Package reviews

2024-09-07 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hello, I have three simple Fortran packages for review: mstore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310390 multicharge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310391 dftd4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310392 which are straightforward meson builds. multicharge depe

Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

2024-09-07 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH Classpath-exception-2.0 > is not allowed. Simply because it is not on Fedora list (while it is valid > SPDX formula). > Can you please file an issue for this combination at > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data The licensing situation for Lazarus is prett

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240907.n.0 changes

2024-09-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240906.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240907.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Something wrong with rawhide (41) keys?

2024-09-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:49:45PM GMT, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > $ rpm -q mock mock-core-configs distribution-gpg-keys > mock-5.6-1.fc40.noarch > mock-core-configs-40.6-1.fc40.noarch > distribution-gpg-keys-1.104-1.fc40.noarch > > The weird thing is that doing `dnf clean all; dnf update` right a