On 02/07/2024 20:21, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
But it's a library that applications will link to, so this won't work.
The apps should dlopen() it and if this library is not installed they
will be able to disable all telemetry functionality.
dlopen is the best option for this.
--
Sincerely,
V Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:50:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:21:40PM GMT, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> > > Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org
> > > For more information, including information on
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:32:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.07.24 um 4:44 PM schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> >On Tue, Jul 2 2024 at 04:05:11 PM +02:00:00, Ralf Corsépius
> > wrote:
> >>Is this the same cheat as with Fedora's "installation ids" and Firefox's
> >>"phone home" features?
Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
back?
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
Unfortunately no %check section for this one yet.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2294403 - erla
FYI, builds with Boost Asio can be fixed by adding:
%global _preprocessor_defines %{_preprocessor_defines} -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE
Iñaki
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 14:15, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 14:07, Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> What will happen next week:
>
> 0. I'll create a side tag for the builds described below.
Where are we in this process? Has the side tag been created? Do builds
for testing already exist?
Thanks,
Florian
--
___
deve
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
> packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
> back?
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
> Unfortunately no %
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:53 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:32:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 02.07.24 um 4:44 PM schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> > >On Tue, Jul 2 2024 at 04:05:11 PM +02:00:00, Ralf Corsépius
> > > wrote:
> > >>Is this the same cheat as w
>
> > Country where device is physically located (this will need discussion)
I think I would be more interested in locale info than country.
Jens
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:39:04AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:53 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:32:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 02.07.24 um 4:44 PM schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
> > > >On Tue, Jul 2 2024 at 04:05:11 P
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:30 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:39:04AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:53 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:32:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am 02.07.24 um
Dne 02. 07. 24 v 13:49 Neal Becker napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:59 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 07. 24 v 22:58 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnprivilegedSystemFlatpakManagement
> Discussion thread -
>
https://discus
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:09:39PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > What will happen next week:
> >
> > 0. I'll create a side tag for the builds described below.
>
> Where are we in this process? Has the side tag been created? Do builds
> for testing already e
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 9:17 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 07. 24 v 13:49 Neal Becker napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:59 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dne 01. 07. 24 v 22:58 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
>> > Wiki -
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnprivilegedSystemFlatp
Dne 03. 07. 24 v 15:25 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 9:17 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 07. 24 v 13:49 Neal Becker napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:59 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 07. 24 v 22:58 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/
On Wed, Jul 3 2024 at 09:32:45 AM +02:00:00, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
The apps should dlopen() it and if this library is not installed they
will be able to disable all telemetry functionality.
dlopen is the best option for this.
It's possible, but that's annoying. There is really no
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:52 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> The system which I was dealing with is older and upgraded to more recent
> Fedora. But if I remember correctly, the Flatpack runtimes were part of
> the reason why it was for a while stuck with older Fedora version,
> because the runtimes consu
As many of you know, as packages change, so do their BuildRequires. In
the current state, maintaining them requires some manual work from the
maintainer.
1. So I got around the idea of a simple tool that checks file accesses
during the build and using RPM queries, detects whether some package'
I got bit on an EPEL 8 system by upgrading munin-node and losing
networking to my podman containers. I started digging and found that
munin uses the %firewalld_reload macro in %post. Then I dug a little
more and found that there's a number of packages that use that macro.
That's a bad idea IMHO
On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 18:02 +0200, Marián Konček wrote:
> > As many of you know, as packages change, so do their BuildRequires.
> > In
> > the current state, maintaining them requires some manual work from
> > the
> > maintainer.
> >
> > 1. So I got around the idea of a simple tool that checks f
Dne 03. 07. 24 v 6:02 odp. Marián Konček napsal(a):
As many of you know, as packages change, so do their BuildRequires. In the current state, maintaining them requires
some manual work from the maintainer.
1. So I got around the idea of a simple tool that checks file accesses during the build a
smesh has not been updated to build with OpenCascade 7.8.x and upstream
appears dead.
Since nothing in Fedora requires smesh with FreeCAD already being retired I
plan to retire smesh as well.
Let me know if you want the package.
Thanks,
Richard
--
___
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:20 AM Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the opportunity. I'll review a few of your
> packages. Could you please pick any of these ones and review them
> back?
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2293369 - erlang-gun (a HTTP client).
> Unfortunately no %check secti
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:22 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I can do one or both of these OCaml packages if Peter doesn't take
> them. Just assign them to me in BZ.
Thank you, Rich, but Peter did review them. I have started the builds
in f41-build-side-92005.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 07:01:05AM GMT, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 02.07.2024 um 23:50 schrieb Kevin Fenzi :
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:21:40PM GMT, Chris Adams wrote:
> >> Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> >>> Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.o
On 03/07/2024 22.15, Richard Shaw wrote:
> smesh has not been updated to build with OpenCascade 7.8.x and upstream
> appears dead.
>
> Since nothing in Fedora requires smesh with FreeCAD already being
> retired I plan to retire smesh as well.
>
> Let me know if you want the package.
I will take i
Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2024 06:15:04 CEST schrieb Aleksei Bavshin:
All the prep work has been finished and the side-tag is ready.
Please, rebuild your packages with 'fedpkg build
--target=f41-build-side-91835'.
I have rebuilt kwin and kwin-x11 in the above side tag.
Kevin Kofler
--
_
Hot news:
* Discussion about trivial conversion did not have consensus. I opened FESCO
ticket https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3230
* Scancode-toolkit is present in Fedora 40 too. If you want to play with it - here is the command line that gives *me*
the best result:
scancode --license --licen
28 matches
Mail list logo
