On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:50 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 03:50 PM, Henrik Wejdmark wrote:
> > On my desktop it's not on "one" page, it's a mile long listing so you get no
> > overview at all. In Gnome2 at least all the apps are categorized. If the
> > graphical user interface _requi
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:04 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900
> 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>
>
> > Considering the frequent calls of "Gnome 3 has failed at its task" or
> > the "GUI has failed if the user must " makes me
> Perhaps the Gnome3 way of thinking is that calling up an additional
> application constitutes starting a new task in the work flow, so that
> the big interruption happens anyway. I don't think that is a good
> assumption for the design of a DE.
This is the sort of criticism that grants a clear
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:11 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
> > how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
> > from an (insecure) software simu
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:41 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> 2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz :
> > Yes, I completely agree. What Gregory tries to emphasis here - as I
> > understand it, of course he might have a different intention - is purely
> > politics and I do not think, that Fedora should involve in polit
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:48 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > First, the TPM (nor the CPU) really can't tell the difference between
> > the owner of the computer and an author of a virus.
>
> A jumper on the motherboard, or some other kind of physical circuit breaker,
> can
On 12/08/2011 05:12 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> Bandwidth is the big concern for the end user here and then the other
> issue is - is all of this worth it for building pkgs? I don't think it
> is, personally, pkg building is not that huge of a hit, afaict to
> getting things done.
>
> I mean the sum t
An idea just struck me that may work.
If the system is made light enough that it is utterly painless for
anyone to contribute processing time then cross-checking of hashes could
be made statistically secure, save for a widespread compromise of the
entire Fedora userbase.
For example, if I just
--- On Sat, 2012/3/31, Daniel E. Wilson wrote:
> Hi, my name is Dan and I have submitted the version 5.2.1 of the racket
> scheme interpreter for review.
>
> I use Lisp type languages for my own projects and needed a more recent
> version than the plt-scheme package for my Fedora box. When I
