On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Sérgio Basto:
>
> > BTW and regarding this topic, should we start avoid build with golden
> > linker ? i.e for example, qt5-qtwebengine [2] should we add
> > BuildRequires: binutils-gold or should we try built with other linker
> > (ldd
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240802.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240803.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 182
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 30.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 8:31 AM Cristian Le via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 2024/08/01 17:27, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, if you have a general package that's shipped in every buildroot
>> for flatpak builds, you can
Report started at 2024-08-03 14:00:44 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
On 8/3/24 10:05 AM, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:
Report started at 2024-08-03 14:00:44 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them.
The packages listed as orphaned for 6 weeks have already been retired in
distgit but
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:13:52AM GMT, Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On 8/3/24 10:05 AM, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:
> > Report started at 2024-08-03 14:00:44 UTC
> >
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them.
>
> The pack
Hi
mingw-vulkan-tools grew a dependency on vulkan-volk, which I've prepared
for review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302650
It is a trivial cmake project which produces a single static library.
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
--
_
Hi Philip,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 03:54:03PM +1000, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
> So the SIG will have its own mailing list?
>
It will - we'll need it for having a FAS group anyway, and on the kernel
side the Btrfs developers are mostly used to mailing lists.
> Thanks for all the work!
Tha
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 04:38:56PM -0700, l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for taking the initiative. Btrfs is a welcome filesystem easier to
> manage due to its logical process compared to the old ext4/LVM combination.
> For my personal view, Brtfs is indeed a filesystem for Linux e
