Dne 08. 04. 24 v 8:23 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from OSL 2.0 to OSL-2.0
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected package:
dirvish
Change from ERPL to ErlPL-1.1
Affected packages:
erlang-gen_leader
erlang-p1_pgsql
Change from EU
Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation
Network-scripts heavily depend on dhclient and there is no plan to rework
them to use a different dhcp implementation.
ne 14. 4. 2024 v 17:14 odesílatel Adam Williamson <
a
Dne 13. 04. 24 v 1:16 odp. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
The proposal explicitly states that we don't want Perl in all buildroots.
How many seconds we save by NOT pulling Perl? Per each build? In total for
whole release cycle?
How many seconds we loose (lost) by refactoring the code?
Hi folks,
Taskwarrior has recently released version 3.x. While the command line
remains the same, this version includes backwards incompatible changes:
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/taskwarrior/releases/tag/v3.0.0
https://taskwarrior.org/docs/upgrade-3/
- the user task database format
+1 to create task3 but the CLI command is "task". It either needs to rename
both like "task2,task3" or conflict old and new ones and prevent installing
both of them.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:13:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 18:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:00:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > This should have been an announced Change. This is a significant
> > > > change with wide impact.
Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
[+] All set and ready to build.
clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
[-Wunused-command-line-argument]
clang: warning: -Wl,--as-needed: 'linker' input unused
[-Wunused-comm
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:55:34AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
> [-Wunused-command-l
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
> [-Wunused-command-line-argume
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:55:34 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
> [-Wunused-command-line
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 09:41:05 -, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
>
> +1 to create task3 but the CLI command is "task". It either needs to
> rename both like "task2,task3" or conflict old and new ones and
> prevent installing both of them.
They are not designed to be installed in parallel, so task3 will
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 05:44:36PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 4/12/24 16:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > it seems since I last looked at this, NM has grown some level of
> > openvswitch support, but it seems to be limited, and I don't know off-
> > hand if it's sufficient for what openQA needs.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:10:28AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 13. 04. 24 v 1:16 odp. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > The proposal explicitly states that we don't want Perl in all buildroots.
>
> How many seconds we save by NOT pulling Perl? Per each build? In total for
> whole
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:46:39AM +0200, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
> Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation
That page has Category:ChangePageIncomplete.
dhcp-client is present in F40, even though it has Provides:dep
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
They are not designed to be installed in parallel, so task3 will
obsolete task. However, task3 will not provide the task package, so that
task will not be updated to task3 during normal upgrades. Users will
have to expli
Our guidelines suggest that the "main" package should be unversioned,
while if needed, the "compat" packages should include version:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple
So if you want to introduce new package, then please introduce `task2`
and update the
Dne 13. 04. 24 v 21:04 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 01:38:49PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 01:41:59PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Yes. But actually I t
Dne 15. 04. 24 v 11:10 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 13. 04. 24 v 1:16 odp. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
The proposal explicitly states that we don't want Perl in all buildroots.
How many seconds we save by NOT pulling Perl? Per each build? In total
for whole release cycle?
I k
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 12:53:06 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Our guidelines suggest that the "main" package should be unversioned, while
> if needed, the "compat" packages should include version:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple
>
> So if you want to int
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 12:50:48 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>They are not designed to be installed in parallel, so task3 will
>obsolete task. However, task3 will not provide the task package, so that
>task will not be up
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Could you please share some comparison of what is impact on buildroot? How
> many packages added, download size, install size.
$ rpm -qiR add-determinism-0.2.0-1.fc40.x86_64
...
Size: 2801276 (installed s
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 10:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
I think is this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263180
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hrm, but the problem here is that a user that currently has the task
package installed (currently v2) will end up with v3 if I update the
task package to v3---which is something we'd like to avoid here.
Just a side question: is
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 125.22 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 14:18:59 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>Hrm, but the problem here is that a user that currently has the task
>package installed (currently v2) will end up with v3 if I update the
>task package to v3---which i
(Adding Eugene for increased visibility)
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> Hello Lichen,
>
> I commented on the issue. Apologies, I didn’t spot it earlier;
> https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/1695
>
> https://pagure.io/user/esyr Eugene Syromiatnikov, s
* NOTE: Meeting time moved 30 minutes earlier.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2
On 4/15/24 02:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
[+] All set and ready to build.
clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
[-Wunused-command-line-argument]
clang: warning: -Wl,--as
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:49:54AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 4/15/24 02:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
> >
> >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
> >
> >[+] All set and ready to build.
> >clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relr
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 10:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:46:39AM +0200, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
> > Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation
>
> That page has Category:Chan
> > > Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation
> >
> > That page has Category:ChangePageIncomplete.
> > dhcp-client is present in F40, even though it has Provides:deprecated().
> >
> > > Network-scripts heavil
OLD: Fedora-40-20240414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 9:41 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Michel Lind just prompted me to notice that the 'network' service
> appears to have been removed from initscripts in Fedora 40+.
> Should this have been a Change? How worried are we about it going out
> in Fedora 40 without having b
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-04-15/flatpak-sig.2024-04-15-15.03.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-04-15/flatpak-sig.2024-04-15-15.03.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproje
One of the characteristics of Kubernetes is that skipping minor
versions during an upgrade is not supported. This reduces the
potential complexity in correctly setting Obsoletes/Provides in the
package for the replacing version. The unsupported version can also be
marked deprecated. These steps can
> The System-V scripts are also deprecated since systemd v254 so
> eventually they'll be going away too:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2023-August/049349.html
This change should be reverted in Fedora. The "systemd cabal"'s hatred of SysV
is insufficient justification f
Hi Ankur,
On 4/15/24 07:59, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 14:18:59 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hrm, but the problem here is that a user that currently has the task
package installed (currently v2) will end up with v3 if I
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 09:20:32PM -, Japheth J.C. Cleaver wrote:
> > The System-V scripts are also deprecated since systemd v254 so
> > eventually they'll be going away too:
> >
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2023-August/049349.html
>
> This change should be revert
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-04-15/fesco.2024-04-15-19.01.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-04-15/fesco.2024-04-15-19.01.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_
As a tangent on this thread, it would be cool if there were a mechanism
in dnf to tell users when an upgrade needs special
attention/instructions. Another example like this is postgresql updates,
which also require manual intervention.
--
___
devel ma
On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 17:35 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> The pygobject3-devel compat provides was recently removed from
> python3-gobject-devel:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pygobject3/c/0eda657eab55405bdbebc6eb3112fcf7dcb517ba?branch=rawhide
>
> However, a number of packages still
41 matches
Mail list logo
