Thanks for the heads up (!)... and sorry for the unannounced bump.
I totally overlooked that this package had so many dependencies, direct or
indirect.
As you have suggested on another channel, I feel it is the moment for me to
handover the ownership of that package to anyone having more time to t
Dne 13. 08. 24 v 19:20 Link Dupont napsal(a):
Hello,
I noticed that the up-and-coming meson-compliant build tool muon[1] is not currently
available in Fedora. While searching around, I found that a dist-git repository[2] titled
"muon" already exists, and used to contain a KDE Plasma utility.
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240814.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:59:56PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:21 AM Link Dupont wrote:
> > I noticed that the up-and-coming meson-compliant build tool muon[1] is not
> > currently available in Fedora. While searching around, I found that a
> > dist-git repository[2] t
V Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 08:35:18PM +0200, Marcus Müller napsal(a):
>
> To make that a bit sweeter: Try `dnf5 install gnuradio-companion`. It will
> ask you to install the `gnuradio` package. I honestly don't know why
Because "dnf5 install" also searches arguments for files in /usr/bin and
/usr/sbi
Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
F42 and F41, which will unblock many of the other packages that need to
be rebuilt.
To do so, I added a BuildRequires on openssl-devel-engine[1] as a
sh
Hi!
I've got a question regarding
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToDnf5#Background_service_support :
> A new daemonized service, dnf5daemon, utilizing the D-Bus interface, is prepared for
clients as a sub-package. This will serve as an alternative or replacement for the
Package
On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
F42 and F41, which will unblock many of the other packages that need to
be rebuilt.
To do so, I added a BuildReq
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:30 AM Marcus Müller wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've got a question regarding
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToDnf5#Background_service_support
> :
>
> > A new daemonized service, dnf5daemon, utilizing the D-Bus interface, is
> prepared for
> clients as a sub-pa
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:30:09 +0200
Sandro via devel wrote:
> On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
> > here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
> > F42 and F41, which will unblock many of t
V Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 04:30:09PM +0200, Sandro via devel napsal(a):
> However, I'm not sure the re2 update is compatible with other dependent
> packages. My smoke test, yesterday, already showed some packages fail to
> build with libre2.so.11, while they do succeed with libre2.so.9. Packages
> kno
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 04:30:09PM GMT, Sandro via devel wrote:
> On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
> > here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
> > F42 and F41, which will unblock many of
Hello,
Not really here to defend the current setting. But I have run with it set to
1 for several years and have not noticed any real issues.
-Steve
On Monday, August 12, 2024 10:27:18 AM EDT pgnd wrote:
> in
>
> distro
> Name: Fedora Linux 40 (Forty)
> Versi
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-08-14/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-08-14-16.33.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-08-14/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-08-14-16.33.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedorapr
On 14-08-2024 16:45, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:30:09 +0200
Sandro via devel wrote:
On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
F42 and F41, wh
On 14-08-2024 18:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 04:30:09PM GMT, Sandro via devel wrote:
On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
F42 and F4
Some of you have probably noticed that Koji is a bit overloaded at the
moment. Well, that's my fault. Sorry about that. I'm writing up a
post-mortem on how it happened so we can all learn from my mistakes.
This time around, we coordinated with releng to update the Rawhide tag
we trigger on as part
Thanks Neal! this is great news to me :)
On 14.08.24 16:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:30 AM Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi!
I've got a question regarding
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToDnf5#Background_service_support :
> A new daemonized service, dnf5daemon, uti
On 14-08-2024 09:37, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Thanks for the heads up (!)... and sorry for the unannounced bump.
I totally overlooked that this package had so many dependencies, direct or
indirect.
As you have suggested on another channel, I feel it is the moment for me to
handover the ownership of t
On 14-08-2024 22:40, Sandro wrote:
On 14-08-2024 09:37, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Thanks for the heads up (!)... and sorry for the unannounced bump.
I totally overlooked that this package had so many dependencies,
direct or
indirect.
As you have suggested on another channel, I feel it is the moment
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:21 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently, pam_radius released a new version and with it changed the location
> of the config file everywhere, giving us the opportunity to align with
> upstream and remove all our downstream-only patches.
>
> During the package upda
Hello,
On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 1:44:17 PM EDT pgnd wrote:
> > Not really here to defend the current setting. But I have run with it set
> > to 1 for several years and have not noticed any real issues.
>
> understood.
>
> and that's been my _personal_ experience as well. it's been necessary
On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 7:59:49 PM EDT pgnd wrote:
> > ...
> > Changing one setting isn't a lockdown. But if you're wondering about the
> > nature of the apparent difference, it's really just one is a strategy to
> > mitigate a comprehensive threat model vs defaults settings that are
> > easi
On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 10:26:29 PM EDT pgnd wrote:
> > It not an analysis; it's a confession. I'm probably the person most
> > closely connected to this.
>
> heh
>
> it'd be useful to have the default switched to =1 _and_ have the "the sky
> will fall!" comments docs changed, or at least
24 matches
Mail list logo
