t to group
> project, then please let me know and we change it
> manually.
> --
> Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
> Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
votes | name
> > - +--
> > 1427 | Kevin Fenzi
> > 1247 | Adam Jackson
> > 919 | Tomas Hozza
> > 818 | Parag Nemade
> > 617 | Debarshi Ray ← GNOME developer
> > - +--
>
> configuration file?
It should be done by MongoDB, I would get in touch with the upstream and
discuss the problem with them.
> Marek
>
--
Greetings,
Alberto Ruiz
Engineering Manager - Desktop Applications Team
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ly news is that Cisco will hand out blobs
> with gratis patent licenses for some time. Establishing a standard
> based on the assumption that Cisco will continue doing that
> indefinitely seems like a bad idea.
Is better than nothing, we can always fall back to what we do now once
they s
ora is pretty bad". So while trying to preserve
freedom, you are in fact, harming the perception of the quality of our
software and the ability of people to get their stuff done.
So my suggestion is that we wait for Mozilla to come up with an actual
mechanism to install this, we review it, and we m
ust to get the latest LibreOffice version to name an example.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
--
Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:28 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 15:46:07 +0100,
>Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> >
> >While I agree that we shouldn't silently install non-free software (and
> >I'm sure Mozilla doesn't want to either), saying t
er desktop apps.
(This, I think, is why this idea gets so much pushback from the distro
communities)
And, by the way, we've been supporting this kind of model with pip and
gem already, so I really don't get why all the fuss when suddenly we
want to do it with the desktop applications.
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 18:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > We still have a problem with MP3, but it does solve a fundamental
> > problem.
>
> We had the same type of solution (just with a different binary producer,
> Fluendo) offered for MP3. We
fferent than a system level rpm.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
--
Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
anted, but they have to be scriptless
(pre/postinstall etc) and they need to live in a different yum reposet
and rpmdb than the things we consider integral parts of the operating
system.
--
Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
11 matches
Mail list logo
