Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from MPLv2.0 to MPL-2.0
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
czmq
erlang-exometer_core
git-fame
golang-github-armon-consul-api
golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp
golang-github-hashicorp-consul-migrate
golang-github-hashicorp-
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> In any case, I prefer to use Gtk apps for Gnome and I assume this is the
> case for Gnome users. Similarly I won't be surprised if KDE users prefer
> QT apps.
I suppose there might be some people who get so emotionally attached to
a widget library that they don't want to use
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - Installing rust-*-devel packages on your local system (i.e. outside
> of ephemeral build environments) is not supported.
> - The "rust-*-devel" packages are build system implementation details,
> if you want to say it like that.
> - They are not shipped to users and are n
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 4:45 AM Scott Schmit wrote:
>
> This perhaps explains why my efforts to use these packages did nothing
> but waste my time for days. 😡
>
> It sounds like you've wasted others' time as well. That's not very
> Friendly, and playing nitpicky language lawyer games doesn't chang
On 05-04-2024 23:45, Aoife Moloney wrote:
== Summary ==
Update to a new upstream release of pytest that is not completely
compatible with previous releases. Pytest 8 is a major upstream
release removing a lot of deprecated functions and introducing
breaking changes.
I was wondering how this wi
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 12:42 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > - Installing rust-*-devel packages on your local system (i.e. outside
> > of ephemeral build environments) is not supported.
> > - The "rust-*-devel" packages are build system implementation details,
> > if you wan
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:51:59 +, Arnie T via devel wrote:
> The 'basic issue' I see is the "one or two" developers, some that nobody
> knows in person, vis-à-vis "many" developers on a big project.
>
The same sort of a secret agent's infiltration attack on a project would
also be possible wi
OLD: Fedora-40-20240405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 20
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
In 0.12.1, Typer was significantly reorganized.
- `typer-slim` is the library (for `import typer`)
- `typer-slim[standard]` adds optional dependencies (currently `rich`
and `shellingham`, basically equivalent to the old `typer[all]`)
- `typer-cli` is the `typer` command-line tool
- `typer` is n
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:07:39PM +, seanmott...@posteo.net wrote:
> Hi devel!
>
> I'm Sean (FAS: seaninspace). I've been working professionally in Linux
> Sysadmin/Engineering positions for over a decade now, and would like to help
> out more :)
>
> I've spent most of my Fedora time in QA w
# F40 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-04-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for another blocker review meeting. We have 4
proposed blockers and 5 proposed freeze exceptions f
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-04-08 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be d
Hey Ben,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, at 5:05 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
> - osbuild
> dist-git: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocrmypdf
> upstream: https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild
Thank you, I'll move our depends to `typer-slim`. I assume the
dist-git URL is a mispaste?
Regards,
Simon
--
_
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:23 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> please $SUBJ, test if you can:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/pull-request/54#comment-190538
>
> Any feedback is appreciated.
I see that this update was now also submitted to Fedora 40, and will
likely ship as a zero
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from ZPLv2.1 to ZPL-2.1
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
python3-zope-fixers
python-transaction
python-zc-customdoctests
python-zc-lockfile
python-zdaemon
python-zope-component
python-zope-deprecation
python-zope-interfa
15 matches
Mail list logo
