On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:21:25PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that Fedora 18 will ship with
> this change, and applications need to be updated to handle the change,
> or we will have a more broken Fedora 18. Advising people not to patch
> programs won't ma
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > my biggest problem was that tmpfs by
> > default allocates half of physical RAM for partition. So I just
> > allocated big enough swap and added a line to /etc/fstab with
> > appropriate size= option.
> And how is a random user sup
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:27:01AM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Wait a minute. Back in this thread it says that half of RAM is
> allocated to the tmpfs for /tmp.
No-no-no! Default tmpfs size is half of physical RAM, that's
all. That doesn't mean that is stays in RAM forever.
$ df -h /tmp
Filesyst
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:21AM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> Well, since I'm probably going to turn it off, can someone give me a
> good reason why it should be turned _on_ by default? For me, the
> "Benefit to Fedora" bullets are not compelling.
One good reason is to separate /tmp from /.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:50:55PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Not a single person who has claimed a performance or semantic win for
> this /tmp move has replied when asked for proof.
$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/file bs=1M count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
107374
Hi,
I am the new Fedora Package Collection Maintainer. I'm from
Russia, my name is Alexey, but people call me "raorn" (begins
with small letter "r").
I was Packager in ALT Linux distro for about eight years, my
interests are IPv6, OpenFlow, Vim, zsh, mutt, ruby and
WindowMaker. I'm familiar wit
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:20:02PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It, in fact, provides proof that this feature is searching for a
> problem. Which applications require gigabytes per second throughput out
> of /tmp?
sort(1) and maybe mock(1) ;-)
> (and your numbers for tmpfs would equal ext4
Hi,
Just sharing my fedpkg(1) completion for zsh :-) Put this file
somewhere in your $fpath as usual.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
#compdef fedpkg
(( $+functions[_fedpkg_targets] )) ||
_fedpkg_targets()
{
local expl
_wanted koji-targets expl 'tar
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:11:36PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> > Just sharing my fedpkg(1) completion for zsh :-) Put this file
> > somewhere in your $fpath as usual.
> You might want to add it here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/81
I've added it here:
https://bugzilla.redha
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:36:15AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 10:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> > +1
>
> This really isn't adding anything to the discussion, just noise. Please
> stop replying to large emails, quoting the entire thing, and just adding
> a "+1". It's not helpful.
Hi,
As new upstream maintainer of WINGs Display Manager, I would like
to resurrect wdm package in Fedora (/etc/X11/prefdm still have
wdm support and that's great). Major changes are systemd support
and XDG parser for /usr/share/xsessions/.
Is there a policy on packaging display managers? Someth
Hi,
I am running F17 in IPv6-only network (behind NAT64 gateway) and
would like to get rid of 127.0.0.1 address from lo interface.
Please, don't tell me, that this "would break lots of stone-aged
software", because such configuration works for about a year
already in non-RH distro.
I can't find
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 02:44:42PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > I can't find who sets "inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host" address to lo
> > interface. Commented out the IPADDRESS in ifcfg-lo - no result.
> systemd sets this very early during boot.
Is is configurable?
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Disabling IPv4 should result in socket(AF_INET, ...) returning
> EAFNOSUPPORT. Just taking away 127.0.0.1 doesn't do anything like that.
Yep, and it doesn't prevent for anyone listening on 0.0.0.0...
But still, is it possible to
Hi,
I have my "development server" running in IPv6-only LAN behind
dual-stack gateway with NAT64/DNS64 (tayga/bind9.8 on OpenWRT).
$ fedpkg -v build
Creating repo object from /home/raorn/src/wmmon
Running: rpm -q --qf %{NAME} --specfile wmmon.spec
Could not read /home/raorn/.koji/config for c
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:01:26PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> I have my "development server" running in IPv6-only LAN behind
> dual-stack gateway with NAT64/DNS64 (tayga/bind9.8 on OpenWRT).
With happens on F17 with updates and updates-testing.
--
Regards,--
Sir R
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:01:26PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> $ fedpkg -v build
> Creating repo object from /home/raorn/src/wmmon
> Running: rpm -q --qf %{NAME} --specfile wmmon.spec
> Could not read /home/raorn/.koji/config for config values
> Initiating a koji
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:49:56PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-page
> It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and
> or have the option not to install them.
Since man pages are marked as %doc, you can use %_
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:00:24PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Does not solve the problem of dependency like for example if we want
> to get rid of man-db and it's dependency's so forth and so on.
Well, it does solve the wasted disk space problem.
> The only way we can move forward is
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
> 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff
pgp3P6
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
devel
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> > Just as a side note, even if this was applied to our koji, there is
> > currently no ipv6 connectivity at the datacenter it's at, so you would
> > still be unable to connect to it with ipv6. ;(
> You can be in IPv6 only network and
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Then engineer asks to run "tail /var/log/messages".
> Customer says: "I see
>cannot open ‘/var/log/messages’: No such file or directory
> message".
And this happens every time in, say, Debian. Great, isn't it?
> Engineer asks t
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> Then engineer asks to run "tail /var/log/messages".
> >> Customer says: "I see
> >>cannot open ‘/var/log/messages’: No such file or directory
> >> message".
> > And this happens every time in, say, Debian. Great, isn't it?
>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:56:56PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> > How would /var/log/messages file help in case of a corrupted
> > filesystem/disk?
> You stand a considerably better chance of reading a text file than a
> database when it has partial corruption.
Please, show exact numbers and your cal
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Let's not forget: this is not about removing software from the
> distro. This is just about removing it from the default install, since
> the current way it is set up by default it just eats up messages
> silently, with not indic
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 06:50:17PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Actually, with the various Fedora MUAs I've used, it ended up being easier
> to configure them to use local MTA as relay
If you are able to configure the MTA of your choice, then you
will be able to install that MTA when you need it
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:35:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> raorn:BADSOURCE:wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz:wmMatrix
> raorn:BADSOURCE:wmmon-1.0b2-g575778a6.tar.gz:wmmon
> raorn:BADSOURCE:wmpager-1.2-g88ece7e5.tar.gz:wmpager
Source tag is a link to repo.or.cz. Timestamps are changed each
time arc
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:59:36PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> $ HEAD -S http://github.com/raorn/wmvolman/archive/2.0.1/wmvolman-2.0.1.tar.gz
> Content-Type: application/x-gzip
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=wmvolman-2.0.1.tar.gz
--2013-10-03 05:54:40--
http://g
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:21:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > What tool were you using for download?
> spectool -g *.spec
Which uses curl do download files...
"remote-header-name" should be added to /etc/rpmdevtools/curlrc
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com
Hi!
I've packaged two more WindowMaker applets, looking for review
swaps...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947036
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947048
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:46:51AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
> wmsystemtray
I'd like to become new maintainer of wmsystemtray.
--
Regards,
Hi.
I was too slow and missed the orphaning of wmsystemtray package.
I am using it a lot and would like to become a new maintainer.
Since package was Deprecated in f19 and rawhide, I've opened
review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947086
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. ---
Hi,
When I tried to run fedpkg upload I got error:
Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (60, "Peer's
certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the user.")
This is how I solved it:
certutil -d sql:$HOME/.pki/nssdb -A -i \
$HOME/.fedora-server-ca.cert -n 'Fedora Project
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify
> HTTP_PROXY or ALL_PROXY env vars.
Shouldn't it be "http_proxy" and "all_proxy", in lower case?
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.co
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:25:48PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> memused="`ps auxwww|grep clock-ap[p]let | awk '{ print $6 }'`"
memused="$(ps -ho rss `pidof clock-applet`)"
This is simplier and more clear.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Des
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Marcel Wysocki wrote:
> In the pkgdb i could already take ownership of f17 and epel6 branch but
> not master.
> id like to update and maintain the package.
Did this some time ago:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
Y
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 12:25:19AM -0500, Alex G. wrote:
> aptitude has something called "deferred ldconfig processing", and
> annoyingly, aptitude updates faster than yum. I've always wondered how
> yum/rpm can be smartized to speed things up this way. But this
> discussion is for a brighter day.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> I think about removal of git-bzr package in rawhide, which is actualy
> non-functional - contains only file with warning message
> about replacement by git-remote-bzr package - which actualy replace git-bzr
> in f21 too. Are you OK wi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:14:22PM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> I am looking to have the following package reviewed for inclusion into
> fedora.
I'll review it.
BUGNO or didn't happen? ;-)
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:14:22PM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> I have attached the SRPM of what I have created.
I just figured, that you are asking questions before actually
creating review request...
> Should the ifup/ifdown script generate the tayga.conf on the fly to
> say /var/run/tmp somewh
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:46:56AM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> > I just figured, that you are asking questions before actually
> > creating review request...
> There is a different way to make an "official" request? (It's a learning
> process ...)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Pro
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:54:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> - This run was done on a Fedora 20 instance, so hopefully many of the
> false positives due to old tools from the last run are gone.
Those are still false positives:
> raorn:BADSOURCE:wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz:wmMatrix
> raorn:B
43 matches
Mail list logo
