On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 9:40 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > > I can't say I'm proud of this hack but at least, the error message
> > > shows up to give a clue. I can finally add some error handling to my
> > > dependency generators.
> >
> > Yes, currently the exit code is ignored, and the only w
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 5:31 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > I made the scripts end with something written to stderr followed by an
> > explicit "exit 1", and I can see the error message, but then it just
> > succeeds. So my question is how to make RPM register that a dependency
> > generator fai
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2775a88d84
lua-mpack-1.0.12-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
eccodes-2.36.0-1.el9
lazarus-2.2.6-2.el9
obj
Thank you both for the input. I guess I should patch
gnome-chemistry-utils regardless of what happens in glib.
Michael, if you still feel this should be reported upstream, there is
this bug in Debian Sid - our systems haven't filed an FTBFS bug yet:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Hello,
I was looking at the build logs of gnome-chemistry-utils in koschei
and it seems that a recent change in glib is the reason for the
package FTBFS:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/commit/c583162cc6d7078ff549c72615617092b0bc150a
I can sort of understand the rationale behind that, but
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
eccodes-2.36.0-1.el8
objfw-1.1.7-3.el8
Details about builds:
eccodes-2.36.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a0bc24a78f)
WMO data format decod
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240831.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240901.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
We should probably revert that. If you have a GNOME GitLab account,
feel free to create an issue report. Otherwise, I can do so.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
> > I can't say I'm proud of this hack but at least, the error message
> > shows up to give a clue. I can finally add some error handling to my
> > dependency generators.
>
> Yes, currently the exit code is ignored, and the only way to break the
> build is to generate a line that does not parse as
> I made the scripts end with something written to stderr followed by an
> explicit "exit 1", and I can see the error message, but then it just
> succeeds. So my question is how to make RPM register that a dependency
> generator failed and in turn fail the build?
I tried following the rpmdeps code
On 01/09/2024 23:26, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
I can sort of understand the rationale behind that, but I'd like
someone who is more actively involved with C++ to give some advice if
this is something I should be reporting to the glib folks, or if I
should just change the writable string pointe
Hi all,
I would like to ask the scientific package community for help in reviewing
optking, which is a new dependency of the Psi4 quantum chemistry package.
The current release of psi4 in Fedora is version 1.3.2 which dates back to four
years(!) ago. Unfortunately, the package's upstream made som
# F10 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-03 (**TUESDAY**)
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! As Monday
is a holiday in North America, let
(lib)tree-sitter 0.23.0 changed the SONAME from libtree-sitter.so.0 to
libtree-sitter.so.0.23. This was a deliberate change upstream[1].
While the stable updates were unpushed, this still landed in rawhide and
ELN. emacs has already been rebuilt, but neovim and rizin have not,
making them uni
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 10.0 updates-testing
libudfread-1.1.2-9.el10_0
perl-Data-Dumper-Names-0.03-41.el10_0
perl-Data-HexDump-0.04-7.el10_0
perl-Digest-MD4-1.9-41.el10_0
perl-Digest-Perl-MD5-1.9-28.el10_0
perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl-1.16-1.el10_0
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 10:42 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> Happy packaging!
>
I have noted that some dependencies for some
of my packages are (apparently) no longer
going to be shipped in EL10 (they were in
EL9).
Before I request the branches and builds
in EPEL10, I would like to make sure those
p
Hello everyone, I would like to become a package maintainer and I have my first
review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2301387. I
also have quite a few more packages that I would like to maintain(either for
Fedora or RPM Fusion), I have some of them(not all) on my githu
17 matches
Mail list logo
