Hi all,
Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed
that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to
"FedoraWorkstation". This zone has ports 1025-65535 open by default
[0]. Is there a historical reason for this, just an oversight, or am I
missing som
Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
> I often run dev servers that I assume
> are secure due to the default firewall settings
This practice of blindly assuming that somebody else is protecting you
from your own negligence is a common source of security breaches.
Björn Persson
pgpyeh70G061F.pgp
Descri
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 10:25 +0200, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed
> that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to
> "FedoraWorkstation". This zone has ports 1025-65535 open by default
> [0]. Is
On 28/07/2024 11:20, Björn Persson wrote:
Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
I often run dev servers that I assume
are secure due to the default firewall settings
This practice of blindly assuming that somebody else is protecting you
from your own negligence is a common source of security breaches.
On 28/07/2024 11:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 10:25 +0200, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed
that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to
"FedoraWorkstation". This zone has ports 1025
On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel
wrote:
Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I
believe
it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict
enough to not open all ports above 1024... That being said, it's an
example, a
On 28/07/2024 13:20, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel
wrote:
Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I believe
it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict
enough to not open all ports abo
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:49:51PM GMT, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
> Sure. But why do those ports need to be open by default at all? What is
> the benefit of adding those extra 2 lines? Does it enhance user
> friendliness? I doubt it, as users will still need to open ports for
> e.g. slp or md
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 8:40 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:49:51PM GMT, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
> > Sure. But why do those ports need to be open by default at all? What is
> > the benefit of adding those extra 2 lines? Does it enhance user
> > friendliness? I doubt i
Am 28.07.24 um 16:36 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 8:40 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:49:51PM GMT, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
Sure. But why do those ports need to be open by default at all? What is
the benefit of adding those extra 2 lines? Does it enhanc
Am 28.07.24 um 13:20 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel
wrote:
Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I believe
it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict
enough to not open all ports a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240727.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240728.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 65.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Am 28.07.24 um 13:20 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel
wrote:
Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I believe
it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict
enough to not open all ports a
On 7/28/24 3:49 AM, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
On 28/07/2024 11:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 10:25 +0200, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed
that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is se
Hey Folks!
We will be testing Fedora 41 with the new update in Podman 5.2.
To ensure a smooth transition, the Podman team and the Quality team of
Fedora have decided to host a test day[1]. The idea is for users to
test Podman 5.2 on a Fedora Rawhide machine and submit results in the
Test Day App[2
15 matches
Mail list logo
