On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:17 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Yes, the package "inchi" will end up with with LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust
> license. But right now it is not on fedora-license-data because the wording
> of the exception is missing. So right now the license will be recognized as
> inv
I am trying to build pyliblo3 from your repo on Fedora 41 with python 3.13.0.
I've got a build error during compilation:
# wget https://github.com/gesellkammer/pyliblo3/archive/refs/heads/master.zip
# unzip pyliblo3-master.zip; cd pyliblo3-master; ./setup build
root@fc41:/tmp/pyliblo3-master# ./s
* Peter Pentchev:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Lennart Poettering:
>> > You don't really have to live with such a limitation. In systemd we
>> > have code that works around this limitation via O_PATH. i.e. when
>> > connect()ing you first open the socket i
On Do, 22.08.24 17:06, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > You don't really have to live with such a limitation. In systemd we
> > have code that works around this limitation via O_PATH. i.e. when
> > connect()ing you first open the socket inode with O_PATH, and then you
> > fire the co
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 12:06:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Peter Pentchev:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Lennart Poettering:
> >> > You don't really have to live with such a limitation. In systemd we
> >> > have code that works around this li
the following patcch [3] fix_liblo3.patch should now working
[1]
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/pyliblo3-0.16.2-0.1.git91d1781.fc41.src.rpm
[2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/pyliblo3.spec
[3] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/fix_liblo3.patch
Regards
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 3:18 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages
> (golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm)
>
> https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-normal-diff.txt
>
> Shorten version without the context is here:
>
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 07:40 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> I am trying to build pyliblo3 from your repo on Fedora 41 with python 3.13.0.
> I've got a build error during compilation:
>
> # wget https://github.com/gesellkammer/pyliblo3/archive/refs/heads/master.zip
> # unzip pyliblo3-master.zip; cd
Hi,
isn't there a problem with rpminspect-data-fedora used in the bodhi
automated tests? My recent build of s390utils failed on stuff that was
no problem 2 weeks ago. Does rpminspect-data-fedora need branching?
See eg. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-bb726e3bd3
and https://bod
On 8/26/24 12:23, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi,
isn't there a problem with rpminspect-data-fedora used in the bodhi
automated tests? My recent build of s390utils failed on stuff that was
no problem 2 weeks ago. Does rpminspect-data-fedora need branching?
See eg. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
Add to the following, "Aisleriot" and "Meld"
I definitely need "Meld".
Leslie Satenstein
On Monday, August 26, 2024 at 12:22:18 p.m. EDT, Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 07:40 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> I am trying to build pyliblo3 from your repo on Fedora 41
Version 3.34 of libsvm has been released, and bumps the soname of the
library. I would like to update libsvm and rebuild the consuming
packages:
- clisp
- openms
- perl-Algorithm-SVM
I maintain clisp. The other maintainers are BCCed on this message. I
will do these builds in Rawhide sometime ne
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:13 AM Martin Gansser
wrote:
>
> the following patcch [3] fix_liblo3.patch should now working
>
> [1]
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/pyliblo3-0.16.2-0.1.git91d1781.fc41.src.rpm
> [2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/pyliblo3.spec
> [3] htt
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240826.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-41-20240824.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240826.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 141
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 883.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:75.30 MiB
In one week, 2024-09-02, I plan to update the usd package from 24.03 to
24.08[1] in F42/Rawhide and F41/Branched (where it will not reach the
repositories until the end of the Beta Freeze). As always, this is an
ABI-incompatible update with an SONAME version bump.
The sole dependent package is
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:05:55AM -0500, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:
> Report started at 2024-08-03 14:00:44 UTC
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, pl
Dne 26. 08. 24 v 8:50 odp. David Cantrell napsal(a):
Probably. A lot of the data files are mapped from the dist tag. Any time a new dist tag is created, that is not
automatically created in rpminspect-data-fedora. The owner of the data has to do that. That's been entirely manual on
my part so
18 matches
Mail list logo
