Hi,
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> I've cloned it down and worked on bringing it more up-to-date. Now that
> I have something passing the test suite, I thought I'd file a PR and
> start a discussion. I forked the project on Pagure.io, but found that
> even with my own pe
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 09:23, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> > I've cloned it down and worked on bringing it more up-to-date. Now that
> > I have something passing the test suite, I thought I'd file a PR and
> > start a discussion. I forked
I created this post based on my own experience:
https://dev.to/prinewgirl/a-recipe-made-to-create-your-first-pr-for-the-fedora-project-21be
Hope it helps.
Em dom., 18 de fev. de 2024 às 05:32, Ondrej Mosnáček
escreveu:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 09:23, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Su
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240217.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:27.83 KiB
OLD: Fedora-40-20240217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 54
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:54.00 KiB
Size
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > In my earlier message I quoted this case:
> >
> > > [1] From
> > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/actions/runs/7919159325/job/21619276641?pr=31338:
>
In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large and they stay forever as rawhide is never
EOLed.
We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I want to ask you - the users of Copr - what
will be convenient for you?
The problem is describ
Am So., 18. Feb. 2024 um 13:54 Uhr schrieb Miroslav Suchý :
>
> In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large
> and they stay forever as rawhide is never
> EOLed.
> We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I
> want to ask you - the u
On 18. 02. 24 13:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large
and they stay forever as rawhide is never EOLed.
We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I want
to ask you - the users of Copr - what will be
Hi all.
Next release of Sundials is coming in Rawhide in some days.
Related dependent packages are:
cantera
octave
bout++
Probably, the following one will be a major release (the 7.0)
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys that
> we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not from
> rawhide. So, at the "F40 branch point we had last week", we would:
> - switch the
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 23:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys
> > that
> > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not
> > fr
12 matches
Mail list logo
