Re: Unretirement: tachyon

2025-01-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:20 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello! > > I want to unretire tachyon: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tachyon > > It was previously maintained by myself. I orphaned it when I thought I > had no users for it, but it turns out I need it again. > > Unre

Re: PQ [post-quantum] algorithms in Fedora 41 - improvements

2025-01-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Post quantum, I assume. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs,

Unretirement: tachyon

2025-01-17 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello! I want to unretire tachyon: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tachyon It was previously maintained by myself. I orphaned it when I thought I had no users for it, but it turns out I need it again. Unretirement review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338688 Regards, D

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Switch to EROFS for Live Media (self-contained)

2025-01-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM Phillip Lougher wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Thank you, I appreciate whatever you can do to make things better for > > our use-cases. :) > > Well it is obvious where your bias lies. Well, I appreciate your work too! Nowhere have I said you aren't doing good

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Switch to EROFS for Live Media (self-contained)

2025-01-17 Thread Gao Xiang
On 2025/1/17 17:40, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM Phillip Lougher wrote: Neal Gompa wrote: Thank you, I appreciate whatever you can do to make things better for our use-cases. :) Well it is obvious where your bias lies. Well, I appreciate your work too! Nowhere hav

PQ algorithms in Fedora 41 - improvements

2025-01-17 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear colleagues, I'd like to encourage you to test and upvote the following updates to Fedora 41: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-cc4e64ede9 This update adds the latest version of liboqs/oqsprovider packages and GnuTLS. This update provides the final NIST-approved versions of

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Switch to EROFS for Live Media (self-contained)

2025-01-17 Thread Phillip Lougher
Gao Xiang wrote: > On 2025/1/17 17:40, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM Phillip Lougher > > phillip.loug...@gmail.com wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > Thank you, I appreciate whatever you can do to make things better for > > our use-cases. :) > > Well it is obvious where your b

Re: forwarding aliases (was: Non-responsive maintainer sham1)

2025-01-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-16 23:30:34: > Note: we are talking about @fedoraproject.org aliases here. > mailing lists already mitigate this as you note. Indeed. One might wonder what fpo aliases are good for - after all, you have to have a mailbox to forward your alias to, and sendin

Re: rpmlint+readelf corrupted interpreter on generated binaries

2025-01-17 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Mark, But I also think this is a bug in binutils readelf (CCing nickc). It really should not even try to print the "interpreter" of a separate debuginfo file. Well yes and no. One of the main uses of readelf is to inspect potentially broken or corrupt ELF files, so displaying the contents

Re: rpmlint+readelf corrupted interpreter on generated binaries

2025-01-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Nick, On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:31:49AM +, Nick Clifton wrote: > >But I also think this is a bug in binutils readelf (CCing nickc). > > > >It really should not even try to print the "interpreter" of a separate > >debuginfo file. > > Well yes and no. One of the main uses of readelf is to