On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:13 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
> Python <= 3.12 is still building the crypt module, which links
> libcrypt.so; thus those packages should express an explicit BR in libxcrypt.
I never bothered to follow all the details
of the issue, but is there not a problem
where l
I've retired tcl-signal. Nothing appears to require it in Fedora and it
appears to have been unchanged since 2012. I completely forgot about it
myself.
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boul
So, over at upstream they raised the suspicion that some parts of what
I'm linking are compiled with different flags. To recap: I get
```
/usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_vector.h:1262: std::vector<_Tp,
_Alloc>::reference std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator[](size_type)
[with _Tp = const char*; _Alloc =
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:22 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> So, over at upstream they raised the suspicion that some parts of what
> I'm linking are compiled with different flags. To recap: I get
> ```
> /usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_vector.h:1262: std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::reference std::vector<_Tp
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250203.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 09:18:56PM +0100, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
> Hi all,
> according to
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#submitter_not_responding
>
> "When the submitter of a review ticket has not responded to comments for one
> month, a comment is added t
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 23:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please
> > let me
> > know we have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
> >
> > Best regards,
On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 01:06 +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote:
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> finish and merge it before the mass branch which is scheduled for 4
> of
> Feb of 2025
Started
Building opencv-4.11.0-1.fc42 for f42-build-side-104797
Fa
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-02-04 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 1:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 02. 25 2:10, William Cohen wrote:
> > On 12/5/24 9:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 04. 12. 24 20:32, William Cohen wrote:
> >>> On 11/21/24 17:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 21. 11. 24 23:11, William Cohen wrote:
> > Sediment h
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250202.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250203.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:220.90
Hello Björn.
I just realized you pushed a commit like this to all Pythons < 3.13:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.12/c/14bc16980718d47128c25af68f33f1e249f0a36d?branch=rawhide
It says "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-devel" and it adds it and bump a release.
However, it does not explain w
On 03. 02. 25 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Why only for Python < 3.13?
I guess because the crypt module was removed from Python 3.13 and python3-libs
no longer Requires libcrypt.so.2()(64bit) + libcrypt.so.2(XCRYPT_2.0)(64bit).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
-
Hi
I've orphaned tcl-togl. It is currently FTBFS, would at some point
anyway need porting to tcl/tk 9, and nothing in Fedora currently uses
it. I packaged it at the time as a dependency for netgen-mesher, but
then switched to the modified copy netgen bundles.
Sandro
--
_
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/honggfuzz
I orphaned this one for a few reasons:
- FTBFS with GCC 15 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2340615)
- I don't use it. These days I recommend using AFL++ for fuzzing
(Fedora package: american-fuzzy-lop)
- Upstream is still twitchi
Hi All,
Fedora Linux 42 is going to be branched tomorrow as per the experience
of the previous release, we are going to disable the new koji builds
for the duration of this event. For more on this please refer to the
past discussion[1] In Fedora 41, we tried a new approach to block external
submis
Hello everyone,
Fedora CoreOS team reached to us to postpone the date of decommissioning
github2fedmsg and fedmsg in Fedora Infrastructure as they still need
some time to migrate.
I will still start working on this in our staging environment, but in
production the new date is 13th February.
On Monday, 03 February 2025 at 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Björn.
>
> I just realized you pushed a commit like this to all Pythons < 3.13:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.12/c/14bc16980718d47128c25af68f33f1e249f0a36d?branch=rawhide
>
> It says "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-de
Am 03.02.25 um 12:13 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Hello Björn.
Hi Miro.
I just realized you pushed a commit like this to all Pythons < 3.13:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.12/
c/14bc16980718d47128c25af68f33f1e249f0a36d?branch=rawhide
It says "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-devel" and it
Hi,
On 2/3/25 12:13 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Björn.
I just realized you pushed a commit like this to all Pythons < 3.13:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.12/
c/14bc16980718d47128c25af68f33f1e249f0a36d?branch=rawhide
It says "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-devel" and it adds it an
I'd like to plug
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/
for next time.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
21 matches
Mail list logo
