Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for huzaifas (Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala)

2024-09-12 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 5:29 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > > Done, > > Let me know if the new permissions work for you! Thank you, commit access is sufficient. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-09-10)

2024-09-12 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 12. 09. 24 v 1:00 Josh Boyer napsal(a): On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 3:49 PM Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 19:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > As I said, I have no option to *not* send it with wrapped lines ... > sorry about that. You can use real mail client

Re: Attempting to coordinate a lasem, goffice, gnumeric, abiword and gnome-chemistry-utils update for F41 and rawhide

2024-09-12 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Gwyn, I have built goffice and the builds of gnumeric are underway. All that's left for you is to rebuild abiword in the side tags. I will take care of the last in line and submit the updates. Best regards, A. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-09-10)

2024-09-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 4:50 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 12. 09. 24 v 1:00 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 3:49 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 19:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> > As I said, I have no option to *not* send it with wrapped lines

Re: Review Swap - some python, others

2024-09-12 Thread Neel Chauhan
On 2024-09-11 14:25, Neil Hanlon wrote: wyrd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269316 I've reviewed your wyrd package. It looks good. I'm happy to take any reviews from others in return. Please review my accel-ppp package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760

Re: Review Swap - some python, others

2024-09-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 02:25:17PM -0400, Neil Hanlon wrote: > tinyows - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307815 I took this one. Please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311104 in exchange. Zbyszek -- ___ devel mailing list -- d

[Test-Announce]REMINDER: Fedora Linux 41 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting Today

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
The Fedora Linux 41 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will take place today, Thursday 12th September @ 1700 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org[2]. At this time, we will determine the status of the F41 Beta release date [3] that is currently targeting Tuesday 17th September. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/

F42 Change Proposal: Integrate FEX in Fedora Linux (Self-Contained)

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FEX Discussion Post - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-integrate-fex-in-fedora-linux-self-contained/131147 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process,

F42 Change Proposal: Distributing Kickstart Files as OCI Artifacts (Self-Contained)

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KickstartOciArtifacts Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-distributing-kickstart-files-as-oci-artifacts-self-contained/131150 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Cha

Re: No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Howarth
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:45:59 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:33:49 +0200 > Petr Pisar wrote: > > > V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a): > > > Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s > > > failing with the aforementioned error (No

F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Web_UI_Partitioning Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/feedback-anaconda-web-ui-partitioning/108995 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process

F42 Change Proposal: PHP 8.4 (Self-Contained)

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php84 Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-php-8-2-self-contained/131153 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are pub

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Integrate FEX in Fedora Linux (Self-Contained)

2024-09-12 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 04:50:39PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:dcavalca|Davide Cavalca]], [[User:ngompa|Neal Gompa]], > [[User:alyssa|Alyssa Rosenzweig]] > * Responsible Teams: [[SIGs/Asahi|Asahi SIG]], [[SIGs/KDE|KDE SIG]] > * Email: davide(at)cavalca.name, ngompa13(

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)

2024-09-12 Thread Andre Robatino
I always clean install each new version of Fedora using the Workstation LIve, and preserve the data in /home. After reading this, I looked at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home and saw that it now specifically says not to use the Workstation Live o

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)

2024-09-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski via devel
On 9/12/24 12:12, Aoife Moloney wrote: Anaconda will replace root and should have a possibility to preserve /home with user data. This is great, but in a default setup /home is just a btrfs subvolume. Would this method be able to preserve /home while recreating the system part, in the 2-subvo

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Integrate FEX in Fedora Linux (Self-Contained)

2024-09-12 Thread Davide Cavalca
On 2024-09-12 09:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: This is describing what QEMU user emulators already provide for users, on any host arch. Perhaps acknowledge that QEMU user exists, and explain why users would prefer FEX vs QEMU, as I presume there are probably some noteworthy differences that matte

Post-Mozilla Fira font family

2024-09-12 Thread Mateus Rodrigues Costa
Hello all, So, as you guys might know Mozilla commissioned the development of the Fira fonts with the goal of using it for FirefoxOS (which is mostly dead nowadays unless you consider KaiOS). [1] However Mozilla abandoned development of Fira Sans on version 4.2, whereas bBox Type GmbH developed Fi

[Test-Announce]Fedora Linux 41 Beta Release is GO

2024-09-12 Thread Aoife Moloney
The Fedora Linux 41 Beta RC 1.2 compose is GO and will be shipped live on Tuesday, 17th September 2024. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1] or log[2]. [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-09-12/f41-beta-go-no-go.2024-09-12-17.0

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240912.n.0 changes

2024-09-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240912.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:6.35 MiB Size of

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)

2024-09-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:02 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > > On 9/12/24 12:12, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > Anaconda will replace root and should have a possibility to > > preserve /home with user data. > > This is great, but in a default setup /home is just a btrfs subvolume. > Would this m

Re: Post-Mozilla Fira font family

2024-09-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 9/12/24 1:37 PM, Mateus Rodrigues Costa wrote: I opened a bug report a while back asking for changing the upstream of the current Fira fonts from the mozilla upstream to the bBox Type one, although I haven't received any reply yet. [3] It happens. What can be done here? You could try con

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)

2024-09-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski via devel
On 9/12/24 16:52, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:02 PM Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 9/12/24 12:12, Aoife Moloney wrote: Anaconda will replace root and should have a possibility to preserve /home with user data. This is great, but in a default setup /home is just a btrfs subvolume.

[rpms/perl-Net-Server] PR #8: Only initialize existing Net::SSLeay methods (F41FTBFS)

2024-09-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
yselkowitz opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Server` that you are following: `` Only initialize existing Net::SSLeay methods (F41FTBFS) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Server/pull-request/8 -- _

[Bug 2312047] perl-SNMP-Info-3.972000 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312047 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2046637 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2046637&action=edit Update to 3.972000 (#2312047) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 2312047] New: perl-SNMP-Info-3.972000 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312047 Bug ID: 2312047 Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.972000 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-SNMP-Info Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2312047] perl-SNMP-Info-3.972000 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312047 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-SNMP-Info-3.972000-1.fc40.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123326039 -- You

[Bug 2309326] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.05 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309326 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-B

aarch64 glibc issue

2024-09-12 Thread Richard Shaw
I have a report[1] of an issue with wsjtx installing on aarch64 only: Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package wsjtx-2.7.0-3.fc40.aarch64 - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) needed by wsjtx-2.7.0-6.fc40.aarch64 from updates - nothing provides libmvec.so.1(GLIB

[Bug 2309324] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.55 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309324 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2309326] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.05 is available

2024-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309326 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.05-1.f |perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.05-1.f

Re: aarch64 glibc issue

2024-09-12 Thread Paul Grosu
Hi Richard, The quickest way is to try installing the wsjtx package with the additional --nobest argument on the command-line? For more information about what that argument does, below is a link: https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html The alternative is ensure you have a clean/up

Re: [Test-Announce]Fedora 41 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!

2024-09-12 Thread Luna Jernberg
Ah alright i see, thanks for the information, installing RC 1.2 now, been a bit too busy and sick Den ons 11 sep. 2024 kl 18:39 skrev Adam Williamson : > > On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > Testing at the moment, install of > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/4

Re: aarch64 glibc issue

2024-09-12 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:45:29 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > I have a report[1] of an issue with wsjtx installing on aarch64 only: > > Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package > wsjtx-2.7.0-3.fc40.aarch64 > - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) needed by > wsjtx-2.7