On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 21:22, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> So, over at upstream they raised the suspicion that some parts of what
> I'm linking are compiled with different flags. To recap: I get
> ```
> /usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_vector.h:1262: std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::reference std::vector<_Tp
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250205.n.3
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 14.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-42-20250204.n.2
NEW: Fedora-42-20250206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 82
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 17.02 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi,
I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem,
basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early
filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easiest to
eliminate: it has no files and no scriptlets.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/filesystem/pull-req
Am 06.02.25 um 17:59 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
Am 06.02.25 um 13:58 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
Hello,
just a short head-up:
I planning to builld NLopt-2.10.0 for Rawhide and F42 during later
today, which will bump its soname from libnlopt.so0 to libnlopt.so.1.
The following packa
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
> yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could
> probably be achieved by that PR.
> There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are
> occasionally bug reports (that should be filed a
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 18:01 +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> == Feedback ==
> No feedback is received.
As a tomcat user , this remove of tomcat-servlet-api, tomcat-el-api,
and tomcat-jsp-api doesn't affect me
BTW I'd like to fix tomcat 9 in RHEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-02-06/eln.2025-02-06-20.00.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-02-06/eln.2025-02-06-20.00.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matri
Hi Zbigniew,
yes, basesystem is there just to ensure installation order and it could
probably be achieved by that PR.
There is one more benefit from the retirement - as there are
occasionally bug reports (that should be filed against distribution)
reported as basesystem issues (similarly to setup p
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem,
> basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early
> filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easiest to
> eliminate: it has no
Hello,
just a short head-up:
I planning to builld NLopt-2.10.0 for Rawhide and F42 during later
today, which will bump its soname from libnlopt.so0 to libnlopt.so.1.
The following packages are affected:
* freefem++ (failed in COPR, but builds on Koji [2])
* pagmo2
* prusa-slicer (already FTB
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePythonNose
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-retire-python-nose-self-contained/144198
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
proc
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_el,_jsp_and_servlet_packages_from_tomcat
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-remove-el-jsp-and-servlet-packages-from-tomcat-self-contained/144199
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This docume
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 01:48 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 23:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please
> > > let me
>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 07:50:24AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem,
> > basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early
> > filesyst
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:51 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
wrote:
> BTW I'd like to fix tomcat 9 in RHEL9
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331858
>
> how we contact RH maintainer ?
You can open a Jira issue at https://issues.redhat.com/
--
Mikolaj
>
>
> Thank you
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing. Upstream
> has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes sense.
>
> For posterity here are the potential affected packages:
>
> $ fedrq whatrequires-src -
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:09 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> python-cramjam dropped i686 with this:
>
> commit 3ebdbdac596b6f01c97b89d3b67635519b10b944
> Author: Benjamin A. Beasley
> Date: Mon Sep 30 19:24:11 2024 -0400
>
> F41+: Drop i686 support (leaf package on that architecture)
>
>
Hot news:
- the review of licenses in queue has been stalled for several weeks
Two weeks ago we had:
* 24401spec files in Fedora
* 31038license tags in all spec files
* 142 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with
LicenseRef-Callaway-*)
* 2289 tags have not
Hi Kaleb,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:03 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and
> python-pyarrow*.rpm. Updating to Arrow 19.0.0
>
> ORC packages include liborc2*.rpm. Updating to ORC 2.1.0
>
> side-tag f43-build-side-105129 has been cre
It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing.
Upstream has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes
sense.
For posterity here are the potential affected packages:
$ fedrq whatrequires-src --branch rawhide --format source
--exclude-subpackages openexr
CImg
I’ve suggested https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openexr/pull-request/9
to restore i686 support and skip the failing test, at least for the time
being.
On 2/6/25 7:15 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A s
python-cramjam dropped i686 with this:
commit 3ebdbdac596b6f01c97b89d3b67635519b10b944
Author: Benjamin A. Beasley
Date: Mon Sep 30 19:24:11 2024 -0400
F41+: Drop i686 support (leaf package on that architecture)
While many packages depend on this one, we believe we have correctly
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250206.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250207.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 23
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 2/6/25 18:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:09 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
python-cramjam dropped i686 with this:
commit 3ebdbdac596b6f01c97b89d3b67635519b10b944
Author: Benjamin A. Beasley
Date: Mon Sep 30 19:24:11 2024 -0400
F41+: Drop i686 support (lea
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:16 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > It seems to be the only reason for FTBFS. A single test is failing.
> Upstream has no interest in supporting 32bit anymore, which I think makes
> sense.
> >
>
> IMO this is much to
Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and
python-pyarrow*.rpm. Updating to Arrow 19.0.0
ORC packages include liborc2*.rpm. Updating to ORC 2.1.0
side-tag f43-build-side-105129 has been created for rebuilding the
dependent packages:
* ceph (for which I am the maintai
Am 06.02.25 um 13:58 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
Hello,
just a short head-up:
I planning to builld NLopt-2.10.0 for Rawhide and F42 during later
today, which will bump its soname from libnlopt.so0 to libnlopt.so.1.
The following packages are affected:
* freefem++ (failed in COPR, but bu
The project[1] was originally used for FreeCAD which was retired due to
complicated dep issues and has no other dependents and is currently
FTBFS[3].
It has a fractured upstream[2] (I think I'm on my 3rd upstream) and the
current one has not made a release since 2022.
[1] https://src.fedoraprojec
On 2/6/25 2:50 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem,
basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early
filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easi
30 matches
Mail list logo
