On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 16:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> * This policy of sticking religiously to upstream means we are not shipping
> KDE integration for Firefox, despite patches from openSUSE existing. This
> makes Firefox suck under KDE. Our Firefox maintainers refuse to do anything
> about i
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Tyler wrote:
> > If you (or whoever is interested) can't get those patches through the
> > upstream review process for technical reasons, then perhaps they're ugly
> > patches. If you can't get them
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:00 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 09/01/10 16:46, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>> rpm2cpio package | cpio -i -
> >>
> >> Isn't that easy, you'll have to do a bunch of fixups after doing so to
> >> have things actually work.
> >
> > Usually not. Nine times out of ten, (probably
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. The Test Day cycle for Fedora 16 will open shortly, and we're
> putting out the call for anyone who has an idea for a Test Day. There
> are many open slots on the schedule -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_16_test_day
I just found out about the package "brandy" and was saddened to realize
that I missed the orphan-deprecation announcement. I'd like to take this
one.
Oddly, I see that the dead.package file states that:
This package was retired on 2011-07-25 due to it being unable to
build this pa
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 18:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:23 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
>
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On the week of Aug 7 David Shein and I will be at POSSE-RIT teaching
> > professors how open source communities work. On
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> [0] We're making a "one time" incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
> the "hard float" ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (commonly
> referred to as the ARM EABI - but that doesn't actually exist as a
> name). The procedure call st
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:17 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Join us on Friday to celebrate July with another in our series of VFADs!
Hi Jon,
Just a heads up that you won't have many Canadians joining you -- July 1
is Canada Day, a *big* party date on our calendar.
-Chris
--
devel ma
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 01:51 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folk,
>
> I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
>
> For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
> fsck etc), but for novies it's h
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 12:45 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 13:37:11 -0400,
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 10:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit
> > > to Fedora. It seems to
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 00:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 12:18 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> >
> > Let's not be brash. If we want to ship TB with one small patch, it's a
> > simple matter of asking.
>
> If it was so simple, why haven't we do
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You mean "compliance" with Mozilla's own "standards" such as APNG which
> require a bundled hacked version of a system library to support?
Kevin, you keep bringing up APNG, so let me address that one. I know the
story because the Mozilla im
The ARM Secondary Arch project[0] is working on an F15 release for the
existing armv5tel architecture as well as the new armv7hl architecture
(with hardfp ABI). This effort has been previously announced and is
ongoing. A number of minor package changes are required as a result of
this effort:
(1)
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 16:53 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:36:40PM +0530, Tirtha Chatterjee wrote:
>
> > Can Plymouth be modified so that it shows up during hibernation and
> > wake-up too? In that case, can anyone guide me on how to do it? I am
> > ready to do the codi
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 21:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> from here
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
> I see
> /usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :
>
> what does mean this part of the code "|| :" ?
|| is logical-OR with optimization (i.e
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:15 +0100, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:50 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
> Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
> > 16.01.2011 16:21, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
> > > Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
>
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 17:37 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > On 03/20/2012 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>
> >> That said, I considera cross-building environment for secondary arch to
> >> be inevitable, which would at least help for the clas
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:21 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> drago01 píše v Út 20. 03. 2012 v 17:57 +0100:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > > On 03/20/2012 09:37 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm a big fan of cross compilation, but introducing it into Fedora in
> > >>
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 05:04 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > just a side note - I was told by an OpenSUSE on ARM person that they
> > use
> > x86 boxes with the user-space qemu virtual machine. It works quite
> > fast,
> > but still needs some hacking eg. in test-sui
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 02:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> And finally, for our build speed issue, the practical consideration will be
> whether the parallelism will actually speed our builds up. Right now our
> builds are either serial or have portions parallelized with "make -j", which
> assumes
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 16:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
>
> Despite the fact that this is pretty wild guess, I don't think that
> Fedora should only care about what's happening on the developed
> countries and ignore the rest of the world.
I don't think this is necessarily a developed-vs-develop
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I started looking at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/HowToQemu
>
> VM starts okay in F16 with setsebool -P virt_use_execmem=on
>
> But the image is a Fedora 12 system. Any updated images out there?
New yum-install
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:07 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Some requisite patches weren't upstream in time for Fedora 19's 3.9 GA
> kernel, but are in the 3.10 update. This means Arndale should be fully
> supportable in Fedora 20. Meanwhile, there is an F19 remix for Arndale
> using a later k
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:28 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 10:15 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> > I think that's s/Arndale/Chromebook/
>
> Same SoC, different peripherals sticking out.
Right -- but also different boot processes. I was just noting that the
image fo
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 23:42 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Just in case, let's say we have the package foo-1.0 if I make a
> scratch build of package foo-1.1, that doesn't count at all, isn't
> it?
> I mean can I send an update foo-.1.1 completely different of the
> foo-1.1 sent as a scratch bui
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 18:47 +0530, magina antimage wrote:
> Hi,
> I have ported fedora for my target board,
>i am getting high CPU utilisation(30-35%) even when my system is
> idle (no gnome / X session).
> i used top command to see which process is consuming CPU,but couldn't
> find any.
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
