Re: Intention to retire mlocate

Christopher wrote on Fri, May 24, 2024 at 02:15:17AM -0400: > A flag to treat the arguments as OR like mlocate did instead of the default > to AND would be great, though I wish plocate would have more closely > mimicked mlocate's default behavior from the beginning and had a flag for > AND instead.

Re: Personal introduction // Interested in adopting orphans

On 24-05-2024 07:11, Paul Pfeister via devel wrote: Last Thursday, an inactive packagers list was sent out on devel with a list of now-orphaned packages. Among these are python-git-changelog and python-pyzabbix

Re: small logic issue with system upgrades

On 5/22/24 16:33, Marius Schwarz wrote: So, atm, the server has a sshd that says, that openssl is newer as the required openssl version. It does not start it nor can the running sshd, that runs the upgrade connection, fork a new instance. In other words: no login possible to rescue or recover

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240524.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240523.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240524.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 82 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 16.33 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Changing desktop file name in a stable release

Hi list, are there guidelines advising how to handle upstream desktop filename change in a stable fedora release? For gnumeric I just followed upstream [1], which led to a bug report [2]. Now I am facing similar situation with pavucontrol [3]. Should I rename the desktop file to what it used

Re: small logic issue with system upgrades

Am 24.05.24 um 12:01 schrieb Roberto Ragusa: On 5/22/24 16:33, Marius Schwarz wrote: So, atm, the server has a sshd that says, that openssl is newer as the required openssl version. It does not start it nor can the running sshd, that runs the upgrade connection, fork a new instance. In other

Re: Changing desktop file name in a stable release

Julian Sikorski wrote: > are there guidelines advising how to handle upstream desktop filename > change in a stable fedora release? For gnumeric I just followed upstream > [1], which led to a bug report [2]. Now I am facing similar situation > with pavucontrol [3]. Should I rename the desktop file

Re: Intention to unretire and rename pyftpdlib

Sandro wrote: > I was probably overthinking this. In practice it will turn out to be a > new package submission indeed. Moreover, the last remaining active > branch of the retired package (F38) is now EOL. > > I've submitted the review [1] without any Obsoletes. Since we support upgrades from Fed

Re: Intention to unretire and rename pyftpdlib

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 2:48 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Sandro wrote: > > I was probably overthinking this. In practice it will turn out to be a > > new package submission indeed. Moreover, the last remaining active > > branch of the retired package (F38) is now EOL. > > > > I've submitt

Announcement: pagure release 5.14.1 available

Hi everyone, it's been a while and because of increasing requests and important security fixes we release pagure version 5.14.1 today! The release is build based on version 5.13.3 with 59 backports: - 13 features, 34 fixes, 4 security fixes and 8 improvements of the documentation. Checkout th

Re: Announcement: pagure release 5.14.1 available

On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote: > [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine,  to do that I need the package updated, please add some builds . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. --

SPDX Statistics - Morse edition

Hot news:  SPDX released new license list https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.24.0 with 25 new licenses. Lot of them are there because of Fedora maintainers. Thank you. Two weeks ago we had: * 23990spec files in Fedora * 30640license tags in all spec files * 10589 ta

Re: Announcement: pagure release 5.14.1 available

> On 05/24/2024 5:03 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote: > > [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure > > good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine,  to do that I > need the package updated, please add some builds .

Re: small logic issue with system upgrades

Dnia Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:33:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz napisał(a): > Am 24.05.24 um 12:01 schrieb Roberto Ragusa: > > On 5/22/24 16:33, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > > > So, atm, the server has a sshd that says, that openssl is newer as > > > the required openssl version. It does not start it no