Re: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

2025-07-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 5:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > There is a bug for qemu

Fedora eln compose report: 20250716.n.0 changes

2025-07-15 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250715.n.1 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250716.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 304 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 34.17 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

2025-07-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, There is a bug for qemu which was assigned to "Fedora Virtualization Maintainers" in Bugzilla by default: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2375004 But that account is disabled. """ You can't ask Fedora Virtualization Maintainers because that account is disabled. """ How do we reach the

Re: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

2025-07-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > There is a bug for qemu which was assigned to "Fedora Virtualization > Maintainers" in Bugzilla by default: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2375004 > > But that account is disabled. > > """ > You can't ask Fedora Virtual

DNF5 using Anaconda released to Rawhide

2025-07-15 Thread mkolman
Hi! Just a brief heads-up that today anaconda 43.30 has been released to Rawhide - this switches the backend for package installations from DNF 4 to DNF 5[0]. Support for package modularity has been removed[1], but other than that there should not be any end-user visible changes. If you see any

Re: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

2025-07-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, There is a bug for qemu which was assigned to "Fedora Virtualization Maintainers" in Bugzilla by default: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2375004 But that account is disabled. """

Re: flowblade problem using pyproject_* macros

2025-07-15 Thread Martin Gansser
Thank you very much for your help, it now works. Regards Martin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/

flowblade problem using pyproject_* macros

2025-07-15 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, after using the pyproject_* macros for flowblade [1], the compilation fails with the following error message: Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FtJ5fH + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD/flowblade-2.22-build + cd flowblade-2.22 + echo pyproject-rpm-macros + e

Re: flowblade problem using pyproject_* macros

2025-07-15 Thread Michael J Gruber
Martin Gansser venit, vidit, dixit 2025-07-15 11:04:08: > Hi, > > after using the pyproject_* macros for flowblade [1], the compilation fails > with the following error message: > > Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FtJ5fH > + umask 022 > + cd /builddir/build/BUILD/

Re: flowblade problem using pyproject_* macros

2025-07-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 07. 25 11:04, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, after using the pyproject_* macros for flowblade [1], the compilation fails with the following error message: Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FtJ5fH + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD/flowblade-2.22-build + cd f

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide NOTICE corrected side tag

2025-07-15 Thread Kaleb Keithley
Side tag has been merged https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-d43031d477 On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 1:16 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and > python-pyarrow*.rpm. Updating to Arrow 20.0.0 > > Correction Correcti

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-07-15)

2025-07-15 Thread Michel Lind
On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 11:31 -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org > on Matrix. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at >   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto >

Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250715.n.2 nightly compose nominated for testing

2025-07-15 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250715.n.2. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Introducing Provides bash(*)

2025-07-15 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:23 AM Cristian Le via devel wrote: > During the review of bash-preexec [1] we came up on the issue that > according to the documentation, this package would be in conflict with > any other bash script that use the variable `PROMPT_COMMAND` or `DEBUG` > > > # Note: This m

Re: Fedora Virtualization Maintainers account disabled in Bugzilla

2025-07-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > There is a bug for qemu which was assigned to "Fedora Virtualization > > > Maintainers" in Bugzi

Re: Introducing Provides bash(*)

2025-07-15 Thread Cristian Le via devel
On 2025/07/15 16:06, Jerry James wrote: These days PROMPT_COMMAND is an array. You can add to it, rather than override it. Thanks for that insight. It seems that the array is supported [1], and the note is outdated? I can't read the bash script there well, but isn't the DEBUG trap also no

Re: Introducing Provides bash(*)

2025-07-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Cristian Le via devel wrote: > Hi all, > > During the review of bash-preexec [1] we came up on the issue that according > to the documentation, this package would be in conflict with any other bash > script that use the variable `PROMPT_COMMAND` or `DEBUG`

Fedora eln compose report: 20250715.n.1 changes

2025-07-15 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250714.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250715.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 634.43 KiB Size of dropped packages:3.28 MiB

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-07-15)

2025-07-15 Thread Michel Lind
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-07-15 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Introducing Provides bash(*)

2025-07-15 Thread Cristian Le via devel
Hi all, During the review of bash-preexec [1] we came up on the issue that according to the documentation, this package would be in conflict with any other bash script that use the variable `PROMPT_COMMAND` or `DEBUG` #  Note: This module requires two Bash features which you must not otherwi

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Use update-alternatives for managing NodeJS symlinks (self contained)

2025-07-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14. 07. 25 v 16:27 Jan Stanek napsal(a): Hello everyone! On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 9:09 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 10/07/2025 13:14, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: We aim to move away from manual management of /usr/bin/node, /usr/bin/npm, and similar symlinks to leverag

Re: Request for advice for soname bump with FTBFS dependencies

2025-07-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 07. 25 v 7:16 Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a): I have a (somewhat?) strange situation (or at least strange for me, maybe others have this on a regular basis), that I wish to understand how to proceed. I have a library (libcbor, if it matters) which has a new version with a soname bump. It wi

Re: Request for advice for soname bump with FTBFS dependencies

2025-07-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 15. 07. 25 v 10:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 13. 07. 25 v 7:16 Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a): I have a (somewhat?) strange situation (or at least strange for me, maybe others have this on a regular basis), that I wish to understand how to proceed. I have a library (libcbor, if it matters) wh