Re: Where has the kernel-doc package gone?

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nils K wrote: > > I found the origin of this change to be the following commit: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/b65f9ed036fca30c0684bfc6fe72d72a53e9867a?branch=f21 > (which is a revert of a revert to remove the kernel-doc subpackage). > The commit al

Re: GCC 15 for Fedora 42 in a side-tag

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 4:10 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 12:53:29PM -0700, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >

Re: lazy preemption in kernel 6.13

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:51 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I'm a little confused about this new type of preemption. > > "The long road to lazy preemption" [1] article says: > > "The lazy mode will occupy a place between PREEMPT_NONE and > PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY, replacing both of them." > > Whereas Linux

Re: GCC 15 for Fedora 42 in a side-tag

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no > >> side-tag). Is this in

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a): > > > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got > > > a few bugs that I've been testing and rollin

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:30 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:06 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > >

Re: Multiple kernels

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite wrote: > > > Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as OpenHarmony > support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on devices with a wide > range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and edge devices. Is >

Re: openQA test failures for Rawhide - sorry

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 2:57 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide > updates. > > Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something > in the kernel. > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0b8ce0290c (k

<    1   2   3