> Latest update seems to have fixed it.
That's interesting. It shouldn't be in Fedora yet. I have a Fedora bug
filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268998
and the upstream issue is here:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3332
The fix was only merged yesterday ups
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240315.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 103
Downgraded packages: 4
Size of added packages: 22.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Apologies, there is a typo in the body of the email. To confirm, the new
Beta target date is scheduled for Tuesday 26th March.
Aoife Moloney
Fedora Operations Architect
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 9:49 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], the Fedora Linux 40 Beta RC -1.4 was
OLD: Fedora-40-20240314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240315.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
some reverse dependencies (including gcc) have been adjusted to use the
package name e
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Joseph Myers enhanced glibc.spec so that we no longer need the separate
> glibc32 source package which its tarball of pre-built glibc binaries.
>
> As part of the DNF5 adjustment to the removal of filelists, I believe
> some reverse
