> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> Let's take a step back. Does it make sense to implement complicated
> and fragile scriptlets in packages?
No, of course not.
> Can we *please* get rid of this footgun that has been a continous
> source of problems?
The mantra on the packaging committ
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 259
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 227.54 MiB
Size of dropped packages:172.50
Good evening!
Aside from a handful of downgrades that already appear to be reported, my
primary system didn't encounter any issues with the transaction.
Transaction Summary:
Installing:68 packages
Upgrading: 4188 packages
Replacing: 4205 packages
Removing: 8 pack
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:24:53PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> On my x86_64:
>
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-39.fc38.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/
On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
but the package is tagged into rawhide.
But the package needs to be obsoleted anyway. I'll add it
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
> > c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
> > but the package is tag
OLD: Fedora-42-20250304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:97.15 MiB
Size of
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:47:30PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
> some errors:
>
> > Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> > requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the prov
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync
I got a new (= not yet reported) failure:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.
Hi all,
Please be advised that due to a number of outstanding unresolved
blockers[1] for F42 beta, we are cancelling this week's go/no-go meeting
tomorrow, March 6.
We will instead meet next Thursday, March 13 @ 1700 UTC in
#fedora-meeting[2] to determine the status of Fedora Linux 42 Beta. The n
Hi,
recently we were faced with a bug that caused an infinite loop in a
container. It was from a package (node.js) retaining a scriptlet to
replace a directory as recommended in Fedora Guidelines [0].
There the errno and reason returned [1] is effectively ignored. Only
whether the operation
I started testing the patches in MariaDB and MySQL.
I merged PRs to other packages, but since MariaDB and MySQL share the
same user and group config, I want to check if it works fine for them
in various combinations.
However I noticed a behavior that surprised me:
When installing MariaDB on Fedora
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-03-06 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10979/
--
___
devel mailin
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:47:36AM +0100, Jarek Prokop via packaging wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently we were faced with a bug that caused an infinite loop in a
> container. It was from a package (node.js) retaining a scriptlet to replace
> a directory as recommended in Fedora Guidelines [0].
> Thoughts?
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250304.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250305.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 104
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:26:44PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> I started testing the patches in MariaDB and MySQL.
> I merged PRs to other packages, but since MariaDB and MySQL share the
> same user and group config, I want to check if it works fine for them
> in various combinations.
>
> Howeve
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 13:16:04 -0800, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:08 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to use 'fedpkg mockbuild' to
> > easily build for a side tag.
> >
> > I know that it's possible by using 'koji mock-config' and then 'fed
Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to use 'fedpkg mockbuild' to
easily build for a side tag.
I know that it's possible by using 'koji mock-config' and then 'fedpkg
mockbuild --mock-config' but this is not easy since it requires
creating a local mock configuration file. Would be nice if it we
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:08 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to use 'fedpkg mockbuild' to
> easily build for a side tag.
>
> I know that it's possible by using 'koji mock-config' and then 'fedpkg
> mockbuild --mock-config' but this is not easy since it requires
19 matches
Mail list logo
