Hi Anthony
Glad to know you are still around. I am sure things will improve with
time. If you get a chance could you please move me to the admin group
in the kubernetes repo? I have a couple of clean up items to take care
of that need admin access.
Best regards
Brad
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:17
Thanks Anthony. Nothing else at this time. Contribute at any time.
Brad
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 17:39 Anthony Rabbito
wrote:
> Thanks Brad! I have done so. If there's any other similar issues feel free
> to reach out.
>
> Anthony
> ___
> devel mailing
Is this thread on alternatives to alternatives also relevant:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4AUQVBKLQBU6LIWZGVXN2CM3XTYQAKXZ/#4AUQVBKLQBU6LIWZGVXN2CM3XTYQAKXZ
?
Modules provide a mechanism for system level switches between
alternative versions a
The upstream Kubernetes project released patch updates to all
supported versions of Kubernetes (1.23, 1.24, 1.25, 1.26). With these
updates all supported versions are now built with go 1.19.
Fedora 36 provides go 1.18 and also provides Kubernetes 1.24. As of
Kubernetes 1.24.10, updates for Kubern
reach out.
Best Regards
Brad Smith
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:19 PM Dalton Hubble wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space. I've been
> a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8 years, and used to
> w
As shared bt @music on the Fedora build system matrix channel, this
happens after a new Fedora release is branched. You can install these
two packages to update your system to work correctly.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4a6de3d12d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE
You should install the mock-core-config and distribution-gpg-keys rpms
for the version of Fedora that is running fedpkg. If I am reading your
first post correctly, you are using an F41 vm to run "fedpkg --release
f41 mockbuild".
distribution-gpg-keys-1.105-1.fc41 should already be in stable
accord
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
>
> I don't have an ETA on the K8S situation.
>
Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the
kubernetes rpms to help.
Best regards
Brad
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 12:40 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the
> > kubernetes rpms to help.
>
> The kubernetes rpms are completely separate from the unbundled
> golang-k8s-* packages and use bundled dependencies as far as I know.
>
Thanks
I had the same question. Then I noticed this pinned post in Fedora Discussions:
"We are experimenting 2 with using Fedora Discussion as part of the
Changes process. Change announcements (like the one you are reading
right now) will still be sent to the devel-announce mailing list, but
the conversa
At a minimum, I recommend that the patch include the original values
for GOPROXY, GOSUMDB, and GOTOOLCHAIN as comments. This makes it
easier to change back to default values. At the moment, one has to
visit the relevant web pages.
I lean towards providing upstream defaults in this case with update
Greetings -
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:35 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Can someone clarify what they mean by this? The patch itself [1] makes
> it pretty clear what the original values are.
When I look at /usr/lib/golang/go.env I see:
[bgsmith@pico newversionprep (main *%)]$ more /usr/lib/golan
Early next week I will push Kubernetes v1.29 rpms to rawhide. There
are 2 important changes to be aware of.
First, this will replace Kubernetes v1.28 in rawhide and therefore in
Fedora 40. Future updates for Kubernetes 1.28 will be found in COPR at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/buckaroog
I had this problem too. There is a new version of mock and more-core-config
(not sure of name still getting first cup of coffee) in updates-testing
that has the fix.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, 04:32 Richard Shaw wrote:
> For about a week I've been seeing this when trying to test build packages
> for
I have not used nodejs for development in quite a while so cannot
respond from an involved user perspective. Given that context, I
concur with Dan's reasoning and choices.
On a more meta note, Fedora has at least 3 mechanisms to provide
multiple versions of some component for a given release -
alt
page can be supplemented
by email to this list and posts on the Fedora community blog and
Discussions.
I will be glad to update the proposal to make this more explicit.
best regards
Brad Smith
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Something that is not dis
I help maintain a package where upstream changed the process to
generate installed documentation. In version 1.30 and newer, the spec
file needs to use process A; in versions older than 1.30 (e.g. 1.29.x,
etc) the spec file needs to use process B. I am struggling to find a
workable solution to test
Thanks Tom. A good question. Basically upstream supports 3 or 4
versions concurrently so I need to maintain a spec file that works
across this version boundary since the older versions will be
available in Fedora for another year. Also there are forthcoming
changes that make it desirable to have si
Thanks Adam.
Yes there is a new shell script that does the new document generation.
I experimented with using the %{exists: ...} macro but could not get
it to work. If you have an example at hand I would greatly appreciate
it.
Best regards
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:46 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
Greetings -
I am sure this question has been asked and answered many times but I
could not find anything that specifically addressed my questions via
google search.
I have modified a spec file for a python based application (weewx
specifically although that is not too relevant) to target Fedora
Greetings
Peter Hunt (aka haircommander) asked if I might be interested in
assisting with the maintenance of the kubernetes packages for Fedora.
I have the time and interest and some of the needed skills. I am
certainly willing to learn.
I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US
Thank you Matthew.
Brad
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:42:10AM -0800, Brad Smith wrote:
> > I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US Forest
> > Service). I have a background in software develop
if kubeadm is used to
initialize a cluster.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:24 AM Code Zombie wrote:
>
> Which binaries first this package include?
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024, 21:58 Brad Smith wrote:
>>
>> The rpm for Kubernetes v1.32 (kubernetes1.32) has been pushed into
>> r
The rpm for Kubernetes v1.32 (kubernetes1.32) has been pushed into
rawhide with the beta.0 release. This rpm will also be available in
F41. Rawhide and F41 also have kubernetes1.31, kubernetes1.30, and
kubernetes1.29 rpms.
If you test kubernetes1.32 and are upgrading from v1.31 please see
this urg
Kubernetes v1.29 is EOL along with CRI-O v1.29 and CRI-Tools v1.29.
Updates to the kubernetes1.29, cri-o1.29, cri-tools1.29 versioned
packages will no longer happen in Fedora (currently in F41, F42, F43).
I will mark these rpms as retired for F43 (rawhide) and possibly for
F42.
Fedora 40 and 41 a
25 matches
Mail list logo
