On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
As I recall from a previous query, there are
(around) 90 active proven packagers (and
~250 total who were in the PP group).
I think most privacy/security focused developers/maintainers won't plug
USB tokens they get from random people on the Internet
Hi everyone!
I'm a maintainer of xmlsec library.
The xmlsec library has a plugin system that implements the actual crypto
operation. Those implementations/plugins are provided as xmlsec
subpackages.
As Fedora is moving away from gcrypt, I will deprecate and stop shipping
xmlsec1-gcrypt. Unfortun
Hi all,
There were some minor license changes and / or corrections in recently
updated packages for Rust crates:
- databake / databake-derive: corrected from Unicode-DFS-2016 to Unicode-3.0
- enum-iterator / enum-iterator-derive: relicensed from MIT to 0BSD by upstream
The databake crate is a bu
Please note that the MEETING HAS BEEN MOVED 22 h later.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
d
Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we kee
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/06/24 07:15, zebo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>
> This is still in progress in f41-build-side-91095
>
> ```todotxt sort:priority:desc sort:status:asc
> x calligra
> x darktable
> digikam
> x exiv2
> geeqie
> gegl04
> x gerbera
>
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So what is t
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 12:10 Dan Horák napsal(a):
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240624.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240625.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 139
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 10.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 21. 06. 24 8:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
What I can do is to put a comment above the license:
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
License: GPL-2.0-only
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there
Am 24.06.24 um 22:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 21:09 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Am 24.06.24 um 20:14 schrieb Tom Hughes via devel:
On 24/06/2024 18:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Not really an issue if you have GSSAPI set up on your system. Such as
by installing fedora
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:48 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > As I recall from a previous query, there are
> > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and
> > ~250 total who were in the PP group).
>
> I think most privacy/security focused develope
On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out
malicious devices.
Who can guarantee that these device
On Аўт, 25 чэр 2024, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out
ma
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 16:21 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
> > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
> > form of legally-binding assertion that
Planned Outage - mailman - 2024-06-27 10:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-06-27 10:00 UTC
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-06-27 10:00UTC'
Reason fo
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
> > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
> > form of legally-binding assertion that
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:22 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> I would prefer this one since I can use open source applications to
> generate these codes. I can't find any FIDO2 implementations that are
> completely open source which doesn't require proprietary technologies
> like TPM or SGX.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:47:34AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > As I recall from a previous query, there are
> > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and
> > ~250 total who were in the PP group).
>
> I think most privacy/security focused
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-25/fesco.2024-06-25-17.01.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-25/fesco.2024-06-25-17.01.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:34:38AM GMT, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Пан, 24 чэр 2024, Gordon Messmer wrote:
...snip...
> > Is this work interesting? Should I continue working on it?
>
> Yes, it is definitely an interesting test. Thank you for investing your
> time and resources into this.
Yes,
HI,
Development has effectively ended. For years Red Hat drove development for
its RHGS product, but with the EOL of RHGS at the end of 2024 [1], and the
disbanding of RHGS engineering at Red Hat, no development is being done.
The last update (11.1) was on 6 Nov., 2023. Little or no, development i
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
License: GPL-2.0-only
We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 41 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-07-30.
Policy:
> *nod* would you mind add clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey to Fedora? Then I can simply
> call it.
Here's a package review request for it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294337
--
Peter Oliver
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
License: GPL-2.0-only
We (the Change own
26. kesäkuuta 2024 2.20.19 GMT+03:00 "Miro Hrončok"
kirjoitti:
>On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>>>
>>> Could you make the comment something like this?
>>>
>>> # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
>>> # TODO chec
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >> Could you make the comment something like this?
> >>
> >> # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
> >> # TODO check if th
28 matches
Mail list logo
