Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240529.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240528.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240529.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
GenericError: srpm mismatch for
/mnt/koji/work/tasks/4737/118234737/ocaml-ocamldoc-debuginfo-5.2.0-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm:
(none) (expected ocaml-5.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm)
I have just n
On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
GenericError: srpm mismatch for
/mnt/koji/work/tasks/4737/118234737/ocaml-ocamldoc-debuginfo-5.2.0-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm:
(none) (ex
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
> >
> >It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
> >
> >GenericError: srpm mismatch for
> >/mnt/koji/work
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
> >
> >It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
> >
> >GenericError: srpm mismatch for
> >/mnt/koji/work
Hi there
mupdf 1.24.x release branch received another mostly bugfix release
which bumped soname nonetheless. Fixes are confirmed good to go for
rawhide and F40.
I built mupdf in a side-tag, will rebuild dependencies myself or via
PRs (qpdfview).
Note: Since this necessitates a rebuild of zathura
On 29. 05. 24 13:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
GenericError: srpm
On 5/29/24 14:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 05. 24 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118234666
It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
GenericError: srpm mis
Folks, rpm 4.20 alpha landed in rawhide today, and with the sheer amount
of change that went into the bowels of the build code, this process is
being rougher than usual. Apologies for the disruption and the late
heads-up.
Please file bugs with low bar to entry if you suspect an rpmbuild
reg
On Wed, May 29, 2024 14:04:20 GMT, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Hi there
Hi Michael,
> mupdf 1.24.x release branch received another mostly bugfix release
> which bumped soname nonetheless. Fixes are confirmed good to go for
> rawhide and F40.
>
> I built mupdf in a side-tag, will rebuild dependenci
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
>
> GenericError: srpm mismatch for
> /mnt/koji/work/tasks/4737/118234737/ocaml-ocamldoc-debuginfo-5.2.0-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm:
> (none) (expected ocaml-5.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm)
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It failed right at the end with this mysterious error:
> >
> > GenericError: srpm mismatch for
> > /mnt/koji/work/tasks/4737/118234737/ocaml-ocamldoc-debuginf
Andrea (in CC) recently pointed me to libtiff installation warnings on
Fedora/RISCV side:
[..]
Installing : libtiff-4.6.0-2.fc40.riscv64 5/5
Running scriptlet: libtiff-4.6.0-2.fc40.riscv64 5/5
/usr/sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/lp64d/libtiffxx.
Dne 29. 05. 24 v 2:31 odp. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
Folks, rpm 4.20 alpha landed in rawhide today
4.19.91 == 4.20 alpha?
Because I do not see 4.20 in Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=319
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedor
On 5/29/24 18:09, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 29. 05. 24 v 2:31 odp. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
Folks, rpm 4.20 alpha landed in rawhide today
4.19.91 == 4.20 alpha?
Because I do not see 4.20 in Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=319
Yes, that's the one. cmake d
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:38:59PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Do you plan to submit rebuilds for the failed packages are should
> packagers do that individually?
Yes, I just went through the failed builds from today and restarted those that
were "almost" successful (i.e. were actu
tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20
and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will
continue to maintain libuv.
It's been a hard decision to come to, but I think this is the correct
decision for me. I've been effectively the sole maintainer of No
On 27/05/2024 13:04, Bob Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
This week, I will rebuild svt-av1 and its dependencies in a side tag.
Tests were done this weekend on COPR and compatibility with FFmpeg
6.1.1 was determined to be functional.
I will need the help from RPM fusion people.
Libheif and Libheif-f
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:27:18PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> I might have missed some so apologies to those folks, please resubmit them at
> your discretion.
Just a note:
For one, I skipped over those build that were done against a side tag, to avoid
messing up somebody's work-in-progress.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-29/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-05-29-16.32.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-29/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-05-29-16.32.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedo
About three years ago, I picked up the grpc package after it was
orphaned. I put quite a bit of work into it – migrating from autotools
to CMake, enabling tests, and packaging the latest version – and I kept
it up to date for a while, until further updates were blocked by the
need for a major p
yeah, I've seen this pattern before, but it's not a great way to do
things. ;(
Probibly filing a bug is a good idea.
It looks like there's only 2 packages using the old soname.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list
The OCaml 5.2 build is ongoing.
flocq FTBFS on ppc64le (only) with a stack overflow:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2458620
I tried increasing the stack size in case it was just marginal, but to
no effect.
I have reserved a ppc64le system so I can take a look at this
to
24 matches
Mail list logo
