-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2010 06:15 AM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> No escape clause needed for applications.
> The 2nd sentence of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Lisp
> "This document does not describe conventions and customs for application
> programs that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2010 04:32 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> It sounds like we should tell the Fedora Project Board that we are
> forming, and appoint someone to send them regular status reports. We
> should also tell the Packaging Committee that we have identified s
't get any response.
why don't you use `koji build --scratch` builds until the situation gets
fixed since it essentially gives you (remote) mock building?
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2010 11:51 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
> Am 30.01.2010 11:23, schrieb Alexander Kahl:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
>>> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
ge first, coupling this with the minimum Karma automatism - where
low-profile packages are excluded from this by not reaching a minimum
threshold? This approach would be sophisticated, sensible and IMO easily
accepted by the majority of users and maintainers.
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software De
- -1, I would have to orphan most of my packages and give up my current
plans of founding a Common Lisp SIG as it will die suffering the
chicken-and-egg problem if this gets approval.
I'd rather fork Fedora than accept this without massive modification
(see my first post in this thread).
- --
lobal state paradigm and thus
RPM and yum altogether and adopt a system like Nix (http://nixos.org/).
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail
mic upgrades and rollbacks"
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuYmY0ACgkQVTRddCFHw12vggCg1mfBxF5LB9Dg7zB6zl6XJlXZ
GqMAn3DyYhZ4TIzsnUcmTPOION
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2010 09:24 AM, yersinia wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Alexander Kahl wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/10/2010 01:06 PM, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2010 02:16 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Alexander Kahl wrote:
>
>> On 03/10/2010 08:26 PM, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
>>> If there's a magic solution that will satisfy the vast majority
>>> of Fedora users, I ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2010 03:05 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:53 +0100, Alexander Kahl wrote:
>> Oh, and by the way, we could leave behind all those discussions
>> regarding dynamic linking: RPATH for everything and ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2010 11:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Alexander Kahl wrote:
>> Please define "massive" if you're keeping exactly what's needed to keep
>> everything running and prune anything else by using a sophistic
(It's in rpmfusion for a reason)
> Is it being obsoleted by a fedora package (license been cleared or
> something)?
>
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using G
this has changed in the meantime.
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkufl6sACgkQVTRddCFHw12H2QCglNDY3SzP3NfVuKsbH8V7qtUa
KgEAnRbZR0awwBYFeYq
k for PHP5 - generator
component
php-pear-propel_runtime -- An ORM framework for PHP5 - runtime component
Thank you
Alex
- --
Alexander Kahl
GNU/Linux Software Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
15 matches
Mail list logo
