Hi folks,
I've orphaned python-gear and python-ws4py.
As suggested in [1] I propose this change [2] to retire python-fb-re2.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260410
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fb-re2/pull-request/2
--
___
On 3.09.2024 10:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
Thanks for pointing it out. Sorted out rpmfusion issues.
Two problems left:
Problem 1: package alizams-1.9.10-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
libITKCommon-4.13.so.1()(64bit), bu
Oh, wow. Big thanks, Kevin!
I relayed this info to the upstream developer, along
with an invitation to participate in this thread as to
avoid using me as an intermediary.
Thanks again!
Sincerely,
A.FI.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
It looks like most or all of these issues come from the third-party
signal-libringrtc package, which I think must have come from
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/x86_64/.
It would have to be rebuilt for Fedora 41. It doesn’t look like there is
a
https://
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 143
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.16 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
And the package has been retired in Rawhide, because RPM 4.20+ provides
its own implementation (and there should not be other users to my
knowledge):
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dependency_generators.html#using-file-attributes-in-their-own-package
The difference in use
I have frustrations with bugzilla, and please, if you can, try the following
sudo dnf/dnf5 install meld aisleriot
With every days F41 update the above crashes, and then...
dnf update (always fails to fetch updates)
Thanks in advance
Leslie Satenstein
On Wednesday, September 4, 2024
I'm working on packaging where one component is written in nodejs.
The Fedora packaging guidelines are pretty explicit that I should
be bundling all the 3rd party nodejs
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js
"You can provide a package that uses nodejs, but you shou
this patch solves the problem::
--- a/pyliblo3/_liblo.pyx
+++ b/pyliblo3/_liblo.pyx
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ cdef int _msg_callback(const_char *path, const_char *types,
lo_arg **argv,
elif t == 'm': v = (argv[i].m[0], argv[i].m[1], argv[i].m[2],
argv[i].m[3])
elif t == 't': v = _tim
On 04. 09. 24 16:35, Martin Gansser wrote:
this patch solves the problem::
--- a/pyliblo3/_liblo.pyx
+++ b/pyliblo3/_liblo.pyx
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ cdef int _msg_callback(const_char *path, const_char *types,
lo_arg **argv,
elif t == 'm': v = (argv[i].m[0], argv[i].m[1], argv[i].m[2],
Dear all,
in Gentoo Linux we want to change our CHOST triplets for 32-bit glibc systems
that use 64-bit time_t, since
this is technically an ABI change which breaks binary compatibility [1].
We are thinking of adding a "t64" suffix to the ABI field, resulting in for
example i686-pc-linux-gnut6
Once upon a time, Leo Sandoval said:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 2:16 PM Leo Sandoval wrote:
>
> > Hi Adam / Team
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:01 AM Adam Williamson <
> > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 07:46 -0600, Leo Sandoval wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > A
Grr, sorry for the empty reply, that's what I get for emailing while
sick.
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> > Netboot fixes are now integrated into rawhide, no official build yet just a
> > scratch one: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=122703223
I can confirm that netboot
Hi all,
Since we need the Django stack in EPEL for running the mailing list
infra, a few months ago the EPEL Steering Committee discussed a plan to
package Django LTS versions in EPEL, with RPM-based Provides/Conflicts
to allow swapping between different Django stacks
https://pagure.io/epel/issue
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:48:23PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> We thought the SIG might want to chime in on this (might as well sort it
> out before I start writing documentation anyway) - any pros/cons we have
> not thought up, and any recommendation about which is better overall?
OLD: Fedora-ELN-20240903.n.1
NEW: Fedora-ELN-20240904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:58 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:48:23PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > We thought the SIG might want to chime in on this (might as well sort it
> > out before I start writing documentation anyway) - any pros/cons we have
> > not t
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 12:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> And the package has been retired in Rawhide, because RPM 4.20+ provides
> its own implementation (and there should not be other users to my
> knowledge):
I just started using it, it saves me the trouble of bootstrapping a
package, and I was a
I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)[1].
This email is part of that process.
Besides the email in their FAS profile (here in CC), does anyone know how to
contact Fabian?
Fabia has not responded to a SIGSEGV issue on isync [2] for more than a month,
and roug
19 matches
Mail list logo
