Hello,
I'm having trouble cloning a forked repository from
https://src.fedoraproject.org/ via SSH. I have uploaded my SSH key to
pagure, but I still see the error:
*You need to upload SSH key to be able to clone over SSH*
Could someone help me troubleshoot this? (I am in the packager group)
Thanks
On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
writes:
* This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
runtime dependency on libstdc++.
I am not too happy about yet another dependency. As someone involved in
building containers, I constantly have to
Hi Nikola,
I don't know how you've tried cloning but this works for me: "fedpkg clone
forks//rpms/".
Regards
Konrad
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:15 PM Nikola Davidova wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm having trouble cloning a forked repository from
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/ via SSH. I have uploaded my
Try log out and then log in again into src.fedoraproject.org. User data is only
refreshed upon logging in.
Inviato da Proton Mail Android
Messaggio originale
13/03/25 13:12, Nikola Davidova ha scritto:
> Hello,
> I'm having trouble cloning a forked repository from
> https://
Hi Nikola,
you mean the issue is when you clone on the command line but with the URL
from the website, right?
In that case, check that your ~/.ssh/config has no special entry for the
git server and that you are cloning as the user that owns the keys.
Also you might want to enable verbose SSH lik
It's been more than one week. Are we ready to land this side tag?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 22:44, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 21:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > I just want check, if I'm thinki
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 11:30:07AM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 9:49 AM Marián Konček wrote:
> >
> > When running a container with current Fedora Rawhide and installing
> > `maven`, which transitiely causes the installation of `openh264`, I am
> > getting an error:
> >
On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 14:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 22:44, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 21:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 09:07, Jakub Jelinek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:31:35PM +
On 13. 03. 25 19:39, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 03. 25 18:50, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce
wrote:
This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable
releases as wel
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > >
> > > We have been emailing daily the following user
OLD: Fedora-42-20250312.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250313.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
It works in command line, the problem is only on the web.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:45 PM Nikola Davidova wrote:
> This is what I meant:
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:37 PM Konrad Kleine wrote:
>
>> Hi Nikola,
>>
>> I don't know how you've tried cloning but this works for
Please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
so it can be debugged if there is a problem with the backend of src (a
pagure instance) or with the IDM system.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 08:15, Nikola Davidova wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm having trouble cloning a forked repository
This is what I meant:
[image: image.png]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:37 PM Konrad Kleine wrote:
> Hi Nikola,
>
> I don't know how you've tried cloning but this works for me: "fedpkg clone
> forks//rpms/".
>
> Regards
> Konrad
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:15 PM Nikola Davidova
> wrote:
>
>> Hell
The Fedora Linux 42 Beta RC1.4 compose is GO and will be shipped live
on Tuesday, March 18 2025.
Final Freeze will start on Tuesday, April 1 (no joke!) for Fedora
Linux 42 Final.
For more information on today's release go/no-go meeting please check
the meeting minutes[2] or log[3].
[1] https://f
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250312.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250313.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:11
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 170
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.57 GiB
Size of dropped packages
Fabio is going to handle builds. Thank you, Fabio!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/cod
It seems nothing except GStreamer has been rebuilt.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/co
On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce
wrote:
> This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable
> releases as well.
Hi,
are you really going to intentionally break all the stable releases? I
thought there is a strict policy, and a big no-no, to _n
On 13. 03. 25 18:50, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce
wrote:
This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable
releases as well.
Hi,
are you really going to intentionally break all the stable releases? I
thought there is
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 03. 25 18:50, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> > > This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable
> > > releases as well.
>
> However, if peop
On 3/12/25 6:37 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 12. 03. 25 v 4:57 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
error: invalid sysuser type: u!
4< (%error)
error: lua script failed: [string "add_sysuser"]:22: error expanding macro
3<(%lua)
2< (%add_sysuser)
error: lua script failed:
Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
writes:
> * This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
> runtime dependency on libstdc++.
I am not too happy about yet another dependency. As someone involved in
building containers, I constantly have to battle the growth of
everything and now
Panu Matilainen writes:
> On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
>> writes:
>>
>>> * This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
>>> runtime dependency on libstdc++.
>>
>> I am not too happy about yet another dependency. As someone involve
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
> > have set in FAS does not correspond to a val
On 3/12/25 12:45 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 10:36 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
It's exactly for reasons like this that rpm will not even try to
automatically setup the signing - it has no way of knowing what the
right thing is.
Mock has it's own signing plugin, rpm wont int
Dne 13. 03. 25 v 8:31 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 3/12/25 12:45 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 10:36 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
It's exactly for reasons like this that rpm will not even try to automatically setup the signing - it has no way of
knowing what the right thin
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:42 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Panu Matilainen writes:
>
> > On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
> >> Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> >> writes:
> >>
> >>> * This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
> >>> runtime dependency on libstdc++.
> >>
>
Alexander Sosedkin writes:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:42 AM Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> Panu Matilainen writes:
>>
>> > On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> >> Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
>> >> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> * This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
>> >
According to Fedora packaging guidelines, building Java documentation
(-javadoc) packages is now optional. It was previously mandatory,
then recommended, and is now left entirely to the maintainer's
discretion.
As the primary maintainer of many Java packages, I have decided to
obsolete and remove
V Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:26:31AM +0200, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
> On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> > writes:
> >
> > > * This is the first version of rpm built as C++, so rpm gains a
> > > runtime dependency on libstdc++.
> >
> > I am not too hap
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 6:19 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Alexander Sosedkin writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:42 AM Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Panu Matilainen writes:
> >>
> >> > On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
> >> >> Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> >> >> writes:
> >> >>
>
On 3/13/25 10:05 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 13. 03. 25 v 8:31 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 3/12/25 12:45 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 10:36 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
It's exactly for reasons like this that rpm will not even try to
automatically setup the signing -
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 30
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-42-20250313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
36 matches
Mail list logo
