Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250217.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250216.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250217.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 71 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.20 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

Hi, […] + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f /builddir/build/BUILD/input-remapper-2.1.1-build/input-remapper-2.1.1-1.fc42.x86_64-pyproject-modules Check import: inputremapper Check import: inputremapper.bin Check import: inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_control Che

Fedora 42 compose report: 20250217.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-42-20250216.n.0 NEW: Fedora-42-20250217.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 54 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.20 KiB Size of dropped packages:15.27 MiB

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 13:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 2/15/25 9:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:31 -0500

Re: Intent to orphan evolution-mapi and openchange packages for f43

On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 10:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > I believe it's time to retire the MAPI protocol in Fedora. I'll wait > with the orphan for one week. Hi, as announced the last week, I just orphaned evolution-mapi and openchange packages in the Fedora (I clicked the "Orphan" button in

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

Yes, the windows install exists in BIOS and yes if I manually select the entry it will boot into windows. However, when I do not enter BIOS and just try booting normally I boot loop consistently. I can confirm windows is the only entry in the bios list, fedora isn't anywhere on there. I can a

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

On 17. 02. 25 2:45, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Alexander Ploumistos said: I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I guess some change to the test units has led to this error: […] + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f /builddir/bu

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 20:51, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2025-02-15 at 14:54 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:31 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > IMO the bar would only need to be th

Heads-up: msgraph soname bump in F43 and F42

Hi, in one week (2025-02-24), I plan to update the msgraph package from 0.2.3 to 0.3.3[1] in F43 and F42. It is an API-breaking update with SONAME version bump. I will also update the only dependent package - gvfs to 1.57.2 version that needs the updated msgraph package. I will use side tags for t

Re: hdf5 and netcdf soname update coming to rawhide, perhaps F42

On 2/10/25 19:38, Orion Poplawski wrote: Later this week I will be updating hdf5 to 1.14.6 from 1.14.5 and netcdf to 4.6.3 in a side tag in rawhide.  Some notes: For a long time, hdf5 would emit a warning if a program linked to a version of hdf5 that did not *exactly* match the full version of

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

> On 17 Feb 2025, at 10:40, Frenzy Biscuit wrote: > > However, when I do not enter BIOS and just try booting normally I boot loop > consistently. In the past I have seen issues when there were uefi variables that needed removing. At the time I use the manufacture’s documented way to complete

Re: Can't create EPEL 10 branch: Did not manage to rebase this pull-request

V Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 06:58:19PM -0500, Neel Chauhan napsal(a): > Hi, > > I'm trying to create an EPEL 10 branch for a package I maintain, ttyd: > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/72348 > > I am getting this issue in Pagure: > > === > Traceback (most recent call last): > Fil

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) and liborc (Apache ORC) SONAME bumps in rawhide

Side tag merged. (Thanks Ben.) On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 6:00 AM Ben Beasley wrote: > All three builds completed successfully. If I haven’t missed anything, it > should be safe to merge the side tag at any time. > On 2/13/25 10:03 PM, Ben Beasley wrote: > > I’ve used provenpackager privilege to

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 10:35 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > One more question: are packagers able to restart the tests? > > > > > > @Dusty Mabe  will know better, but I don't > > think packagers can restart the tests currently. > > No. Not currently. But it is

Heads up: python-notmuch to be removed

Hi there notmuch (the mail indexer) so far comes with two sets of python bindings: - python3-notmuch aka legacy bindings - python3-notmuch2 cffi bindings The legacy bindings had been deprecated since notmuch 0.30 (2020-07-10). In Fedora, notmuch currently is at version 0.38 (all active branches)

Re: Retiring rdist and rssh in Rawhide

Just a follow-up that I have retired rdist in Rawhide. Regards, Michal Ruprich On 1/27/25 08:41, Michal Ruprich wrote: Hi, this is just a quick message that I'll be retiring rdist package in Rawhide. The Upstream of rdist is long gone and it has been recently hit with the GCC15 and is curre

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said: > On 17. 02. 25 2:45, Chris Adams wrote: > >Once upon a time, Alexander Ploumistos said: > >>I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I > >>guess some change to the test units has led to this error: > >> > >>[…] > >>+ /usr/bin/python3 -

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 11:06 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 20:51, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2025-02-15 at 14:54 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:31 -

Re: Inactive provenpackagers for the F42 cycle

The package I maintain, xtrkcad, releases every 2 years give or take. If it weren't for a build failure in f42 I would not need to build until the next package release. So I actively maintain xtrkcad but do so infrequently as package releases become available. On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 1:12 PM Mattia

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On 2/17/25 1:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 10:35 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> >>> One more question: are packagers able to restart the tests? >>> >>> >>> @Dusty Mabe  will know better, but I don't >>> think packagers can restart the tests c

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On 2/17/25 1:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 11:06 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 20:51, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2025-02-15 at 14:54 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:40:29PM -0800, Adam William

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

On 2/17/25 5:12 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 13:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 2/15/25 9:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

Thank you all very much for your input. A long time ago I had needed to run some graphical tests in %check and I vaguely remember using some dummy driver which was then superseded(?) by xvfb and then for some reason I stopped needing to care about all that and that cache in my brain got flushed. T

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

On 2/17/25 11:47 AM, luciano s. wrote: I won't have a source for what I said right now, but likely searching for Secure Boot + TPM2 issues when dual booting will help Hope that helps, Mateus Rodrigues Costa Is it that what you mentioned ? : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849

Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

Hello team, I stumble in Radeon ProRender engine [1] and attempt to package it following the python guideline: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/designsuite/blender/build/8665473/ It seems an alternative to both Blender Cycles engine (has issue for AMD GCN architecture with newer ROCm

packit and mass prebuild

It seems like it would be very helpful to integrate something like mass prebuild [1] with packit [2]. As such, I've filed the following request [3] for integration if possible. In the meantime, I've found that a mpb.config like: arch: x86_64 chroot: fedora-rawhide packages: python-sphinx-ga

Re: Fedora 42 breaks new windows installations

> I won't have a source for what I said right now, but likely searching for > Secure Boot + TPM2 issues when dual booting will help > Hope that helps, > Mateus Rodrigues Costa Is it that what you mentioned ? : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849 --

Inactive provenpackagers for the F42 cycle

In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the provenpackager group. Note that