On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 03:40 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm not seeing a "Create Fedora 41 Beta Candidates" ticket at
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues - is there one?
No, in this case we just ran a compose with whatever was in the stable
tag in order to test out the new release candidate scri
Testing at the moment, install of
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/41/Fedora-41-20240910.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-41_Beta-1.1.iso
worked as it should, but it was not fully updated still 297 packages
to update with sudo dnf5 update
Den ons 11 sep. 20
Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 1:58 PM Simone Caronni wrote:
> Correct, as discussed with Neal who took the packages, I'm updating them
> to the latest snapshots which is what is included in driver 560.31.02.
> egl-gbm below the current snapshot makes Wayland not working with 560.
> The librarie
Can these reports not be wrapped to 80 lines or wrapped in a way the
wrapping respect the nesting? The wrapping makes them hard to read.
Thank for considering.
Vít
Dne 10. 09. 24 v 20:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
===
Hello,
according to the policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs
The abrt package will be retired one week before the Fedora 41 final freeze,
due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> according to the policy:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs
>
> The abrt package will be retired one week before the Fe
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > according to the policy:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:26 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Can these reports not be wrapped to 80 lines or wrapped in a way the
> wrapping respect the nesting? The wrapping makes them hard to read.
>
> Thank for considering.
I assume you mean 80 columns, not 80 lines?
In fact, the email as it was s
Dne 11. 09. 24 v 16:41 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:26 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Can these reports not be wrapped to 80 lines or wrapped in a way the
wrapping respect the nesting? The wrapping makes them hard to read.
Thank for considering.
I assume you mean 80 columns,
Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I guess I don’t understand what kind of
package this is, and who to contact to see what can be done; I’ve dealt
with regular package
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:26 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
>
> Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I guess I don’t understand what kind of
> package this is, and who to
V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a):
> Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I guess I don’t understand what kind of
> package this is, and w
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:33:49 +0200
Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a):
> > Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> > the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> > 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I
Thanks Petr!
On 11 Sep 2024, at 10:33, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a):
Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s
failing with
the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I guess
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:34 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> You want to contact xorg-x11-util-macros component owner.
xorg-x11-util-macros was in CRB in EL9, but is
no longer available in (future) EL10. The OP
will need to open a bugzilla to request an
EPEL10 branch and build for the package
by the pac
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Testing at the moment, install of
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/41/Fedora-41-20240910.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-41_Beta-1.1.iso
> worked as it should, but it was not fully updated still 29
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:09 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 11. 09. 24 v 16:41 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > Doing line-wrapping by hand instead of letting my mail client do this
> > would be a lot of work.
>
> I'd appreciate if *my* email client had a chance to do the work and wrap
> as / if ne
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-09-11/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-09-11-16.37.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-09-11/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-09-11-16.37.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedora
Hi folks -
I've got a few reviews that have been pending for various amounts of
time and at least one of just needs a brief "Approve", so should be
fairly easy to close out (pinnwand).
pinnwand - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229857
wyrd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 19:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> As I said, I have no option to *not* send it with wrapped lines ...
> sorry about that.
You can use real mail clients (Thunderbird, Evolution) with gmail and
they let you wrap your mails however you darn please. :D
--
Adam Williamson (he
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:45:38PM GMT, David Shea wrote:
> I tried raising this one from the dead last year, but changes in
> crypto-policy have made the use cases I cared about difficult-to-impossible,
> and I am no longer interested in maintaining this package. Upstream moved on
> from this p
Hi Huzaifa,
Now that we've established that I cannot ask for permission, could you
please add me as co-maintainer to goffice and gnumeric?
It would help lessen the work for Gwyn in preparing the tangled
updates, now and in the future.
Thank you in advance,
A.
--
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 3:49 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 19:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > As I said, I have no option to *not* send it with wrapped lines ...
> > sorry about that.
>
> You can use real mail clients (Thunderbird, Evolution) with gmail and
> they let you w
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240911.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 123
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 57.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 41 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
Done,
Let me know if the new permissions work for you!
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:37 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Huzaifa,
>
> Now that we've established that I cannot ask for permission, could you
> please add me as co-maintainer to goffice and gnumeric?
> It
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240911.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240912.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:25.65 MiB
Size of
27 matches
Mail list logo
