Re: Fedora survey data

2025-04-25 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 16:45, Przemek Klosowski via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Roy Bekken recently quoted Fedora version usage data from > > https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html > > but on inspection it looks that, while the analysis and plot

Re: RFC: Lightweight stalled request process

2025-04-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, some things I wonder about this process (in no particular order): > > If this lightweight process is easier, will not people just use it over > the normal process? So, it will be harder to see who is completely > unresponsive. There will

Cryptominisat soname bump

2025-04-25 Thread Jerry James
In a week, I plan to update cryptominisat in Rawhide to version 5.13.0, which comes with an soname bump. I will also rebuild cvc5 and yices, the only two consumers of cryptominisat in Fedora. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ devel mailing

is gone from rawhide

2025-04-25 Thread Florian Weimer
With the update to glibc-2.41.9000-11.fc43, is no longer there, and some historic terminal-related baggage is no longer included in . These terminal interfaces were alread obsolete when Linux was first released, so glibc upstream did not issue a formal deprecation issue. If something includes ,

Re: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional no longer exists for gating

2025-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2025-04-25 at 12:19 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:59 AM Cristian Le via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On 2025/04/25 11:44, Dimitris Soumis wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > By defining a > > > > - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: > > f

fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional no longer exists for gating

2025-04-25 Thread Dimitris Soumis
Hello, By defining a - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional} in gating.yaml as stated in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/gating/, it seems is no longer available and the t

Notification: Closure of Failed Compose Issues from Last Release Cycle - Fedora 42

2025-04-25 Thread Anton Medvedev
Hello, folks! 😉 We will close all failed compose issues that occurred over the last release cycle in the Pagure Failed Composes Repository[1]. This action will result in email notifications for each issue. Currently, there are 747 issues, meaning 747 email notifications will be triggered. To avoi

Re: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional no longer exists for gating

2025-04-25 Thread Cristian Le via devel
On 2025/04/25 11:44, Dimitris Soumis wrote: Hello, By defining a |- !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional} | in gating.yaml as stated in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/g

Taking over the mirrormanager2 package

2025-04-25 Thread Aurelien Bompard
Hey folks! I'm taking over the mirrormanager2 package and the infra SIG will co-maintain it. We no longer use the RPM to deploy it in the Fedora infra, but the RPM still contains the reporting clients that some (private) mirrors use to report their status. With the recent inclusion of python-mrt

Re: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional no longer exists for gating

2025-04-25 Thread Nikita Popov
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:59 AM Cristian Le via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 2025/04/25 11:44, Dimitris Soumis wrote: > > Hello, > > By defining a > > - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: > fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional} > > > in gating.yaml >

Re: RFC: Lightweight stalled request process

2025-04-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > So, some things I wonder about this process (in no particular order): > > > > If this lightweight process is easier, will not people just use it over > > the normal proces

Re: Fedora survey data

2025-04-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:34:52AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > The data here was supposed to be end-of-lifed before F40 as it was to be > replaced with a different tool. The scripts are a POC which became > production years and years ago. Most of the work is done by a basic awk > script whic

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

2025-04-25 Thread Tomi Lähteenmäki
On 2025-01-23 10:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: marker atim I wish I would have noticed this; started un-retirement process, review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362370 -Tomi -- ___ devel mailing list -