current thunderbird.
>
That's a packaging bug; either thunderbird should obsolete _and_
provide thunderbird-lightning or thunderbird-lightning-gdata should be
changed to require thunderbird instead of -lightning. You should file
a bug so that the issue is tracked/fixed.
--
Ahmad Samir
s changing - again - for whatever reasons in the future.
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
box. Moreover, if I look into `journalctl -b`, I see time shifted during
> the boot process (which kind of messes up the history whenever I search in
> it). I haven't reported any bug yet, but there's certainly something not
> working out of the box there.
>
>
This is the bug th
d noticed that some time ago too, the easiest (laziest too) solution
I found was to stick this in my /etc/profile.d/custom.sh:
complete -F _yum dnf
I know the _yum completion function(s) probably needs a bit of
tweaking to match all the dnf cli options/syntax but it seems to work
well most of the tim
ill be updated in your profile, just like any
other user-installed extension.
So what you can do is just copy the dir from
/usr/lib*/thunderbird/distribution/extensions and restart Thunderbird
or re-install it from addons.mozilla.org, I think either would lead to
the same result.
--
Ahmad Samir
--
On 30 June 2015 at 17:22, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
>>
>> IIUC, what's happening here is that they bundle the extension with
>> Thunderbird 38 so it's installed and enabled by default; so when you
>> creat
ged the ESP mount options to add "noauto,x-systemd.automount", I
usually don't need to mount it at all.
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
re were
reasons for that, if those reasons haven't changed then there's no
point trying to revive it. Just the occasional email (1 per
month/week), doesn't need a separate ML IMHO.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--
> --
> devel mailing list
> deve
.3.0-2.fc20.x86_64 requires libLLVM-3.3.so()(64bit), but
none of the providers can be installed
This issue is being/was discussed in this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084129
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
oraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
$ yum list boost-static*
[...]
Available Packages
boost-static.i686
1.53.0-6.fc19fedora
boost-static.x86_64
1.53.0-8.fc19updates
it looks like boost-static-1.53.0-8.fc19.i686 is missing from x86_64
updates repo; but it's available in i386 updates repo:
e.g.
https://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/19/i386/boost-static-1.53.0-8.fc19.i686.rpm
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
tworkManager-sstp-gnome):
> > Requires: NetworkManager-sstp%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
You should add the epoch to the requires:
Requires: NetworkManager-sstp%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
[...]
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1] http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
> [2] https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
flash-plugin-11.2.202.440 is available in the yum repo hosted by
Adobe. But on[1] it doesn't say anything about the issue being fixed
for Linux.
[1]https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/a
On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>> On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
>>> 11.2.202.438
On 26 January 2015 at 15:16, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 02:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>>
>> On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>
On 26 January 2015 at 15:17, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 02:03 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>
mode,
> maybe there is a way to use a different value when booted into that.
> How that would look, I'm not sure. Maybe dracut would need to include
> an override file in the initramfs.
>
> josh
AFAIK the live images don't have a rescue mode/boot option; that mode
is only
please someone help me fixing this mess?
> --
> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
owngrading the offending package from the
> cache (rpm -Uvh --oldpackage).
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046244
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> F
x27;clean expire-cache' does, and more. (check
the man page)
It could be that dnf picked another mirror this time, or it used the
same mirror and that mirror has synced with the master mirror(s).
> --
> Garry T. Williams
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12 January 2014 21:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.01.2014 20:24, schrieb Ahmad Samir:
>> On 12 January 2014 21:06, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>>> On 1-12-14 18:18:00 M A Young wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>>>>> On
t;
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 21
> # Add AppStream metadata
> install -Dm 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.metainfo.xml
>
> %check
> appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
> %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.metainfo.xml
>
OPYING
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770371
>
>
It couldn't be included in the official Fedora repos, for whatever
technical reasons; but it's available in the rpmfusion free repos.
--
Ahmad Samir
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
u can set the
minimum font size for each language by changing the language in the
"Fonts for" drop-down list in the Firefox fonts settings dialogue
(Preferences -> Content -> Advanced).
--
Ahmad Samir
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ME desktop?
>
> I have this in my .bashrc:
>
> # Kill with fire.
> killall -9 -r tracker-.* >& /dev/null
>
> Seems to be the only way to permanently disable it that I have found
> (I'm not using GNOME).
>
> Rich.
On F25 (not su
On 30 November 2016 at 23:19, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 29 November 2016 at 16:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:39:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2016 02:15 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> >On Ter, 2016-11-22 at 18:57 -0600, Mic
(Sorry for the noise if you already know all that :)).
[1]https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/freetype.git/commit/?h=f29&id=3f1c63550795a1ce04006b0e8f2daae6ca0ec26a
[2] https://sourceforge.net/projects/freetype/files/freetype2/2.8.1/
--
Ahmad Samir
_
On 12/11/2018 03:35, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ahmad Samir wrote:
Try setting the lcdfilter in your local fonts.conf (
~/.config/fontconfing/fonts.conf); or better yet, try building freetype
with the "spr" patch disabled. This way freetype will use Harmony
(available since freetype 2.8
ooks like
Marketing is overruling the security/privacy devs in Mozilla, I think
he nailed the issue at the core of this debacle.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1425186
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RFAJJBMKK6C2BEWJKCVBOLPWTGCFHWPW/
--
Ahma
On 21 December 2017 at 21:05, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Ahmad Samir
> wrote:
>>
>> I found this upstream bug report[1], and it's reproducible. So,
>> there's something seriously screwed up upstream, and as someone said
ow_bug.cgi?id=105998
--
Ahmad Samir
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
by hand (by the font artists/devs) like the old font
families (e.g. DejaVu Sans) had - will look. So I enjoy many more
fonts on my 5 inch phone than I do on my 24 inch monitor :/
I think the solution to the problem will come when Hidpi monitors
become more affordable,
31 matches
Mail list logo
