Hi Luke, On 02/18/2010 10:08 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote: >> On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my >>> updates". In the list I see a recent package I pu

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

Hi, On 02/21/2010 02:15 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > == > Broken packages in fedora-updates-12-i386: > mono-moonlight-2.4.3.1-1.fc12.i686 requires mono-core = 0:2.4.3.1-

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

Hi, On 02/21/2010 02:15 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > == [...] > Broken packages in fedora-12-x86_64: > > monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.1.0-1.fc12.i686 requires > mono(Mon

Re: cisco vpn because of ipsec over tcp

Hi, Fedora ships the open source "vpnc" client which supports the Cisco VPN environment. I'm using it daily and it works for me without any problems. There is also a proprietary client from Cisco: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/index.html . On 11/14/2011 06:34 PM, Tomasz T

Build failure if STABS debug symbols are found

Hi, during the build of the new scummvm release we run into the following build issue: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3507060&name=build.log + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/scummvm-1.4.0 extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILD

Review Swap

Hi, I'd like to offer a review swap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765625 python-pymodbus - A Modbus Protocol Stack in Python It is a simple python package, so it should be quite an easy review. ;-) Thanks! Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: Multilib issue with hard-coded paths in mash script

Hi, On 11/08/2010 11:15 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> 1. Specifically with respect to the problem with gdk-pixbuf: Should the >> gdk-pixbuf loaders be multilib or not? If yes, the mash script must be >> adjusted. > > The loaders are shared objects, and the 64-bit modules won't help you on > 32-b

Re: gtkhtml-sharp (gnome-desktop-sharp)

Hi, On 03/09/2011 11:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Currently, this is disabled in rawhide as it is linking to the gtkhtml3 API. > > Does anyone know if this ban has been lifted yet or is the mono stack > going to be hobbled because of it for a while longer? (no > gnome-desktop-sharp == no mono-too

Re: gthumb now orphaned?

Hi, On 07/17/2010 01:27 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > One of the gthumb bug (588039) has been generating a lot of duplicate bug > entries in Bugzilla -- 2.11.x versions prior to 2.11.4 fail at startup on > DRI-less systems due to a hard reliance on Clutter (the same way mutter > would fai

Re: Python 2.7 rebuild: maintainer help needed (please!)

On 07/23/2010 08:07 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > I've been running mass rebuilds of python-using packages against python > 2.7 [1] > > We're now down to 202 failing builds, so I'm attaching a by-maintainer > report on them. chkr (1): anki Fixed & built: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buil

Re: unresponsive maintainer: chkr

Hi Nikos, I'm sorry that I haven't responded earlier. I was under the impression that your request only affected EPEL and that you have contacted the EPEL maintainer now. I just re-read the conversation - it looks like that I have overseen that the request was indeed for the fedora branches (at le

Re: downgrade version of gthumb in fedora 21 final?

Hi, On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 13:13 -0800, James Patterson wrote: >> >> Is it too late to downgrade gthumb in Fedora 21 to 3.2.x? >> >> The version in Fedora is really slow. I posted a bug with more info: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Unretiring gpx-viewer / Review Swap

Hi, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer. The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedora releases: https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gpx-viewer.git/tree/dea

Re: [HEADS UP] python-matplotlib-2.0.0 major update

Hi, On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > I've just pushed (but not built) python-matplotlib-2.0.0b4 to rawhide. > I'll be attempting to rebuild all the affected packages locally to > test if they're compatible. In the meantime, feel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

Hi, On 02/24/2013 11:19 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package celt071 (orphan) I picked up celt071 (used by mumble). > Package dbus-sharp (orphan) > comaintained by: chkr I took dbus-sharp, too. Regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

Re: Un-retiring ice and mumble?

Hi Carlos, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice. > > I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort. > So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them > unless anyone objects. > > Is there any rea

Orphaned package "solfege"

Hi, I have orphaned the package "solfege" (a small music education tool to learn to hear intervals, rhythms, ...). It does not build anymore [1] and there is no upstream activity since a few years. Last stable version (3.22.2) is from 2013 [2] Last unstable version (3.23.4) is from 2016 [3] Last

Unretire lua-ldap

Hello, According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ I'd like to announce that I'm going to unretire the package "lua-ldap". I didn't find a concrete reason why it was removed, it looks like it was retired because it was orphaned for too long.

Intent to orphan vpnc

Hello, vpnc is a VPN client which can be used with certain VPN devices: https://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ The last co-maintainer who actively maintained the package for the last few years just stepped back. Since I don't have a use case for it anymore (and no ability for testing), I'm g

Unretire golly

Hello, According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ I'd like to announce that I'm going to unretire the package "golly". It was retired because it was FTBFS for too long: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675048 Probably because upst

License update: scummvm and scummvm-tools

Hello, beginning with scummvm version 2.6.0, the license for the packages scummvm and scummvm-tools have been changed as follows: scummvm: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD and OFL and MIT and ISC" scummvm-tools: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT" Best regards, Christian ___

License update: scummvm

As discussed on the Fedora Legal mailing list, I updated the license tag of scummvm from "GPLv2+" to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2.1+ and GPLv3+ and BSD and OFL". GPLv3 and OFL are only used for font files. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

License update: scummvm

Hello, beginning with version 2.5.0, the license for the package scummvm has been changed to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and BSD and OFL and MIT and ISC" Best regards, Christian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

License update: svummvm-tools

Hello, beginning with version 2.5.0, the license for the package scummvm-tools has been changed to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT" Best regards, Christian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@

License change: scummvm/scummvm-tools

Hi, scummvm-2.9.0: - added: BSL-1.0 - now: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache-2.0 AND BSL-1.0 scummvm-tools-2.9.0 - added: BSD-2-Clause - now: License: