Hello Fedora,
My name is Tim Wendt. I switched to Fedora about three years ago, and I
currently use the Fedora Sway Spin.
I have been co-maintaining an automated ROS 2 COPR to package ROS 2
packages on Fedora [1][2]. I am an undergraduate student at FH Aachen in
Mechanical Engineering, focusing s
Hey Matthew (and rest of council),
On Thu, May 22, 2025, at 5:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven
> Packager rights from a contributor.
The linked issue is private, are there plans to make it public in some
form or shape so we can s
On 5/22/25 11:15, Matthew Miller wrote:
The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven
Packager rights from a contributor.
FESCo didn't have a specific policy for dealing with a request to remove
Proven Packager rights. In addition, the FESCo process was handled entirely
i
To update on the current status, I have created a hackmd document [1]. I
haven't filled it in with the packages that were fixed so far.
If anyone wants to pick up any of the packages, feel free to edit the
document and mark the package as assigned (🗳️). I have left it very
open, but please don
On 5/21/25 11:00, yselkow...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-05-22 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
Per agreement at last week's meeting, this week's meeting is CANCELED
due to Red Hat Summit.
--
Yaakov
The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven
Packager rights from a contributor.
FESCo didn't have a specific policy for dealing with a request to remove
Proven Packager rights. In addition, the FESCo process was handled entirely
in private. The contributor didn't receive
FESCO stated they was assembling the facts back in december but wanted to
discuss it with the revoked person first.
I’ve have not seen anymore on that since then so I assume they are still
working on it
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 19:08, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 5/22/25 11:15, Matthew Miller wr
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 19:20, Roy Bekken wrote:
>
> FESCO stated they was assembling the facts back in december but wanted to
> discuss it with the revoked person first.
I had a conversation with a member of FESCo and the FPL about the
situation some time ago.
> I’ve have not seen anymore on th
On Thu, 2025-05-22 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> The lack of a defined process for situations like this needs to be
> addressed
> before such a decision can be made, including provisions for
> appropriate
> warnings and chances to respond by the contributor. In addition, the
> announcemen
>
> Is the *middle* of an election cycle -- when some have already voted --
> really the time for this? Couldn't this have been done beforehand? Is
> FESCo planning on responding to this also during the elections?
>
All parties - Council, FESCo and Peter, were aware beforehand that the
council i
Am 22.05.25 um 11:33 schrieb Miro HronÄŤok:
On 21. 05. 25 20:08, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Hey all, while trying to build some centos-stream packages via git in
COPR, recently I get
error: %patchN is obsolete, use %patch N (or %patch -P N)
aborted builds. I can patch the specs files for al
On 21. 05. 25 20:08, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Hey all, while trying to build some centos-stream packages via git in COPR,
recently I get
error: %patchN is obsolete, use %patch N (or %patch -P N)
aborted builds. I can patch the specs files for all builds but (question) is
there a compat s
I corrected ezstream license tag from "GPL-2.0-only AND
LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT" to "GPL-2.0-only AND ISC".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
Dne 21. 05. 25 v 8:08 odp. Leon Fauster via devel napsal(a):
Hey all, while trying to build some centos-stream packages via git in COPR,
recently I get
error: %patchN is obsolete, use %patch N (or %patch -P N)
aborted builds. I can patch the specs files for all builds but (question) is there a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250521.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250522.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 117.88 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi,
a new problem arose while upgrading from F40 to F41:
# systemctl status systemd-udevd.service
â—‹ systemd-udevd.service - Rule-based Manager for Device Events and Files
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service; static)
Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/service.d
Hi,
I am currently preparing a new version of the speed-dreams [3] package for
Fedora.
I have a question about the duplicate files [1] in the package, there are a lot
of them,
how should this be handled?
The second question concerns the listing of the individual files and the
assignment of th
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:00:04PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> The second question concerns the listing of the individual files and the
> assignment of the SPDX license [2]
> in the rpm spec file.
>
> [2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/licensecheck_spdx.txt
> [3] https://martin
> ektype-mukta-fontsorphan 2 weeks
> ago
> libxeddsa orphan 2 weeks
> ago
> poezioorphan 2 weeks
> ago
> python-slixmpporph
python-backcall @epel-packagers-sig, @python-0 weeks ago
packagers-sig, orion, orphan,
salimma
python-pathtools @python-packagers-sig, orphan2 weeks ago
20 matches
Mail list logo
