# F42 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2025-02-24
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 42 blocker review meeting! We have 8
proposed blockers and 7 proposed freeze exceptio
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250222.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250223.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 224
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as OpenHarmony
support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on devices with a wide
range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and edge devices. Is this
something Fedora would consider doing? This would potentia
OLD: Fedora-42-20250221.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250222.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hot news:
- the review of licenses in queue has been stalled for several weeks
Two weeks ago we had:
* 24347spec files in Fedora
* 30986license tags in all spec files
* 127 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with
LicenseRef-Callaway-*)
* 2246tags have not b
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250221.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250222.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 317
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hi provenpackagers,
Does anyone have cycles to roll Fedora builds for this nasty CVE in PostgreSQL?
RHEL got patched, but nothing for Fedora yet...
Thanks,
--
Bojan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
I orphan GConf2, due to lack of time.
Should be no issues with the package itself. Request to the branch for
epel10 is pending:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2347052
~buc
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote:
Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as OpenHarmony
support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on devices with a wide
range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and edge devices. Is this
something Fedora