Rawhide binutils recently gained DT_RELR (packed relative relocation)
support on aarch64 as well, so redhat-rpm-config-293-1.fc41 enables it
there as well. The only architecture missing is now s390x.
I built a few thousand packages with this change and the most recent
binutils, and did not see an
Hello,
Perl 5.40 was released on June 9 2024 and Perl 5.40 change was approved
by FESCo [1].
I have required `f41-perl' build-root for this purpose [2] and it was
created.
I will start the rebuild later today or tomorrow morning and you can be
notified via mail about commits/builds in next days
Hot news:
SPDX released new license list https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.24.0 with 25 new licenses. Lot
of them are there because of Fedora maintainers. Thank you.
Two weeks ago we had:
* 24034spec files in Fedora
* 30706license tags in all spec files
* 10497 tag
Hi Vitaly,
> On 9. Jun 2024, at 09:15, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>
> On 08/06/2024 00:43, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> OpenSSL will no longer trust cryptographic signatures using SHA-1 by
>> default, starting from Fedora 41.
>
> What about Git? AFAIK, AFAIK, Git heavily uses both SHA-1 and
Hi Björn,
> On 9. Jun 2024, at 00:37, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Validating DNS resolvers are still required to be able to validate
> signatures made with SHA-1. RFC 8624 is still current as far as I can
> tell:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624#section-3.1
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/
I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken and
what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have very
vague understanding what is difference between "signatures" and
"hashing" or other purposes SHA1 can be used for.
Vít
Dne 08. 06. 24 v 0:43 Aoife Molo
Here's my 300-word attempt at it.
Hashing a piece of input data maps it
to a fixed-size output (20 bytes in case of SHA-1).
Cryptographic hash functions need to satisfy several more properties,
and the one we're concerned with is collision resistance,
i.e. computational infeasibility of finding an
On 5/31/24 01:55, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hello,
To deliver Python 3.13 with Fedora Linux 41, we will run a coordinated rebuild
in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.13
Python 3.13.0b2 is scheduled for Tuesday, Jun 4th 2024.
We hope to start the mass rebuild shortly afte
On 10. 06. 24 15:07, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 5/31/24 01:55, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hello,
To deliver Python 3.13 with Fedora Linux 41, we will run a coordinated
rebuild in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.13
Python 3.13.0b2 is scheduled for Tuesday, Jun 4th 2024.
We
On 6/10/24 06:12, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 24 15:07, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 5/31/24 01:55, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hello,
To deliver Python 3.13 with Fedora Linux 41, we will run a coordinated rebuild
in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.13
Python 3.13.0b2 is sc
Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
Source: macros.vlc
And this file defines macros that are loaded by rpmbuild during buildtime and
are used in the SPEC file.
This makes parsing of the SPEC file harder, because any parser have to have this maro file in
Dne 09. 06. 24 v 16:12 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
I was just thinking... for users with a limited upload bandwidth it is a
pain to upload big sources to the lookaside cache. What about
implementing a way to avoid the chain "user downloads the source -> user
upload the source to lookaside
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
>
> Source: macros.vlc
>
> And this file defines macros that are loaded by rpmbuild during buildtime and
> are used in the SPEC file.
>
> This makes pars
Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
Source: macros.vlc
And this file defines macros that are loaded by rpmbuild during buildtime and
ar
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:56:01PM GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> yeah, I've seen this pattern before, but it's not a great way to do
> things. ;(
>
> Probibly filing a bug is a good idea.
>
> It looks like there's only 2 packages using the old soname.
David, have you had a chance to file the bug? We w
If you do not mind, I did a bit of touch-up to the opening paragraphs.
A hashing function takes as input, a piece of input data, and maps it
to a fixed-size output (20 bytes in case of SHA-1).
Cryptographic hash functions need to satisfy several more properties,
and the one we are concerned with
Hello,
The Python 3.13 rebuild is in progress. We plan to merge the side tag soon.
So far, we've successfully built 3528 out of 4109 source packages, with
581 remaining to be built.
See the list of packages sorted by maintainers at the end of this mail.
If your package fails because there is
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
> > >
> > > Source: macros.vlc
> > >
>
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
>
> Source: macros.vlc
>
> And this file defines macros that are loaded by rpmbuild during buildtime and
> are used in the SPEC file.
>
> This ma
Dne 10. 06. 24 v 17:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files in Fedora use this syntax:
So
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:35:36AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > Lately, I noticed that several SPEC files i
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 18:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 06. 24 v 17:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:18:14PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
On 6/10/24 06:27, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 6/10/24 06:12, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 24 15:07, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 5/31/24 01:55, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hello,
To deliver Python 3.13 with Fedora Linux 41, we will run a coordinated rebuild
in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ch
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken
> and what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have
> very vague understanding what is difference between "signatures" and
> "hashing" or other purpos
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:09:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 18:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 06. 24 v 17:35 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > Dne 10. 06. 24 v 16:24 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> >
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:16 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken
> > and what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have
> > very vague understanding wh
Hi,
> On 10. Jun 2024, at 20:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken
>> and what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have
>> very vague understanding wh
Worth a bit of wide distribution as I'm sure I'm not the only one who got
burned:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291191
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:49 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Worth a bit of wide distribution as I'm sure I'm not the only one who got
> burned:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291191
The build of Julia that has this has been unpushed from
f40-updates-testing already:
https://bodhi.fe
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:49 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > Worth a bit of wide distribution as I'm sure I'm not the only one who got
> > burned:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291191
>
> The build of Julia that has th
There is nothing on the agenda for the meeting today so the meeting is
cancelled.
Zbyszek
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 20:57 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 8:49 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> > >
> > > Worth a bit of wide distribution as I'm sure I'm not the only one who got
> > > burned:
> > > https://bugz
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:56 +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> As this change does not affect the resulting binary packages an
> immediate rebuild is not needed. The change will "only" ensure the
> packages still build with the new version of RPM.
I think you should rebuild the packages because at the
Sorry for the silence. I've been on vacation, returning to find a
giant pile of work waiting for me. :-)
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Since flocq seems to have no public bug tracker, I might as well write
> my findings here ...
>
> I believe the error is raised in
Hello everyone,
Openvdb got rebuild to use tbb2020.3 as requirement addressing an issue
where Blender would fail due to incompatibility with the latest stable
tbb 2021.
The following packages should remain unaffected by this change:
- OpenImageIO
- luxcorerender
- openvkl
- prusa-slicer
- usd
> Am 10.06.2024 um 20:16 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones :
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I wish this proposal included some examples of what might get broken
>> and what will keep working. I guess I am not the only one who have
>> very vague understanding what is
36 matches
Mail list logo
