On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:50 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 05:53:46PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> napsal(a):
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
> > FIPS compatible and corresponding API is deprecat
On 24/02/2025 18:53, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
We disable support of building engines in OpenSSL and remove the
deprecated openssl-devel-engine subpackage.
What happens if a third-party application (such as Steam) tries to
import and use ENGINE_ symbols from the shared library pr
On Пан, 24 лют 2025, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslNoBuildEngine
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-disabling-support-of-building-openssl-engines-system-wide/145922
This is a proposed Chang
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:13 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 24/02/2025 18:53, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> > We disable support of building engines in OpenSSL and remove the
> > deprecated openssl-devel-engine subpackage.
>
> What happens if a
On 2/24/25 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, that's not really true, is it? This has already been done for
> F42. Why are things happening in this order?
It seems some variants have already implemented this change, the change
itself is listed as targeting "Fedora 42" on the wiki page.
On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 09:30, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen this? Frustratingly I can't reproduce locally.
> Last time we saw and fixed this issue was 4 years ago.
Hmm, it's certainly something in the latest release.
> A reproducer is welcome because the mistake probably hap
OLD: Fedora-42-20250224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> ...
>> == Detailed Description ==
>> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
>> FIPS compatible and corresponding API is deprecated since OpenSSL 3.0.
>> The engine functionality we are aware of (PKCS#11, TPM) i
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250224.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250225.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 114
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hey there,
After doing my best to maintain Google Cloud's packages in Fedora, I'd
like to give up these packages to someone who could spend more time
maintaining them. I don't use Google Cloud in my daily work and these
packages move quickly. Some of the agents now depend on each other and
depende
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250226.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 27
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 206.61 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hi,
> On 25. Feb 2025, at 10:29, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> When a host is in FIPS mode, presumably openssl should already
> automatically disable all functionality that isn't FIPS compatible.
There’s a large number of places that would need to be patched to achieve that.
Upstream’s position
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 06:48, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> >> ...
>> >> == Detailed Description ==
>> >> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are no
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:48 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> >> ...
>> >> == Detailed Description ==
>> >> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines ar
Hello,
According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/android-tools/pull-request/8,
it seems like van hasn't been active for at least a year or so. Does
anyone have a way to contact him? I'd like to help maintaining
android-tools.
- Łukasz
--
___
deve
On Аўт, 25 лют 2025, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
> Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> ...
>> == Detailed Description ==
>> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
>> FIPS compatible and corres
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 05:53:46PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslNoBuildEngine
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-disabling-support-of-building-openssl-engines-system-wide/145922
Hey,
With the help of this information I can actually reproduce the issue quite
reliably in a local podman container:
$ podman run -it --rm --pull always fedora:rawhide
# rpm -q dnf5
dnf5-5.2.10.0-2.fc43.x86_64
# stty cols 1 && dnf5 reinstall bash -y
Updating and loading repositories:
Fedora -
On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 15:29 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:50:53PM
> +0100, mkol...@redhat.com napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 18:34 +, Richard Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > My CI has been failing for the last 24h with:
> > >
> > > [ 4/48] Instal
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-02-25/fesco.2025-02-25-17.00.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-02-25/fesco.2025-02-25-17.00.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:55:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> 'fedrq wr -b rawhide openssl-devel-engine | wc -l' says 62.
That list should have been in the proposal! Here it is anyway ...
bind-32:9.18.33-1.fc43.src
boinc-client-8.0.2-2.fc42.src
cpprest-2.10.19-6.fc42.src
curl-8.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>
>
> > Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
> >> ...
> >> == Detailed Description ==
> >> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
> >> FIPS compatible and corresponding API is deprecated since OpenS
[Folks, please remove devel-announce from CC when replying.]
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:15:27PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Anybody who is still relying on engines needs to start
> > looking at a transition, the earlier the better. At best,
> > you’re buying yourself a year by rejecting t
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-02-25 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
V Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:50:53PM +0100, mkol...@redhat.com napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 18:34 +, Richard Hughes via devel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My CI has been failing for the last 24h with:
> >
> > [ 4/48] Installing fwupd-0:2.0.7-0.1alpha.fc41.x86_64 100% | 39.9
> > MiB
> > term
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
Looking at the tarball, I do not see normal python setup.py.
It also looks like the tarball bundles other RadeonProRendering projects.
Looking at these projects, they do not seem to be active.
The inactive projects are a red flag for me. I w
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> > Providing a dummy engine.h that does not actually contain any of
> > the definitions that engine.h is supposed to provide feels like
> > the kind of thing we should not do downstream only. It is liable
> > to break any configure t
On Thu, 2025-02-20 at 18:34 +, Richard Hughes via devel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My CI has been failing for the last 24h with:
>
> [ 4/48] Installing fwupd-0:2.0.7-0.1alpha.fc41.x86_64 100% | 39.9
> MiB
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error'
> what(): basic_strin
28 matches
Mail list logo
