Hi,
From the systemd.mount(5) man page:
"Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab"
This makes me wonder - to what extent will systemd replace fstab in
future Fedoras? Will fstab disappear in favour of systemd mount units?
Andy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
Hi,
On 18/01/12 22:42, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
On 24/01/12 12:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of systems.
I
On 10/04/14 17:05, Bill Nottingham wrote:
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Not that I assume splitting lanauges and docs. into sub packages would
triple primary numbers, but if it did ... that would be bad.
To put it in perspective, if we split out 'langpacks' for apps per langua
On 11/04/14 21:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:13:42PM +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
On 10/04/14 17:05, Bill Nottingham wrote:
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Not that I assume splitting lanauges and docs. into sub packages would
triple primary numbers
On 25/04/14 20:10, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 14:03 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 18:10 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Petr Spacek wrote:
I'm going to reproduce and debug issue in named. Do you see any specific
reason why I should use -O2 for serious debugging/devel
On 24/04/14 15:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We probably should make setjmp()-freeness a requirement for
all code included in Fedora.
Would it be worth the effort, and how feasible is it anyway?
- Do we have any usage statistics?
- How often do we see bugs caused by bad uses of setjmp/longjmp?
On 16/05/14 11:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
I'm not sure if they work but I think a wi
Hi Troy,
On 27/06/14 16:26, Troy Dawson wrote:
It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation.
Did you look for deltarpm in the yum.conf man page? If it's missing then
that might be the problem (it's there on my x86_64 F20 machines at least).
Cheers,
Andy
--
devel maili
On 27/06/14 23:58, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Hello, I have updated two laptops runing F20 today. After the update, on
both of them (Asus and Dell) the trackpad has turned very slow, and
unaffected of any change in the gnome control panel.
Try this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
On 24/08/12 13:41, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 10:08 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
/var/run/$name.pid is the standard pid file location for daemons and has been so
for ages. A lot of distros depend on this, and we used to depend on it until we
moved to systemd which no longer cares
On 03/09/12 23:31, Neal Becker wrote:
Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
fedpkg pull
Already up-to-date.
git branch
f12
f13
f14
f15
f16
* f17
master
"git pull -a" will grab the f18 branch. Not sure why fedpkg doesn't do it.
- Ken
$ gi
Ah the ol' Fedora stability improvement thread. It must be Friday. Ok,
I'll bite.
This sort of conversation often comes and goes without much being done.
Usually it consists of debates between three camps:
1. Those who see Fedora as an intrinsically unstable distro which
showcases and attrac
On 07/12/12 17:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:11:31PM +, Andrew Price wrote:
Ah the ol' Fedora stability improvement thread. It must be Friday.
Ok, I'll bite.
This sort of conversation often comes and goes without much being
done. Usually it consists
On 14/11/13 15:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 13:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really interested what is the state of gma500_gfx driver in latest
kernel, is it reasonable to expect that this driver will get updated
and have better support or should I just say to
Hi,
I've just enabled gating tests for gfs2-utils and after the new build
finished I got a notification email from bodhi that said:
"This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'."
On the bodhi update page[0] the "fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional"
test was highlighted re
16 matches
Mail list logo
