Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

2016-02-08 Thread Šimon Lukašík
On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_ part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity". Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.

Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

2016-02-08 Thread Šimon Lukašík
On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_ part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity". Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.

Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

2016-02-09 Thread Šimon Lukašík
On 02/08/2016 05:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Šimon Lukašík wrote: Thing is just we have slightly different approach. Let me explain. Using OpenSCAP sounds great. Mostly, I wanted to focus on results and what the user sees rather than implementation