On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:19 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik said:
> > Data centers have /plenty/ of ancient video solutions out there, and
> > basic video support is needed.
>
> How many data centers run X on servers? I know I don't; they all boot
> runlevel 3 and just
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 20:36 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> first sorry for some bad words from mine, but this is how i feel in a
> situation not
> knowing how to act since upgraded short ago to F14 in the hope get my energy
> refreshed staying there for some months and now realizing i will newer g
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:05 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> It all looks very pretty though.
Maybe someone can answer this...
All of the fade and animation effects that a lot of the
toolkits/desktops are using these days seem like they're making the
responsiveness substantially worse. I'm not refe
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 10:00 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frank Murphy wrote:
> > Bookmark this: http://ss64.com/bash/
> I know about :) This idea just try for standartization of command
> names... I know about posix and LSB, but these standards
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 19:12 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (becaus
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:12 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > > Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
> > > wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
> > > than X over the network
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:05 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> >
> > And where does that sit in the architecture?
> >
> > Looking over the architecture page (2nd figure) it looks like the only
> &g
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:19 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:01 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > And I'm saying you can get the network remoting effect you like in X, in
> > > Wayland
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:24 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:14:32PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:05 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > > >
> >
On 04/02/2012 07:44 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:34:59PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:0
On 04/03/2012 10:31 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
/tmp is a like a litter box. From a user perspective, I'm happy to have it
emptied regularly, because clearly the cats don't clean up their own doodles.
That one of the cats might think he's deposited something valuable that he'll
come back for somed
On 04/06/2012 07:47 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 04/06/2012 11:14 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:58 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F
On 04/06/2012 02:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
What happens to /tmp on tmpfs when real memory and swap are completely
consumed?
I assume it would get an -ENOSPC...but with RAM and swap being full I
don't expect that the end user would ever see the error before the
machine bogged down to the po
On 05/31/2012 08:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 31.05.12 08:51, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:55:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Now /var/tmp should be "more persistent" which we don't need,
Correct, using /var/tmp is wrong and a mistake.
On 06/01/2012 08:12 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
my biggest problem was that tmpfs by
default allocates half of physical RAM for partition. So I just
allocated big enough swap and added a line to /etc/fstab with
appropriate size= option.
And how is a random user supposed to know this? So if
On 06/01/2012 10:23 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
my biggest problem was that tmpfs by
default allocates half of physical RAM for partition. So I just
allocated big enough swap and added a line to /etc/fstab with
appropriate size
On 06/01/2012 11:35 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Because that disk activity only happens when the kernel decides that
it wants the memory for something else it doesn't happen at all in a
great many cases especially for short lived files.
...
The feature may be adopted/promoted on the basis of S
On 06/01/2012 11:52 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:21AM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
Well, since I'm probably going to turn it off, can someone give me a
good reason why it should be turned _on_ by default? For me, the
"Benefit to Fedora" bullets are
On 06/01/2012 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I think most of the noise in this flame thread is due to a
misunderstanding how modern memory management works and the assumption
that having an explicit size limit on /tmp was a bad thing, even though
it actually is a good thing... In fact, we
on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database:
we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of
/etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really
an option for us. I couldn't find an easy way to look up the data in
ldap for that data
I'll investigate it when we get to another system change but since its
working on the current servers I'm not touching it :)
By the time we do an OS refresh I'll probably try moving to IPA
Brian
On 06/08/2012 10:14 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:
So, how does this scenario work?
* The machine has 4G of RAM,
* > 50% RAM is being used by actual software (firefox, eclipse, mail
client, etc), so the other < 50% is pagecache
* The machine has 4G of swap, none of which is active.
So then a user drops a 8.5G DVD image into /tmp.
On a traditi
On 06/20/2012 01:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
What happens when I have 2 users who are both downloading dvd iso
sized images into /tmp as well as other things going on. Remind me...
where does firefox by default cache in progress downloads for the
"Open in" facility. Isn't it down in tmp?
On 06/20/2012 01:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler said:
So, how does this scenario work?
* The machine has 4G of RAM,
* > 50% RAM is being used by actual software (firefox, eclipse, mail
client, etc), so the other < 50% is pagecache
* The machine has 4G of swap
ion it was leaving this as a
default. I don't know if this is a good thing or not.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
I don't think its just a matter of quantity of I/O but _when_ the I/O
happens. Instead of the pagecache getting flushed to disk when it is
conve
On 07/13/2012 10:14 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 07/13/2012 09:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 07/12/2012 09:54 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
As I have
Out of curiosity, is the cirrus driver used in qemu/kvm or does it use
something else?
On 08/27/2013 10:46 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers:
xorg-x11-drv-apm
xorg-x11-drv-cirrus
xorg-x11-drv-geode
xorg-x11-drv-glint
xorg-x11-drv-i128
xorg-x11-drv
Repeating that "fast boot times matter" is just as bogus as saying they
don't. The 2 or 3 seconds that's being talked about here has no
meaningful impact on anything other than embedded users and they're
probably not using grub anyway.
Fedora 18 screwed my laptop pretty thoroughly since the A
On 03/12/2013 02:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 6:02 AM, Jiří Eischmann wrote:
New kernels bring a lot of
regressions and we don't have enough test coverage to avoid them. The
gen
Fedora isn't windows. Its not OSX. It should never be those things and
I'm grateful for it.
The boot menu doesn't hurt anything. It has benefits.
What are the benefits of removing the boot menu?
* Saving upwards of 5 seconds per day! My god, think of the
productivity boost!
* Its prettier
On 03/12/2013 02:35 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:31:36PM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
Fedora isn't windows. Its not OSX. It should never be those things
and I'm grateful for it.
We shouldn't ignore developments done in other camps. NIH is bad.
On 12/09/2014 08:50 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 9 December 2014 at 13:39, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
So your challenge is to find an alternative default that
supports it.
I'd go even further. I don't think the people writing the vast number
of le
On 12/09/2014 10:11 AM, Bastien Nocera
wrote:
The defaults for the various products are "packaged" by zones. You just need
to change the firewalld zone to get whatever is the default on the server side.
Ok, so it's another item on my list of "th
On 12/09/2014 11:46 AM, Richard Hughes
wrote:
I don't think it makes much sense for people to stamp their feet
saying "BUT I LIKED THE OLD WAY OF DOING THINGS" when the people
leading the workstation product have identified that the old way of
doing things just
On 12/09/2014 01:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Richard Hughes wrote:
So do I! I'm a developer, which spin do I use so that the firewall
doesn't get in my way? We can't develop a *product* based around what
you s
35 matches
Mail list logo
