On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking
> them to
> either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email
> address in FAS
> matches an existing bugzilla account.
>
> Havi
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email
> > > aski
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 15:41 +0530, Anoop C S via devel wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > &
Hi,
Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS
package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have
glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs.
There is no active development effort in upstream[2] for glusterfs-
coreutils.
Therefore I i
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 16:44 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS
> package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have
> glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs.
> There is no active developmen
Retirement in effect with
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glusterfs-coreutils/c/9b9b5240c2305cfa6dbeb9be7dbccc4b389939a7?branch=rawhide
Anoop C S.
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 10:27 +0530, Anoop C S via devel wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 16:44 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
