Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-27 Thread Bowen Wang
I saw the 20160927 images in the wesite, but I when I ran the dnf upgrade --refresh, it says nothing to do, is that normal? Thanks. Bowen On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 05:14:31PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:06 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Missing expected images:

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-27 Thread Bowen Wang
39 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > > I saw the 20160927 images in the wesite, but I when I ran the dnf > > upgrade --refresh, it says nothing to do, is that normal? Thanks. > > It's not unusual...there's some other stuff that happens between the > compose 'completi

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
use I think I slept for 7 hours, and it will be enough for the mirror sync the latest packages, maybe there is still something wrong with my rawhide configuration? Bowen On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:38:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 23:22 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > &

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
e first time, the mirror I am using just got the latest update. So I can upgrade my system when running the second time. Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:50:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 10:43 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > > I just got up and run > > dnf upg

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
hide/Everything/x86_64/os/ BTW, I live in Missouri, USA. Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:12 PM, stan wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800 > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang > > wrote: > > > This is the content of the

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
Hi Stan, I am not sure if I know what you are saying, can you explain it again? Thanks. Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:12 PM, stan wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800 > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang > > wrote: > &g

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
These are all the files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ fedora-cisco-openh264.repo fedora-rawhide.repo fedora.repo fedora-updates.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo Is this correct? Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:36:53PM -0700, stan wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:43:21 -0500 > Bowen Wang

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

2016-09-28 Thread Bowen Wang
Thanks for being so patient and explaining so much stuff to me! Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:10:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 00:56 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > > These are all the files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ > > > > fedora-cisco-ope

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

2016-10-12 Thread Bowen Wang
So it means that there will be no longer Rawhide version of Fedora, or it is just a change of repo/target name. Bowen On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:11:42PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:14:34 +0200 > Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > FYI: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: rawhide users: Do this now if you want to stick with F26 and not F27

2017-03-03 Thread Bowen Wang
What should I do if I want to use F27 except importing the GPG keys for F27? I am currently using rawhide. Bowen On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 03:59:55PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > Now that F26 is branched off from rawhide, I know many developers > (including me) want to stay with F26 instead of F27