Fedora 14 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Alpha RC2 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Alpha RC4 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Matej Cepl redhat.com> writes:
>
> Adam Williamson, Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:11:57 -0700:
> > http://www.happyassassin.net/2010/06/26/a-quick-reminder-on-64-bit-
> flash/
> >
> > should sort you out.
>
> well, I think that the advice on this page is somehow confused:
>
> a) flash-plugin (at least
Michał Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks! It almost woks now (nspluginwrapper.i686 was missing I had
> only x86_64 version) - video works well, but I don't hear any audio. I
> can play music through Amarok and I can control sound volume. I can't
> do this for Firefox - it seems to be muted.
Michał Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
>
> 2010/9/5 Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org>:
> > Michał Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Thanks! It almost woks now (nspluginwrapper.i686 was missing I had
> >> only x86_64 version) - video works well
Michał Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> package krb5-libs-1.7.1-13.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than
> krb5-libs-1.7.1-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
krb5-libs-1.7.1-13.fc13 is from updates-testing. On my F13 box without
updates-testing, I have
krb5-libs-1.7.1-10.fc13.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.7.1-1
When installing packages with yum, if there is more than one enabled repository
that can be used to resolve a dependency, how does yum choose which one to use?
I ask because I modified the instructions for installing the 32-bit wrapped
Flash plugin in 64-bit Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
seth vidal fedoraproject.org> writes:
> http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/CompareProviders
>
> that's how it does it.
Thanks. I didn't understand all of that, but since it only describes the current
algorithm in detail, and the instructions refer to all versions of Fedora back
to F10, and I still don
Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Beta RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Beta RC2 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 14 Beta RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> It's really pretty simple: we can only define goals and values and
> blahblah for 'the Fedora project' as long as we actually retain control
> over 'the Fedora project' (that's we as in the Fedora community, not Red
> Hat, BTW) and we can only do that if we c
John Poelstra redhat.com> writes:
> Mon 11-Oct Mon 11-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final TC Compose
Does this mean that the (real) TC1 ISOs will show up tonight (instead of October
12)?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Fedora 14 Final TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
On 10/14/2010 06:25 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> When: Friday, 2010-10-08 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT/9 AM PDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
You mean 2010-10-15? I have the identical message to test-announce
waiting for moderation - could you resubmit it with the correct date?
Thanks.
Fedora 14 Final RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629
Is there any one interested in taking over this package? If not, what is the
procedure for dealing with it
Christoph Wickert googlemail.com> writes:
> Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 08:29 + schrieb Andre Robatino:
> > Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629
>
> Did you try to contact An
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When they
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
**IMPORTANT** : The next Fedora 16 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting is in less
than 24 hours - Wednesday, August 17, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00
PDT) so the Alpha test cases (see below) would need to be done by then.
Thanks.
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 5
(RC5) i
Would it be possible to create a custom image that just does a minimal (possibly
text-based) install? This might reduce memory requirements even more, and extra
packages could be added later - the DVD could be used as a repo if bandwidth is
an issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
Johannes Lips googlemail.com> writes:
> what about using the Text Mode for the install? [1]
> According to the release notes it only needs 256MB of RAM so I think it
> should be feasible, or? [2]
> Are there anything preventing the usage of the textmode?
Unfortunately, those numbers are way out
Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com> writes:
> 768 MB!!!
>
> When I want to stuff as many VMs onto a virtual machine as possible,
> RAM usage really matters. Particularly since RAM is currently cheap
> up to about 8 GB but becomes much more expensive above that (ie. up to
> about 6 VMs with all the o
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When they a
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
> * As a maintainer you should only be pushing an update you feel
> works/fixes something anyhow. Shouldn't that be an implied +1 always
> from the maintainer?
Well, there's actual testing, vs. being convinced based on the apparent
simplicity of a patch that it
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Test Compose 2
(TC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When they a
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When t
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In
general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install
images: see the links be
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In
general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install
images: see the links be
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
The priority in RC4 testing is to complete the installation tests. We
must complete these by
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl), so if
This is a followup to the earlier TC1 announcement
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2011-October/000309.html
when the x86_64 install images were not available yet. They are now in
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16.TC1/Fedora/x86_64/iso/
Delta ISOs should be avai
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl), so if
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl),
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl),
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl),
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl),
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 5
(RC5) is now available for testing. Changes are listed in the rel-eng
ticket below. Please see the following pages for download links
(including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Serverbeach1 is still
available as a mirror (
Fedora 15 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Result
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC2 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Result
Currently the download directories for install and live images are called
"Fedora" and "Live", resp. Shouldn't the former be "Install" instead? After all,
everything in both directories is Fedora's, so calling one of them "Fedora"
doesn't appear helpful.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 22:47 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
> > What about to counteract "misplaced" karma? Example:
> >
> > - Bug exists in version X.Y
> > - Update filed for X.Y+1
> > - User reports that bug still exists with -1 karma
> > - Maintai
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> But if the user just wants to revoke their karma by changing their +/-1 to a 0
> (say they realize they're not able to test properly, which happened to me),
> that's still not possible (see https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/t
Michael Schwendt gmail.com> writes:
> Anonymous users' votes don't add to the karma level.
> Their votes are just informative.
Not being in a non-CLA group != anonymous. Anyone can create a bodhi account and
log in, but unless they're in a non-CLA group, their fp.o email doesn't work and
they ge
Filed https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4654 .
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
(Sorry to respond to this out-of-thread, but gmane doesn't seem to have
this thread indexed except for my original post.)
Jesse Keating wrote:
> This is fair criticism. I believe I'm the one that started referring
> to these composes as "release candidates" more vocally. We needed a >
way to re
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Haley redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to run F15 beta LiveCD in a virtual machine, but I get
> > a complaint that GNOME 3 failed to load and is running in fallback
> > mode. Is there any way to make it work properly when vi
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.or
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproje
On 05/11/2011 03:41 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> x86_64 dvd iso is missing.
Sorry about that. The images were on alt.fp.o, but I didn't wait until
the x86_64 images were finished rsync'ing to serverbeach1 (the server
used in the download links) before posting the announcement. All images
are on s
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproje
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes:
> > how efficient would software rendering be, compared to that?
>
> Probably less. Depends entirely on what your host drivers implement,
> and how well, and on what the guest drivers demand, and how well they're
> implemented, and so forth. But assuming all
Lucas gmail.com> writes:
> I use systemd-28-3.fc16.i686 and updated it when it became available,
> but still have real problems
> with boot.
> If it stops it happens definitely in systemd job - when it is starting
> services. And I can't find any errors.
> More important that I have changed seli
Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> IMHO, one should always be able to run "yum -y update" without fear
> of such damage. Maybe that's naive, but with the exception of
> yesterday's run, it's worked for me for more than two years of
> rawhide and F10..F13.
In x86_64 F13 and Rawhide, often depe
Fedora 13 Final TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
On 04/30/2010 04:46 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Hi,
> It would be nice if Jigdo downloads could be also provided so that
> people with previous releases (e.g. Beta release) which have downloaded
> (and cached) updates could easily create new installation media without
> downloading much (which w
On 04/30/2010 06:25 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Well, I'm not going to insist on providing jigdo. However, the situation
> in my mind is this one: I've downloaded Fedora 13 Beta DVD iso
> previously and installed it on my system. Then, I've updated my system
> regularly (using yum presto) and I
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY redhat.com> writes:
> IIRC in f16alpha and f16beta with openssh-server installed, sshd was
> enabled and run.
>
> I installed f16ga in several vm guests yesterday and even though
> openssh-server was installed, it was both not enabled and therefor not
> run when the install
Adam Tkac redhat.com> writes:
> today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources`
> command but it failed with
> "pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given
> CA certificates')" error.
I saw the same error trying to use fedora-easy-karma in F16.
http
Michael Schwendt gmail.com> writes:
> Is this including updates from
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15056
python-gitdb-0.5.4-1.fc16.x86_64
python-smmap-0.8.1-3.fc16.noarch
GitPython-0.2.0-0.6.beta1.fc16.noarch
fedpkg-0.5.9.2-2.fc16.noarch
package rpkg is not installed
f
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> For developers like me which have a F16 repo for mock builds anyway it
> is quite useful though. A large fraction of the stuff in Packages/ is
> on my disk already, and with a jigdo I could save quite a bit on
> bandwidth and download time over my not-exactly-fast internet
On 11/16/2011 04:23 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/15/11 18:23, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>> For developers like me which have a F16 repo for mock builds anyway it
>>> is quite useful though. A large fraction of the stuff in Packages/ is
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. (Lives are not currently available.)
Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5054 . Please see the following
pages for download links (includ
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> Shutting down can occasionally get a bit wiggy after a systemd version
> update. Was this right after you did a big F16 -> F17 yum update or
> anything? If so, you may find you have to just suck it up and hard power
> off one time, then it'll be back to worki
**IMPORTANT**: There were different versions of the TC2 install and live
images which were overwritten prior to this announcement. I also briefly
posted delta ISOs for some of these old images. Please make sure that
the images you are using correspond to the currently posted checksum files.
As per
**IMPORTANT**: 17 Alpha RC1 was never officially announced - see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2012-February/000371.html
. I will post delta ISOs for both RC1->RC2 and TC2->RC2.
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available
Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com> writes:
> In F17 and Rawhide, I'm getting this error in root.log:
>
> DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: ceph-0.37-2.fc17.x86_64 (build)
> DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libtcmalloc.so.0()(64bit)
This causes 17 Alpha RC2 to fail repoclosure, so it won't
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
> For the record, we intentionally don't include a direct download link in
> the announcement, because we want to strongly encourage people to read
> the actual testing instructions before downloading.
Actually, I don't use direct download links because it scales better.
There are several test pag
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
In
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/602
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-06-08/fesco.2011-06-08-17.30.log.html
it was decided to name the Live images using i386 instead of i686, to make them
consistent. This appears to have slipped through the cracks.
--
devel mailing
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5116 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing instructio
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5116 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing instructio
I came across the following old post, which I'm not responding to in-thread due
to its age.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-September/msg00517.html
The question was raised why RPMs sign their compressed data, rather than
uncompressed. (One advantage would be to avoid deltar
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Uncompressing hostile data is generally not a good thing to be doing.
> From that aspect it makes more sense to sign the compressed payload.
I was thinking that since the signature check usually passes, the data
could be uncompressed into a cache, checked there, then copi
James Antill wrote:
> IMO, as has been said before, if you have a delta method that doesn't
> produce the exact same bits at the end ... you've probably failed. It
> might seem like a good idea, but even if you go to the extreme lengths
> needed to make it just for yum ... things like reposync won
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> Lack of manpower ideas:
>
> * Allow anonymous karma to count. Anonymous karma would allow more people
> who report bugs in bugzilla to add karma in bodhi without having to get
> a second account in the Fedora Account System. For critpath packages,
> w
The recent change in xz compression settings caused md5 mismatch errors in
rebuilding RPMs (since applydeltarpm doesn't know the difference between the old
and new compression). This resulted in significant work for releng. To avoid
this issue in the future, what about using different names and pac
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> This could require different naames for the library too which will get a bit
> harder than just the binary name.
Sorry for the late reply. I just noticed the presence in Rawhide of the
xz-compat-libs package which provides the old compression with liblzma.so.
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> I don't believe so. I think we'd need to 1) rebuild all packages using the
> new compression 2) Teach the deltaiso stuff that generating an F15 iso needs
> to use the new version of the xz/delta*.
2) is easy enough. To get F14 to use the new compression unco
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> 2) is easy enough. To get F14 to use the new compression unconditionally, I
> downloaded the Rawhide version of several packages and then used yum shell
> with
> the commands
>
> config gpgcheck 0
> install xz-compat-libs
Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes:
> Commandline xz would compress differently and other random apps that we
> don't know of would as well. This may not cause any difficulties... OTOH,
> it could be that people *are* depending on the compression being the same.
> breaking that assumption is some
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications
> should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the
> desktop providing a central config point.
Is there a replacement for "Automatically remember running applications
Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 15 Alpha TC2 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 15 Alpha RC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Fedora 15 Alpha RC2 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
Stephen John Smoogen gmail.com> writes:
>From my research to use the SHA-2 in TLS requires the user and server
> to be both able to talk TLS-1.2. From what I found at wikipedia
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security) Firefox does
> not support 1.2 (only Opera and IE8 do).
It's
Original Message
Subject: Fedora 13 Final RC3 Available Now!
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:57:24 -0400
From: Andre Robatino
To: test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 13 Final RC3 is now available [1], with changes from RC2 in
NetworkManager, anaconda, pino, and shotwell [2
Fedora 13 Final RC3 is now available [1], with changes from RC2 in
NetworkManager, anaconda, pino, and shotwell [2]. Please refer to the
following pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
htt
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
